http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ en Sat, 25 Jul 2015 02:22:29 +0000 http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/popa-is-ignorant#post-350560 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:04:32 +0000 DaasYochid 350560@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ <p><em>DY: It is correct?</em></p> <p>I believe so (although yit beat me to it). </p> http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/popa-is-ignorant#post-350547 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:31:09 +0000 yitayningwut 350547@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ <p>Ad locum is correct. Or ad loc. Sometimes for שם you write ibidem, or ibid. The difference is that ad loc. means on that thing, like when you cite a pasuk, and Rashi ad loc. Ibid. is used when you are citing another pasuk from the same place. </p> http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/popa-is-ignorant#post-350545 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:22:00 +0000 bpt 350545@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ <p>Whats "ad locum"? (but I will take a serious look at your d'var torah) </p> http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/popa-is-ignorant#post-350474 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:14:02 +0000 Nechomah 350474@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ <p>et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.</p> <p>That's all I have to say on the matter... etc. </p> http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/popa-is-ignorant#post-350387 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:03:19 +0000 popa_bar_abba 350387@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ <p>DY: It is correct? </p> http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/popa-is-ignorant#post-350386 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:01:57 +0000 DaasYochid 350386@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ <p>BTGuy,</p> <p>I am ad idem.</p> <p>Popa, </p> <p>No, yes.<br /> Better, though, to just write שם. </p> http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/popa-is-ignorant#post-350348 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:18:40 +0000 BTGuy 350348@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ <p>Hi PBA.</p> <p>coffee addict is much to visceral to care. After all, he killed a troll with his bare hands. lol</p> <p>Regarding your question, I avoid all latin terminology since they are the epitome of goyishness and the romaine catholic church. lol </p> http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/popa-is-ignorant#post-350344 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:15:16 +0000 crazybrit 350344@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ <p>what's ignorant? </p> http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/popa-is-ignorant#post-350337 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:09:59 +0000 coffee addict 350337@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ <p>I don't really care enough to know </p> http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/popa-is-ignorant#post-350332 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:04:09 +0000 popa_bar_abba 350332@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/ <p>He doesn't know how to use the citation "ad locum."</p> <p>He wants to cite a radak on a passuk. He thinks that you can cite "Radak ad loc." and that means it is the radak on the passuk he is discussing. </p> <p>Are you all ignorant also? Do you know? </p>