Forum Replies Created

Viewing 39 posts - 1 through 39 (of 39 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Techeiles Movie #1600310

    sbeph
    Participant

    youdontsay,
    Obviously I agree nothing would beat derech emunah, but have you read the intro to daas notah. The whole point of the work was to clarify all the misquotes of Reb Chaim, and his son went to his father many times to clarify his position. I think it would be the one sefer that is pretty reliable of all the books quoting Reb Chaim. But maybe I’m just being Naive.

    in reply to: New Techeiles Movie #1600263

    sbeph
    Participant

    TheFakeMaven,
    I really always find these conversations so disheartening from from both sides. Reb Chaim Kanievsky’s opinion is very clear. It is recorded in numerous letter and seforim that he feels that we should assume the chilazon was nignaz. Daas Noteh was written by Reb Chaim’s son in conversation with Reb Chaim, because there are so many inaccurate quotes in general from Reb Chaim. Unfortunately I don’t know much about you, but to dismiss this as hearsay suggest you are like the vast majority on both sides of the issue; completely and totally biased. The clip shows nothing and is obviously cut up. Why the full clip cannot be shown, add to my frustration.


    sbeph
    Participant

    If the question asked was regarding a phone without a filter, It is a very fair question that I wonder a lot myself. Forget Psak Halacha. I know personally I would stumble a lot (and somewhat have) It is a very disturbing and honest question. Yet the guy next to me who speaks constant lashon harah, davens in twenty minutes and rarely makes it to the beis medrash, has more self control than me. I find it all very confusing.


    sbeph
    Participant

    Why do you assume schools are closed? Because the administrators want a day off?! It is so easy for people that do not have the responsibility of the children’s LIVES on their hands to pass judgement. I’m sorry you find it”ridiculous” that the powers that be prioritize the responsibility for the safety of over a thousand students to worrying about your inconvenience. Disagree with the decision and think it was safe. I could respect that. But don’t be upset because of your inconvenience.

    in reply to: Group Games #1210610

    sbeph
    Participant

    11-13, and I want team vs team

    I don’t care about length

    about 20 boys

    in reply to: Group Games #1210608

    sbeph
    Participant

    Jr. High, unlimited budget, no time-frame

    in reply to: Seforim Trailer In Lakeood #1116271

    sbeph
    Participant

    I looked through some of the Lakewood papers on line, but didn’t see anything advertising such a thing. Any more help?!!

    in reply to: Seforim Trailer In Lakeood #1116270

    sbeph
    Participant

    Health, Thank you for all the help so far.I do not live anywhere near Lakewood, any other ideas?

    in reply to: Seforim Trailer In Lakeood #1116268

    sbeph
    Participant

    I think I do. My memory isn’t clear but I think I took a book over 10 years ago, planning to pay for it and never did. Any information would be amazing!

    in reply to: Seforim Trailer In Lakeood #1116266

    sbeph
    Participant

    Something like that

    in reply to: Seforim Trailer In Lakeood #1116263

    sbeph
    Participant

    DaasYochid, do you have any more information?!

    in reply to: Seforim Trailer In Lakeood #1116261

    sbeph
    Participant

    I dont get what you mean. I’m just trying to locate who was s

    selling the seforim

    in reply to: Why do they teach girls to sound like Harrys? #1144977

    sbeph
    Participant

    Few in europe said “o” they either said oy ei or ow

    in reply to: Parve/Chalav Yisrael Energy Bars #933273

    sbeph
    Participant

    has anyone confirmed clif bars are just dairy equipment

    in reply to: Keurig Tevila #928063

    sbeph
    Participant

    Crisis of the week. I have no idea what you mean . There is one opinion that holds a halacha then everyone should go that way. . There is another option. Don’t buy one.

    in reply to: Keurig Tevila #928056

    sbeph
    Participant

    According to the 0u standard tevilah wouldn’t help because it doesn’t get the water internally anyway

    in reply to: Yeshivish Condolences #924137

    sbeph
    Participant

    Chill. I just heard someone I know lost his father in law and i didnt know when walking up to him whether or not to say condolences, I’m sorry about what happened or something else

    in reply to: Singing by Tzibor #897150

    sbeph
    Participant

    rabbiofberlin the gemara is clear that only applies to something chaviv and doesnt apply to frequent ?????. You also need at least 10 people listening and that cant happen if people sing according to what im arguing.

