Diamonds Are Overrated!

Home Forums Rants Diamonds Are Overrated!

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 53 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #618251
    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    Their price is overinflated and there are other, better gemstones that are actually rare but still purchasable.

    #1177640
    CTLAWYER
    Participant

    RebYidd23…………..

    Reality check time:

    This is America (or maybe you are in EY). o tell a young lady that she is not worth the price of a diamond at her engagement and instead she’ll receive another gemstone you consider a better buy>>>>

    You will be seen as not caring enough for her, she will feel that the other girls will snicker about her ring…she’ll stand out as different with that colored stone, and her family will lower their opinion of you. Better to give a smaller diamond you can afford than a colored stone.

    As for a better gemstone…that is a very subjective word. Diamonds are traditionally known as the hardest gemstone on the MOHs and Vickers scales.

    You claim the price is overinflated,it is all about supply and demand determining the market price. Chances are you will not be buying the benchmark D Flawless investment grade diamond that currently retails at about $29,000 US. It has risen dramatically in the last few years since the 2007/8 international banking collapse, the rise of Muslim Terror attacks, political instability in many areas and the restrictions on ‘blood’ diamonds. It is far easier to shift a small envelope of diamonds across a border than kilo bars of gold.

    This is also a time of conspicuous consumption in the world. With banks paying next to no interest on money deposits, people are willing to spend large amounts on diamonds. There is also the phenomenon of the newly wealthy Russian and Chinese billionaires who have driven up demand for the finest quality stones.

    We have seen changes in the diamond market over time. I can remember one of my trust clients having to insure a particular diamond for $70,000 in the early 1980s. When it came time to distribute the assets of the trust about 10 years ago the market value was only about $35,000.

    I am not in the diamond or jewelry business nor are any of my relatives. However, I am both a husband and father of three daughters and I know that neither Mrs. CTL or my girls would have wanted a colored stone for an engagement ring.

    Remember, one should buy what one can afford, whether a diamond, house, car or cost of a wedding.

    #1177641
    BarryLS1
    Participant

    CTLAWYER: I think you and RebYidd23 are speaking of two different aspects of it. He is speaking from an investment aspect and you of the sentiment. He didn’t mention an engagement ring.

    Halevai that your last line should only be!

    #1177642
    CTLAWYER
    Participant

    BarryLS1

    I dealt with both investment grade diamonds and engagement rings in my reply.

    Diamonds are not a great investment because the pricing is controlled by a cartel led by DeBeers who has the ability to control quantity and quality of stones available on the market.

    One of my favorite scenes in the movie Casablanca is of a wealthy refugee couple in Rick’s Cafe Americain attempting to sell a diamond to finance their trip to freedom. The buyer offers a very low price, the sellers seemed shocked and they are told that ‘diamonds are a drug on the market, everybody tries to sell diamonds’ in these times.

    #1177643
    Sparkly
    Member

    according to wiki “Diamonds are more expensive because they are harder to come by. But this does not explain why diamond cartels act in the way they do. More than a century after Smith’s death it was hypothesized that value is based on scarcity. Diamonds cost more than water because they are harder to come by..”

    #1177644
    yehudayona
    Participant

    As I’ve mentioned before, my wife and I agreed that a diamond was a waste of money, and, at the time, ethically questionable (this was in the days of Apartheid). She was willing to forego an engagement ring entirely. Some years later she asked for a CZ solitaire, which cost less than $200, IIRC.

    #1177645
    akuperma
    Participant

    Diamonds can be manufactured, unlike gold or silver. Whether they will preserve long term value is dubious. They are also hard to appraise and therefore not as easily sold as precious metal.

    #1177646
    Joseph
    Participant

    CTL, you can give a CZ or moissanite, some of which would require an expert to differentiate from a real diamond. Friends and family wouldn’t know it isn’t a real diamond visually.

    #1177647
    Sparkly
    Member

    yehudayona – even tho i know that i may not wear my diamond ring every day (since i dont wear jewelry every day) ill still try to. its because its used as a sign of marriage. so its nice to wear it to show that i have a husband. so its like im wearing it for him.

    #1177648
    huju
    Participant

    Diamonds are overrated, but so are basherts. That’s why men give diamonds to women. If a man does not overrate his bashert, he should not marry her.

