FBI To Join Inquiry Into Corzine Firm

November 1st, 2011

Federal prosecutors and the FBI are set to join the inquiry into what happened to hundreds of millions of dollars invested with a securities firm headed by former New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine, officials familiar with the case told NBC New York.

The Justice Department involvement comes as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodities Future Trading Commission have said their own inquiry is underway into the collapse of the brokerage firm, MF Global Holdings Ltd.

The head of the Chicago Mercantile exchange said Tuesday that the firm broke rules requiring it to keep clients’ money and company funds in separate accounts.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara declined to comment Tuesday as did DOJ spokesmen in New York and Washington. An FBI spokesman also declined to comment.

An SEC spokesman said there are “possible deficiencies in customer futures segregated accounts held at the firm.”  The Securities Investor Protection Corporation has announced liquidation of MF Global is now underway.

The former governor and U.S. senator who served on the Senate Banking Committee has not been charged with any wrongdoing. But there are questions as to whether the firm improperly used hundreds of millions of client money to cover bets made by the firm.

Corzine had been seeking to sell his firm in recent days but potential bidders backed out.  According to the New York Times, one firm, Interactive Brokers, discovered client investments appeared to be missing, and abandoned its deal.

READ MORE: NBC NEW YORK

Monsey: Grand Jury Indicts 3 In Attempted Robbery; Hate Crimes

February 11th, 2012

A Rockland County grand jury on Friday indicted three of four people accused of hate crimes in connection with an attempted robbery on a man in Monsey.

Ramapo police said Tuesday, in announcing the arrests of the accused, that the 19-year old victim had been targeted because he was Jewish.

Only two of the three accused still face hate crime charges while a fourth person who was not indicted by the grand jury could face charges in Ramapo town Justice Court.

Charges were listed Friday in the certifications of indictments submitted to the County Court by the Rockland District Attorney’s Office.

The victim, from Brooklyn, suffered pain, but his head was not cut because the knife was sheathed. He refused medical attention, police said.

He was walking near the Monsey firehouse on Grove Street just before midnight Monday when the attack is said to have occurred.

Stanley Joseph, 18, of 5 Oakdale Manor, in Suffern, Jennifer St. Amand, 20, of 138 Route 59, in Airmont and Qwesi Williams, 19, of 781 Ocean Ave., in Brooklyn, were all indicted.

READ MORE: LOHUD

Romney Doubles Down, Wins CPAC, Maine Caucuses

February 11th, 2012

Mitt Romney landed a much-needed one-two punch Saturday, reasserting himself in the GOP presidential race with a win in the straw poll at the Conservative Political Action Conference and later emerging triumphant in the Maine caucuses.

At CPAC, the former Massachusetts governor nabbed 38 percent of activists’ support to edge out Rick Santorum, who finished second with 31 percent.

In Maine, he won by just three points, 39 percent to Paul’s 36 percent. Santorum trailed in third with 18 percent, and Newt Gingrich received 6 percent of the vote.

Following a Friday speech aimed directly at conservative core principles, Romney said Saturday he was “honored” by the CPAC result.

“I’m heartened that so many friends here agree with me about the need for conservative change,” he tweeted.

In a statement, he said the voters of Maine had “sent a clear message” that they wanted an “outsider” and “conservative” in the White House.

Of 3,804 votes cast in Washington, D.C., at the annual conference of influential conservatives, Newt Gingrich received 15 percent and Ron Paul — the only major GOP presidential contender not to personally appear at CPAC or actively compete in the poll — got 12 percent.

Romney also led a national poll of conservatives released simultaneously with the straw poll results. But the results were narrower, with him beating Santorum, 27 percent to 25 percent, and Newt Gingrich placing third with 20 percent to Paul’s 8 percent. The survey was conducted by Fabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates and has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.

The Romney campaign, which has struggled to win over conservatives, worked quietly to assure the poll’s outcome. Earlier Saturday, volunteers in Romney T-shirts prodded supporters to vote before time was up.

Coming off a week in which he re-emerged as a real contender in the race, Santorum’s camp wasn’t as organized, so whatever support he had at the gathering was likely more spontaneous.

The results reflect the state of the volatile primary race at the moment, with Romney and Santorum battling it out for the top spot. But the race has changed course more than once since it began.

His third-place finish is more evidence that Gingrich, the former House speaker, has faded. Gingrich’s speech to the group Friday afternoon underwhelmed, and his weak finish will likely further propel conservative leaders and activists to coalesce behind Santorum, who won a trio of contests on Tuesday in Missouri, Minnesota and Colorado.