    WIY i was aware of the mishna berura but i’m just wondering about a real halachik issue

    in reply to: Streaming hypocrisy #891699

    sbeph
    Participant

    Aposhitayid: Torah Anytime while being an absolutely amazing website will at times also offer shiurim specifically in streaming format not available to download.

    in reply to: Streaming hypocrisy #891698

    sbeph
    Participant

    Curiosity, I didn’t say they shouldn’t stream, I said that some shiurim are 2 dollars cheaper or free if streamed. Its frustrating that there are speakers I would listen to if I had the Internet, but since I choose not to, I can’t listen to them. Unfortunately I cant’s afford to buy these shiurim. Some of these speakers are on the battlefront against having internet unless absolutely necessary.

    Avhaben: Even streams that are easily copied I don’t think making the decision not to to have internet should lead me to ???? of

    ???? ???? and ?????.

    in reply to: Streaming hypocrisy #891695

    sbeph
    Participant

    That’s my point The Wolf

    That these websites want to be ??? and yet actively encourage me to have a constant internet access. Its very frustrating.

    in reply to: Techeiles πŸ”΅βŽπŸŒβ˜‘οΈπŸŸ #1057710

    sbeph
    Participant

    I didn’t ever go through the whole forum and maybe someone raised this topic but something bothers me. Honestly I’m tempted to wear a pair of Techeles in private. (Im not interested in discussing why not in public) But it really seems strange to do such a thing though some people mentioned they do that. A much bigger issue of “getting the ????” of Techeiles is the fact that if you don’t have ????? on your ????? and you could, you really are probably being ???? an ???. (Not to get into all that Lomdus). Well if Im ????? the ????? enough to wear it to maybe get a ???? i better be ready then to put it on all my four cornered garments. Rather I feel it would be a lot less hypocritical to just say I’m following a ??? not to wear it and be done with it.

    in reply to: Techeiles πŸ”΅βŽπŸŒβ˜‘οΈπŸŸ #1057709

    sbeph
    Participant

    To me the Rayah is a good proof though I think it was mentioned earlier. Reb Shlomo Miller in the second Teshuva on the topic though mentions a similar proof regarding bentching if one only know the first ????. He then says that it doesn’t prove anything though I don’t really understand the reason he writes.

    in reply to: wording to decline a hand shake? #893975

    sbeph
    Participant

    Rabbi Mordechai Finkelman says to say “In our religion we only touch our own spouses (wife/husband)”

    in reply to: Techeiles πŸ”΅βŽπŸŒβ˜‘οΈπŸŸ #1057632

    sbeph
    Participant

    I’m going to stop now my end as I relooked at the ????? of Rabbi Miller and also just saw the second one he wrote for the first time. He addresses these issues and also admits there are many ?????? not like Reb Chaim, he just says not too dismiss it to lightly. The real place to look at this topic in length is the ????? quoted there of the ??? ???? ?????.<http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=37145&st=&pgnum=160&hilite=&gt;

    I don’t understand the point made about ??? ????. You might not gain from taking a ??? ?????. But you are still obligated to take a ???? ????? so you are still im a ??? of ????

    in reply to: Techeiles πŸ”΅βŽπŸŒβ˜‘οΈπŸŸ #1057628

    sbeph
    Participant

    Im going to look over some of the ?????? again, but Im wondering if you believe the underlying reason for all these ????? is ??? ??????? ??????. If on the second day of ??? ???? would one not need to blow ???? according to one opinion. Or second day of ???? not need to take the ?????. I’m not sure yet all the sources say You are ABSOLUTELY ???? to take the ????? in a case of ??? because of ??? ??????? ?????? but as the Mishna Berura says by Shofar It cant hurt because you might be ???? (and i Beg of you not to tell me the same arguement applies to ????? I know, this is not my point)