    Diamonds as a investment are a terrible idea, except for knowledgeable diamond merchants, which, contrary to the prevailing anti-Semitic view, most of us are not.

    #1177649

    CTLAWYER

    and diamonds are the only jewelry that can be made non-color? as it seems to be what you have written

    #1177650
    Joseph
    Participant

    Diamond engagement rings are merely a public relations ploy by the de Beers diamond cartel. Prior to little over a hundred years ago there was no necessity for diamond engagement rings until de Beers brainwashed the public with their PR.

    There is certainly no Jewish tradition to give a diamond engagement ring and there is nothing Jewish about giving it.

    #1177651
    🍫Syag Lchochma
    Participant

    diamonds are definitely overrated. I got a sapphire because it represents the luchos and is beautiful blue.

    #1177652
    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    I would never marry someone who likes diamonds. If she isn’t willing to accept a better gem, she is too dumb to be seen with me.

    #1177653
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    I can’t say for sure, but I don’t think I would mind if my chosson didn’t buy me a diamond ring. I think it might actually bother me if he did, because I’d be terrified of losing it. Also, I don’t like rings – I don’t even wear watches, because it bothers me to have things on me.

    I would want my chosson to give me some kind of jewelry though, but it doesn’t have to be terribly expensive.

    #1177654
    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    I don’t understand how anyone can wear anything on their hands.

    #1177655
    Joseph
    Participant

    The seforim hakedoshim say a married woman should always be wearing a wedding ring to remind herself and others that she’s married.

    #1177656
    CTLAWYER
    Participant

    Joseph…….

    No, you can give a CZ or other simulated diamond. I don’t gave fake things, and as an attorney our ethics do not look kindly on public deception.

    Mrs. CTL proudly wears the engagement stone my paternal grandfather gave my grandmother in 1917. Eldest daughter in law’s stone was given by maternal grandfather to grandmother in 1919. Next daughter in law has the stone my father gave my mother in 1941. Our next three children are girls the rings will or did come from the chasson.

    Our 15 grandson will get the stone my maternal grandfather bought for my grandmother on their 50th wedding anniversary. There are other assorted stones from our ancestors in the vault for future needs. All will be real, none will be fake and quote ‘good enough to fool others’ we don’t do things that way.

    This is an individual decision, and as I [posted earlier, only buy what you can afford. B”H my forefathers made sure that there were two things we’d not have to buy in the foreseeable future: Diamonds for engagements and burial plots. My Great Grandfather bought 1000 plots in the family cemetery in 1919 for $1000…that was a good investment.

    #1177657
    CTLAWYER
    Participant

    Moshiach agent…

    Precious gemstones are generally separated into two categories:

    Diamonds and colored stones (Rubies, Sapphires and Emeralds).

    Colored Diamonds have imperfection or chemicals causing the color.

    Other stones are often called gemstones, but are really semi-precious stones and often colored, and occasionally clear.

    All of this applies to natural stones, not man made

    #1177658
    👑RebYidd23
    Participant

    CZs are not for fooling people. If you have to be seen with a diamond, get a diamond. But I would not buy a diamond for myself. If I wanted to buy a shiny crystal, I’d buy a Swarovski crystal or cubic zirconia. If I want a precious gem, I’d buy a colored stone. If I ever did want a diamond, I wouldn’t buy natural. I’d either make my own or buy one someone else made.

    #1177659
    Joseph
    Participant

    CTL, Who said anything about being deceptive? Both he and she can be happy with a CZ. Both know it is a CZ. But she doesn’t owe it to the street or her friends to tell them whether it is a CZ or a diamond. And the public and friends and family need not know it is CZ.

    Why are you so insistent that diamonds are required or better than CZ for an engagement?

    #1177660
    yehudayona
    Participant

    Sparkly, if an engagement ring is a sign of marriage, what’s a wedding ring?

    I forgot to mention that despite the diamond cartel’s slogan “Diamonds are forever,” they’re not. My mother’s diamond got shattered internally when something fell on it. After that, it was basically worthless.

    Akuperma, as you probably know, the difficulty of appraising diamonds (or any stone) is the reason that halacha doesn’t allow them for kiddushin.