More than 10,000 activists attended the three-day confab, perhaps the most important conservative gathering on the campaign calendar.

Organizers moved from paper ballots to computerized voting for this year’s straw poll, which allowed them to keep voting open through Saturday.

Paul won last year’s straw poll with 30 percent, while Romney finished second with 23 percent. Gingrich received 5 percent to Santorum’s 2 percent.

Paul did not speak at this year’s CPAC, but instead campaigned in Maine, where he had a real shot at winning the caucuses, but ultimately fell short. His organization did not work aggressively to turn out his supporters at CPAC, and they publicly said they did not care about the outcome.

The straw poll also asked attendees to pick their first choice for vice president. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio topped the list with 34 percent of activists’ support, compared to 15 percent apiece for New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

(Source: Politico)

Ahmadinejad: Iran Will Soon Unveil ‘Big New’ Nuclear Achievements

February 11th, 2012

Iran will soon unveil “big new” nuclear achievements, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Saturday while reiterating Tehran’s readiness to revive talks with the West over the country’s controversial nuclear program.

Ahmadinejad spoke at a rally in Tehran as tens of thousands of Iranians marked the 33rd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution that toppled the pro-Western monarchy and brought Islamic clerics to power.

Ahmadinejad did not elaborate on the upcoming announcement but insisted Iran would never give up its uranium enrichment, a process that makes material for reactors as well as weapons.

The West suspects Iran’s nuclear program is aimed at producing atomic weapons, a charge Tehran denies, insisting it’s geared for peaceful purposes only, such as energy production.

Four rounds of U.N. sanctions and recent tough financial penalties by the U.S. and the European Union have failed to get Iran to halt aspects of its atomic work that could provide a possible pathway to weapons production.

“Within the next few days the world will witness the inauguration of several big new achievements in the nuclear field,” Ahmadinejad told the crowd in Tehran’s famous Azadi, or Freedom, square.

READ MORE: WASH-POST

Slight Improvement in Rav Elyashiv’s Condition

February 11th, 2012

Kol Chai Radio reported on motzei Shabbos that there was a slight improvement in the condition of Maran Posek HaDor HaGaon HaRav Yosef Sholom Elyashiv Shlita. As such, doctors are hoping to perform an unspecified medical procedure on the rav on Sunday.

Kikar Shabbat reports that HaGaon HaRav Chaim Kanievsky Shlita has asked the tzibur to have kavana while saying the bracha of Asher Yatzar, as a Zechus for Yosef Sholom ben Chaya Musha LiRefuah Shleima.

(YWN – Israel Desk, Jerusalem)

Bondi, Australia: Rail Customer Service: If You’re Jewish Catch A Taxi

February 11th, 2012

Cheryl Bogan couldn’t believe her ears. It wasn’t until the CityRail employee repeated himself in a louder voice that she and her husband, Jeffrey, were sure they were under racist attack by a public servant. The customer service manager at Central Station, no less.

‘‘They’re all Jews living in the eastern suburbs; they’re all wealthy; they can afford to get a taxi,’’ Roman Arnusch uttered repeatedly, according to the couple.

The Bogans, who are Jewish and live at Bondi, had stepped off a train late at night and asked another CityRail staff member whether trains were still running to Bondi Junction. A ‘‘polite and helpful’’ Arly Ribet, a subordinate to Mr Arnusch, told them that services had finished and they would need to get a taxi.

It was then that Mr Arnusch, 62, piped up from behind with his observations about Jews, repeating himself up to five times as other passengers got off the train.

‘‘I was utterly shocked,’’ Mrs Bogan told The Sun-Herald. ‘‘You don’t expect to hear that from a staff member of the railways. We sort of looked at each other and said, ‘This isn’t right, we need to say something.’‘’

After an investigation and in setting aside the RailCorp decision, Commissioner Inaam Tabbaa said: ‘‘Whether the remark that Mr Arnusch made was in the terms as described by CSA Ribet, or the Bogans or the appellant himself, it was racist, offensive, uncalled for and completely inappropriate, particularly for someone in a customer service position with RailCorp.’‘

Despite that, the commissioner noted Mr Arnusch’s ‘‘distinguished’’ career of almost 30 years and glowing references provided. ‘‘Dismissal is extreme in the present circumstances as it would serve to end his working life given his age and field of experience,’’ she said.