    in reply to: Techeiles πŸ”΅βŽπŸŒβ˜‘οΈπŸŸ #1057624

    sbeph
    Participant

    I don’t understand your proof regarding the Gemara Rosh Hoshanah. you are obligated in the mitzavah and the possibility of fulfilling it trumps the certain Deraban. I pretty sure the fact there is a ????? there is irrelevant to your proof. You understand that according to Reb Chaim EVEN WITHOUT the ????? you would not have to go to the place since there is no ??? ??????? ?????? there. This as I understand it has nothing to with Reb Chaim. If i have ??? if there is a Esrog in a certain place I need to go find out since I might fulfill my mitzvah 100 percent. Please tell me how you are definitely ending up in a never ending circle like I mentioned earlier.

    I also can’t understand why I have now twice agreed this probably is not normative halacha and you keep telling me that. I am trying to discuss the Reb Chaim. That’s all. Relax and please try to explain your proof from the Gemara so i can appreciate what you are saying.

    in reply to: Techeiles πŸ”΅βŽπŸŒβ˜‘οΈπŸŸ #1057618

    sbeph
    Participant

    The case of tefilin is where the one dropped the ?????? in water and is not sure its ??? the ???? ????? says to still wear it. Please stop quoting cases where you will no longer remain with a ??? (or better said anything to do)

    in reply to: Techeiles πŸ”΅βŽπŸŒβ˜‘οΈπŸŸ #1057615

    sbeph
    Participant

    I didn’t mean to get so personal. Sorry. I’ve just seen the Ran Thrown around so many times it was frustrating. Most Reb Chaims are a Mesorah and this one is no different. Any of the Brisker Mishpacha knows it. I can’t help if it has gotten misquoted.

    Reb Chaim, as i understand it, is saying that an action that will leave you in the exact place you started is useless and can’t require you to do anything. For example, if its Succos and I have only a fruit that is a ??? ?????, taking it will be of little help. Before I take the fruit I am ???? to take an ????? and after I take the fruit, since there is a ??? ??????? ?????? I’m still obligated to take the fruit. What did I accomplish in taking the fruit and you enter in to a circular world. In the case of Rosh Hashanah In the end of the day you will know if you accomplished the Mitzvah and end the circle. It makes a lot of sence .

    With that said I do agree by Tefillin this is certainly not the case.

    Also you are confusing two points. There are those that ague one MUST wear ????? because of ??? ???????? ??????. Rabbi Miller is just saying according to Reb Chaim you don’t have to. However all this does is explain why one is Not ???? to wear ?????, there still might be what to gain. If its my only esrog, while not ???? to take it, I still might be ???? the ???? ( I don’t honestly believe that any one that was stranded on a desert Island with only a ??? ????? wouldn’t take it.) And anyways many think there is not much of a ??? as you point out.

    in reply to: Techeiles πŸ”΅βŽπŸŒβ˜‘οΈπŸŸ #1057606

    sbeph
    Participant

    I’m sorry you cant find the Reb Chaim. I think Reb Moshe Sternbauch brings it down. It makes total sense you just have a wrong version of it. This is not the Chacham Echad from the Radziner.

    Truth be told however the mishna berua by ?????? does disagree and i dont think the Reb Chaim is normative ????. Also the Briskers are the ones that take 20 ???????.

    in reply to: Techeiles πŸ”΅βŽπŸŒβ˜‘οΈπŸŸ #1057604

    sbeph
    Participant

    “The gemara in Rosh Hashana is poshut telling us in the maskana of the gemara that safek deoraysa will be mechayev you to go somewhere which is a safek if you will be mekayem a mitzvah, even at teh cost of a vadai drabanan. And see the way the Mishna berura explains it in siman 595. About the ran, there is a lot to sasy about Rabbi Miller’s tayneh, but being that all the other mareh mekomos are clearly applicable I will not elaborate”.

    I saw a discussion from 3 months ago about the Reb Chaim that a safek mitzvah is not ????.