    #1177661
    CTLAWYER
    Participant

    Joseph…………

    Please do not put words in my mouth.

    Nowhere do I post that diamonds are required for an engagement. The fact that it is our family tradition is certainly not binding on others.

    As for the deception, it is not between the giver and recipient that concerns me, it is the assumed false representation to the world that presents a problem.

    I could no more see my wife or daughters wear a CZ than fake designer handbags or clothing, it’s not what we do.

    These are all personal feelings, they are not to say that use and wearing of CZ or other faux diamond rings is acceptable to others. I have written buy what you can afford. You should also buy what you feel comfortable owning and wearing.

    #1177662
    Joseph
    Participant

    Wearing CZ is no more a false representation to the world as being a diamond than wearing a diamond is a false representation to the world as being a CZ.

    #1177663
    BarryLS1
    Participant

    CTLAWYER Some people put the diamond in a safe and wear a CZ. Seems like a waste to me, especially as you say, that it is not a great investment.

    #1177664
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    It’s only a false representation if you think it’s a maaleh to spend money on diamonds, and you are trying to prove you have that “maaleh” when you don’t. Some people think it’s a “maaleh” to spend less money.

    #1177665
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “Wearing CZ is no more a false representation to the world as being a diamond than wearing a diamond is a false representation to the world as being a CZ.”

    Joseph, good answer.

    #1177666
    Lightbrite
    Participant

    Are there any teachings that deter from inheriting an engagement or wedding ring from a family member who got divorced and/or had an unhappy marriage?

    I read in chassidus it is not recommended to name someone after a relative that was killed or died young or tragically, because that energy would be transferred to the infant.

    Would you want to start your marriage off with a ring that symbolized someone else’s broken union?

    If not, and the ring was not re-used, maybe a jeweler can alter it or set the stone in a new ring to give it new mazal.

    What do you think?

    #1177667
    Joseph
    Participant

    lightbrite: An engagement ring has no significance in Judaism. So inheriting an engagement ring from a family member who got divorced and/or had an unhappy marriage would be no different than inheriting a car or chandelier from a family member who got divorced and/or had an unhappy marriage.

    (A wedding ring does have religious significance so my above point wouldn’t be applicable to it.)

    Regarding naming someone after someone who died young, I understand people often add an additional name to the person being named after, but it definitely is done to name people after people who passed away young.

    #1177668
    Lightbrite
    Participant

    If a Jewish pawn shop person labeled the history of the engagement rings with “DIVORCED,” “INFIDELITY,” “DECEASED: HAPPILY,” “DECEASED: ESTRANGED,” and “UNKNOWN,” why do I feel like some Jews, despite engagement rings not being a Jewish thing (but some people still give and wear them), would be hesitant to jump on the “DIVORCED” deal?

    —Maybe it’s just me, but buying a used car or chandelier that once belonged to a couple no-longer together is a lot different than a item of jewelry given as a token of a union (even if it is only a secular custom).

    #1177669
    Joseph
    Participant

    Would you be hesitant to purchase Rabbi Arush’s book on shalom bayis from a used book shop if you saw written on the inside page the name of a divorced woman?

    #1177670
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Joseph: “Would you be hesitant to purchase Rabbi Arush’s book on shalom bayis from a used book shop if you saw written on the inside page the name of a divorced woman?”

    Actually I think I would be! I definitely thought it was funny when a school I worked in gave out books on relationships written by someone who is divorced! Then again, I have heard of divorced marriage therapists who were reportedly really good marriage therapists (although I don’t know if they really were or not).

    #1177671
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    lightbrite:”—Maybe it’s just me, but buying a used car or chandelier that once belonged to a couple no-longer together is a lot different than a item of jewelry given as a token of a union (even if it is only a secular custom).”

    I agree with that.

    #1177672
    CTLAWYER
    Participant

    Lightbrite

    Your first question asks about inheriting a engagement or wedding ring from a family memebr who git divorced or had an unhappy marriage.

    The inheritor has little say in inheriting. Ownership passes under the terms of the will or the laws of the state it there is no will.

    Your question is really whether one should reuse an engagement or wedding ring in these circumstances?

