<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title><![CDATA[YWN Coffee Room &#187; Topic: Public Apology to WolfishMusings &#38; others]]></title>
<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/</link>
<description><![CDATA[YWN Coffee Room &raquo; Topic: Public Apology to WolfishMusings &amp; others]]></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 02:22:02 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>DaasYochid on "Public Apology to WolfishMusings &#38; others"</title>
<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/public-apology-to-wolfishmusings-others#post-437927</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>DaasYochid</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">437927@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Since the other thread was closed before I got a chance to comment, I want to point out that Zdad correctly pointed out that he does not generally insult other posters (except one whom he called a troll). Although I frequently disagree with Zdad, and find his opinions to be biased and often based on misinformation, I try to keep my dialogue with him civil. I was very uncomfortable with the personal attacks, so I will take this opportunity to say that I think that it went overboard.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Wolf, an ad hominum argument is invalid (unless some of the force of the argument is appeal to authority) when the point being debated is not the person in question. I this case, the ad hominum argument, I think, was not being brought to prove the point about loshon hora.  It was brought as a personal attack, to demonstrate Zdad's inconsistency. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;As an aside, LH does not apply to someone who is not &#34;bichlal amisecha&#34;, and IIRC, the issue of speaking badly about the deceased is not technically a LH issue. I could be wrong, but I think the problem with speaking negatively about Koch is that it shows a lack of hakaras hatov (appreciation) for what he accomplished on behalf of the Jewish people.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>WolfishMusings on "Public Apology to WolfishMusings &#38; others"</title>
<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/public-apology-to-wolfishmusings-others#post-437915</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>WolfishMusings</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">437915@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;In the interest of fairness and accuracy, it should be pointed out that all I did was simply point out that an argument was ad hominem.  I did not actually stand up for or defend anyone in the thread.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Nonetheless, your thoughtfulness and apologies are appreciated.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The Wolf
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>bris kodesh on "Public Apology to WolfishMusings &#38; others"</title>
<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/public-apology-to-wolfishmusings-others#post-437875</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>bris kodesh</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">437875@http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I just wanted to publicly apologize to WolfishMusings and anyone else I accidentally insulted in another CR thread. You and several others did properly stand up for what was right and defended ZDad or asked others to at least stop bashing him.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I wrote something about &#34;all of you are pathetic&#34; and WolfishMusings was correct - not &#34;all of you.&#34;  While I'm on this point, thanks to the moderators who finally closed down that out of hand discussion.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm going to go back to my Mishna Avot... looks like I still have some work to do  :-)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