    This has always been my prime example what happens when not lomdanim get involved with PSAK. They end up embarrassing themselves. Ive seen this Ran etc quoted so often and it is a total error. Nothing to discuss. The briskers have a Mesora that if the fulfilling of a Mitzah one will still remain in a Matzav of Chiyuv it is useless. Therfor if one performs a Mitzvah in a way that he will still have to do it again because of ??? ??????? ?????? then he accomplished nothing. So if you have a ???? that was ??? ???, there is no point in taking it because ??? ??????? will tell you do it again. However if you are ????? if you are ???? in a ???? or could possibly fulfill it for sure (the case of ??? ????) then of course you have to do it (The radziner quotes someone that say you would be ???? but this in NOT the Reb Chaim) The Ran is talking about Bein Hashmeashos which is a ??? whether you are ???? and by taking it you will fulfill that requirement nothing else to do, no different from a tumtum who is ???? I hate to say it, but anyone quoting the Ran either totally missed Reb Chaim or is completely embarrassing himself.

    in reply to: Learning during Chazoras Hashatz #1089025

    sbeph
    Participant

    Please just answer my questions. You are so bothered by LEARNING during chazoos hashatz. Is that because the mishna berura says not to do it because others might learn from it. Apparently you refuse to say “not listening” is what is bothering you. It is REALLY STRANGE for someone to have that as a “pet peeve” I will show you many Mishna Beruras that are not followed. Just be honest.

    Also the magen avraham is not refering to answering to amein and not having ????? That is a very serious ?????

    in reply to: Learning during Chazoras Hashatz #1089017

    sbeph
    Participant

    I don’t want anyone thinking I’m for learning during Chazoret Hashatz. A more appropriate title for this thread is what to do about people that don’t pay attention during chazoras hashatz (no matter what type of activity they are engaged in spacing out, learning or texting etc.) One little piece of advice I can give is that while many find davening from the sefer that brakes up shmonei esrei line by line to cumbersome to use it to follow chozaras hashatz

    in reply to: Learning during Chazoras Hashatz #1089014

    sbeph
    Participant

    The vast majority of people anwering amein have no ????? it s better not to say amein at all that not have ?????

    in reply to: Learning during Chazoras Hashatz #1089012

    sbeph
    Participant

    This is so ridiculous SOOO many people are against learning and yet I go to any and every shul and 99.999999999999999999999999% of the people are spaced out. Give me a break, like you really care that people are not listening.

    How many people pick up sefer thinking this is a mitzvah. People are interested in what seforim. SHOW ME A SINGLE PERSON THAT PICKS UP A SEFER DURING CHOZARAS HASHATZ That thinks he is doing a mitzavah

    Oh by the way Reb chaim kanievski paskens that technically if one misses the beginning of chozres Hashatz there is no inyan to listen to the rest. AND saying Amein w/o kevanah is a real averia is for sure worse then learning and not saying amein at all.

    in reply to: Learning during Chazoras Hashatz #1089002

    sbeph
    Participant

    Almost every person I see spaces out instead of learn. Show me a single source that says it is better then space out then learn (it says not to learn because others might learn from you im talking about intrinsically i have a feeling most people in this post are not concerned bout this halacha) So why not start about a post about all the people that space out

    in reply to: Middos alert for Dr. Middos! #1073243

    sbeph
    Participant

    i agree zeeskite however being dan lchaf zechus tape characters is a HUGE machlokes. Also Dr middos really does mellow out in the last tape (he sounds like he gained 20 years experience in just a week) really very inspiring how much mussar could help

    in reply to: Middos alert for Dr. Middos! #1073238

    sbeph
    Participant

    zeeskite i think your kind of thinking is extremely skewed. If it wasn’t for shnooky the midos machine would still be unplugged, yet the only way shnooky prevailed was with interrupting dr midos when he was ignoring him, and than after getting snapped at informing dr middos with a shaky voice that the machine was unplugged. (Frankly i have a different theory why dr middos keep the settings for children only)

    in reply to: High level Shiurim #874507

    sbeph
    Participant

    anytopic really but chumash hashkafa is prefered. I Meant the speker should say over a lot of sources. I find the vast majority of speakers have a few sources and repeat themselves many times. Rav Schecter is close to what I Like, though i find im ussually looking for some more varied sources and more depth

Viewing 39 posts - 1 through 39 (of 39 total)


Trending