    Our family passes down diamonds for use in engagement rings, but never reuses the settings. Each kallah deserves a new setting made for her. We’ve never recycled wedding rings. There is a box in the vault with an accumulation of ancestral wedding rings, their value is strictly sentimental.

    I don’t personally believe that any ‘bad luck’ or karma attaches itself to a stone that is reused. If you go to a jeweler to buy a engagement ring, unless the stone is cut to order or has a tracable serial number engraved you have no idea if it was previously owned by a consumer and reset for sale.

    #1177673
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Are there any teachings that deter from inheriting an engagement or wedding ring from a family member who got divorced and/or had an unhappy marriage?

    My mother (who was divorced) gave me her engagement ring to use when I became engaged. I had the stones reset into a new setting and ring.

    With thanks to HKBH, happily married 25 years and counting.

    (And before anyone asks; yes, Eees know all along the origins of the ring.)

    The Wolf

    #1177674
    Joseph
    Participant

    lilmod, but in this case Rabbi Arush wrote the book – not the woman whose name is scribbled on the inside page.

    #1177675
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    And it clearly didn’t help her. That would make me nervous! But maybe it’s the men’s book, and she wasn’t supposed to have read it and that’s what caused the problem! 🙂

    #1177676
    Joseph
    Participant

    It was the women’s edition. But why are you blaming Rabbi Arush?!

    #1177677
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    I’m not blaming him – this is a fictional story, so I don’t want it to sound like motzi shem ra on him. I’m sure that no one who ever read his books got divorced.

    Let’s say a fictional author wrote a fictional book about marriage and it had the name of someone divorced in the cover – that would make me nervous. I’m not saying it’s necessarily rational, but emotions don’t always have to be rational. The whole idea of giving your Kallah a diamond has to do with emotions, not rationality.

    #1177678
    Joseph
    Participant

    Isn’t it a bit disconcerting to assume that a divorced woman’s books, jewelry and possessions become contaminated, verboten and unfit for others use upon her divorce?

    #1177679
    Joseph
    Participant

    Would you borrow a Mesechtes Kesubos from a divorced man or would even that make you nervous?

    Or is borrowing not as emotionally dangerous as buying the sefer from him?

    #1177680
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “Isn’t it a bit disconcerting to assume that a divorced woman’s books, jewelry and possessions become contaminated, verboten and unfit for others use upon her divorce?”

    I hear. I guess it depends if you’re talking about a situation in which the fact that the person happens to be divorced is something that I will associate with my use of the object. With an engagement ring that would most probably be the case. With the other examples, that may or may not be the case.

    Personally, I don’t think I would want a recycled engagement ring. Not to sound spoiled – I don’t know if I would need one altogether, and I don’t know if I would care if it’s diamond or not- but, if I were already getting one, I think I might find it strange to get a recycled one.

    #1177681
    Joseph
    Participant
    #1177682
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Joseph, I have no idea. Maybe yes or maybe no.

    #1177683
    Joseph
    Participant

    What if the ring was Rebbetzin Kanievsky’s?

    #1177684
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    lol. That is really funny. When I was thinking this over earlier today, I was thinking that the only way I could see wanting a recycled engagement ring is if it had belonged to someone chashuve. Rebbetzin Kanievsky Zatsal was the example I thought of! And I had been thinking of writing that!

    Tachlis, I’m still not sure. I could see either way. L’maaseh, I think I will have to have a chasson before I can have any idea how I would feel about a ring.

    #1177685
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    Personally, I don’t think I would want a recycled engagement ring. Not to sound spoiled – I don’t know if I would need one altogether, and I don’t know if I would care if it’s diamond or not- but, if I were already getting one, I think I might find it strange to get a recycled one.

    That’s fine, but at least now we’ve gotten to the point that it’s your personal preference, not a religious issue.

    The Wolf

    #1177686
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Wolf – huh? Who ever said anything about a religious issue here?

    #1177687
    Joseph
    Participant

    I think what Hatzaddik Reb Wolf is getting at, is that there is no issue of mazal or other spiritual issues associated with wearing a divorced woman’s engagement ring.

    #1177688
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    I never thought or implied there were – I was just talking about emotional issues – the whole concept of an engagement ring is emotional not about mazel or spirituality (except in as much all our actions are connected to spirituality).

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 53 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.