Mrs Bogan said she was satisfied as long as he had ‘‘learnt his lesson’‘.

Asked whether he regretted his statements, he said: ‘‘I’m just happy it has all been sorted out now.’’

READ MORE: SMH

Bad News For AT&T Customers

February 11th, 2012

Got your eye on an iPhone 4S? What about a Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket? Multiple reports that AT&T is set to double its upgrade fee on Sunday, February 12, from $18 to $36 may motivate you to get to the store a bit quicker to get that snazzy new smartphone.

The wireless giant confirmed the news to The Huffington Post in an email on Saturday:

Wireless devices today are more sophisticated than ever before. And because of that, the costs associated with upgrading to a new device have increased and is reflected in our new upgrade fee. This fee isn’t unique to AT&T and this is the first time we’re changing it in nearly 10 years.

Gizmodo reports, however, that Verizon doesn’t have an upgrade fee, while Sprint raised its upgrade fee in September to $36.

(Android Central got its hands on screenshot of a document with AT&T’s talking points about the fee increase, so click over to see the image.)

Wireless and Mobile News notes the increase comes just days ahead of the February 19th release of the Samsung Galaxy Note phone/tablet hybrid.

AT&T lost $6.68 billion in the fourth quarter of 2011, much of which was attributed to the failed acquisition of T-Mobile USA, according to The Associated Press. Days later, Reuters reported a management shakeup at the Dallas-based company.

(Source: Huff Post)

CIA Fears Drone Downed In Iran Failed To Dump Sensitive Data

February 10th, 2012

A CIA investigation failed to discover what caused a US drone to come down in Iran late last year and raised fears it failed to dump sensitive data, FOX News Channel reported Friday.

A former intelligence official confirmed to FOX News that the CIA’s comprehensive, 10-week review was unable to replicate the malfunction that brought down the RQ-170 Sentinel drone in Iran.

Contact was lost with the drone and its operators Nov. 29.

Based on the review, investigators believe one of the drone’s three major data streams began sending back bad information to its US-based operator. A leading question is whether the bad data caused the drone’s operator to inadvertently land the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).

It raises the question of whether the faulty data stream meant the drone did not dump the intelligence that it collected. When the UAV malfunctions, it is programmed to dump data so it does not fall into the wrong hands.

“We have looked at this eight ways to Sunday. I can tell you it was a US technical problem. The information [data] was not lining up, and it was not the result of Iranian interference or jamming,” a congressional official familiar with the CIA review said.

Investigators were focusing on how to prevent a repeat of the incident in the future, but without the hardware or the drone — Iran refused to return it — those efforts have been frustrated.

(Source: Newscore)

Rabbi Krakowski: Parshas Yisro

February 10th, 2012

The central subject of this week’s Sedra is Ma’amad Har Sinai. The Torah places strong emphasis on the strict need for the People to stay away from the Mountain. The Torah tells us that anyone who comes close and touches “the Mountain” – the site of Ma’amad Har Sinai – is liable to be stoned. Should that person happen to be too far from the rest of Am-Yisroel to be stoned, the rest of Am-Yisroel is even duty-bound to shoot arrows so as to kill him. While stoning is a form of death prescribed elsewhere by the Torah for various crimes and transgressions after due process, it is here applicable even without a tribunal. What was it with Kabbolos HaTorah that called for such strict measures? Furthermore, aside from a tribunal not being needed, there is no provision in the Torah for execution by shooting. Why is it that here the Torah required someone who merely touched Har Sinai to be shot dead?

Maamad Har Sinai was an auspicious site; it was a place filled with Kedusha. The power of the moment at Kabbolos HaTorah was amazing. It was so because the Torah is holy and awesome. Most probably the fear from the awesomeness of Matan Torah was on its own sufficient to have kept everyone away from Har Sinai. So why was it necessary for Hashem to forbid it and to forbid it so strictly?

The mere fact that it was superfluous for Hashem to have forbidden us from coming close it implies that the prohibition wasn’t for its own sake rather for the sake of something else. It would appear that Hashem wanted to emphasize that one has to realize that a distance must be placed between oneself and the source of Kedusha.

We are mere mortals and as such are quite limited. Hashem and His Torah are unlimited. Hashem gave us the Torah because He wishes for us to have to toil to fulfill it and to comply with it. In order for us to implement Torah into our life we must first recognize the gap between ourselves and Hashem the Omnipotent.

We must understand what it means to be human, for only then can we implement Torah in our lives. If we don’t know and understand the world in which we exist, we cannot expect to understand Hashem and his Torah. We must always realize that we perceive Torah from a human perspective. At the same time we must remember that this is precisely the vantage point from which Hashem expects us to see the Torah.

A very warm Good Shabbos, Rabbi Y. Dov Krakowski

Jewish Groups Demand New Probe Into Marine Photo

February 10th, 2012

A leading Jewish organization and others outraged by a photo showing Marine snipers in Afghanistan posing with a logo resembling a notorious Nazi symbol are demanding President Barack Obama order an investigation and hold the troops accountable.

The Marine Corps has said it does not plan any discipline because there was no malicious intent. The Marines mistakenly believed the “SS” in the shape of white lightning bolts on the blue flag were a nod to sniper scouts — not members of Adolf Hitler’s special unit that murdered millions of Jews, gypsies and others, said Maj. Gabrielle Chapin, a spokeswoman at Camp Pendleton, Calif.

The Marines are no longer with Charlie Company, 1st Reconnaissance Battalion, out of the base north of San Diego, and Chapin said she did not know if they had left the Corps.

Military officials learned of the photograph in November and investigated immediately. It later surfaced on a blog of a military weapons company.

In the September 2010 photo taken in the Sangin district of Helmand province, Marines with guns pose in front of an American flag above a dark blue flag with the “SS” letters.

Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder of Los Angeles’ Simon Wiesenthal Center, said he does not believe it was an innocent mistake and insisted the American public has a right to know what happened.

His organization — one of the largest international Jewish human rights groups with more than 400,000 members — is demanding Obama and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta launch another investigation and discipline those involved.

“That 70 years after the United States Armed Forces helped liberate Europe from Nazi Germany, to learn that a unit of the United States Marine Corps serving in Afghanistan adopted the SS insignia alongside the Stars and Stripes, desecrates the memory of some 200,000 Americans who gave up their lives to defend freedom against that infamous symbol,” he said in a statement.

The Corps has used the incident as a training tool to talk to troops about what symbols are acceptable, Chapin said.
“I don’t believe that the Marines involved would have ever used any type of symbol associated with the Nazi Germany military criminal organization that committed mass atrocities in WWII,” Chapin said. “It’s not within who we are as Marines.”

Hier said it clearly shows more training about the Holocaust and the SS unit is needed.

It was the second time this year that photos have surfaced showing Marines acting improperly and forcing the Corps to deal with the fallout. Last month, the Pentagon scrambled to contain the damage after an Internet video purportedly showed Marines urinating on Taliban corpses — an act that appears to violate international laws of warfare and further strains U.S.-Afghan relations. Panetta called Afghan President Hamid Karzai to offer assurances of an investigation, and the top Marine general promised an internal probe as well as a criminal one.

Those Marines, like the ones in front of the flag, fought in former Taliban strongholds in Helmand province. They are based at Camp Lejeune, N.C.

Mikey Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, headquartered in Albuquerque, N.M., said the scandals hurt U.S. military missions. His organization sent a letter to the head of the Marine Corps, Gen. James Amos, and Panetta on Thursday calling on them to “condemn this stomach-turning display without equivocation or delay and severely punish all of those responsible.”

His organization released another photo showing a Marine and his rifle with the “SS” logo. According to the Marine Corps Times, embedded electronic information in the image shows that it was released by the Corps in 2004 and taken at the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center at Twentynine Palms, Calif. Two Marines in it were with a scout sniper platoon.

The newspaper said that suggests the practice is more widespread and that the logo’s use is meant to signify “scout sniper,” a position exclusive to the Corps. The Army has scouts and snipers, but considers the positions to be separate.

Weinstein said more needs to be done to stop the use of the logo.

“This shameful display of SS ‘lightning bolts’ by U.S. service personnel enrages our regional allies, emboldens the extremist Islamist forces with whom we are contending, and eviscerates good order, morale, and discipline within the U.S. Marine Corps,” said Weinstein, who founded the advocacy group that calls attention to violations by the military in regards to respecting people of all beliefs.

Thanks to the Internet, the public throughout the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have witnessed inappropriate behavior by troops photographed or recorded on video in acts ranging from criminal to simply stupid.

(Source: ABC News)

IDF Soldier Linked To ‘Price Tag’ Attack In West Bank Palestinian Village

February 10th, 2012

An Israel Defense Forces soldier is suspected of perpetrating a so-called “price tag” attack in a Palestinian West Bank village, following recently intercepted security camera footage.

The Golani soldier and resident of the Itamar settlement was arrested along with two young women after footage indicated the three vandalizing the Palestinian village of Luban al-Sharqiya near Shechem.

According to a preliminary investigation, the three are suspected of entering the West Bank village on 1:30 A.M. Tuesday, where they sprayed the caption “Muhammad is a pig” on one of the walls and sabotaged a construction materials shop.

Security camera footage shows one of the young women stabbing sacks of building material piled up near the shop.

Later, a confrontation ensued between the three and local residents who woke up following the ruckus, during which the IDF soldier threatened the Palestinians with his rifle, causing them to flee the scene.

Suspects linked to the case were arrested on Thursday, with their arrest remanded until Monday.

The solder admitted to the act and is scheduled to be detained until Monday.

READ MORE: HAARETZ

Russian Officer Convicted Of Spying For CIA

February 10th, 2012

A military court on Friday convicted a Russian officer of passing missile secrets to the CIA and sentenced him to 13 years in prison, officials said. Lt.-Col. Vladimir Nesterets also was stripped of his military rank after he pleaded guilty to passing classified information about Russian missile tests to the CIA for money, said the Federal Security Service, the main agency that replaced the KGB.

The agency said Nesterets committed treason as he worked as a senior engineer at the Plesetsk launch pad in northwestern Russia, a facility the military uses to launch satellites and test missiles. The security service’s terse statement did not say when Nesterets had been arrested or give any further details about his case.

(Source: Ynet)

Vatican Dismisses Report Of Plot To Kill Pope As Delirious

February 10th, 2012

The Vatican on Friday dismissed as “delirious” an Italian newspaper report that said Pope Benedict would be assassinated within 12 months.

“This is obviously delirious raving that cannot be taken seriously in any way,” said Father Federico Lombardi, the Vatican’s chief spokesman.

The newspaper Il Fatto Quotidiano ran a front-page story, picked up by Italian state television, that said a cardinal wrote a secret note to a superior in the Vatican that he had heard about a plot to kill the pope within a year.

The paper also said the same cardinal had predicted that the next pope would be an Italian. Benedict, who was elected in 2005, is German.

(Source: Reuters)

Israel Successfully Tests Arrow Missile Defense System

February 10th, 2012

The Defense Ministry said Friday that a recent test of key components in the Hetz (“Arrow”) missile system was successful.

The Arrow is an anti-ballistic surface-to-air missile system.

An IAF F-15 fighter jet taking part in the test fired a target projectile, nicknamed “blue sparrow,” and the radar successfully detected it and sent the relevant data to the Arrow’s command and control center.

The new system, the Defense Ministry’s statement said, incorporates several links to US-made ballistic missile defense systems.

Defense sources said that the test was carried out according to the military’s perennial work-plan.

“This test is a milestone the Arrow-4 system’s upgrade, ahead of its delivery to the IAF,” a security source added.

(Source: Ynet)

Should Bumbo Baby Seat Be Recalled Again?

February 10th, 2012

A coalition of consumer groups this week called on the Consumer Product Safety Commission to again recall a hugely popular baby seat and to have the manufacturer redesign it to make it safer.

The Bumbo Baby Seat is linked to 33 skull fractures, including two while used on the floor, as recommended. Four million of the seats have been sold in the U.S.

Asked why it doesn’t redesign the seat with a strap to keep kids from falling out, Bumbo International said Thursday that a safety strap would give parents a “false sense of security.”

The seat was recalled in 2007 to add a label warning that it should never be used on a raised surface; versions made since then include the warning label. In November, CPSC said it knew of at least 45 incidents since the recall involving babies who fell out of the seat while it was on a raised surface. Seventeen of those involved infants, ages 3 months to 10 months, who suffered skull fractures.

The seat “is a safe product for infants when it is used as intended,” the South Africa-based Bumbo said in a statement.

When deaths or injuries occur, manufacturers often say consumers aren’t using the products correctly. But federal safety law requires them to design products with both “foreseeable use” and misuse in mind.

“The majority of CPSC’s recalls involve no incidents or injuries,” says CPSC spokesman Scott Wolfson. “In most cases, companies follow their federal reporting obligation at the soonest possible point whether there is a potential or identified safety hazard.”

Bumbo’s seat defies conventional description. It’s not a car seat, infant carrier or baby bath seat and isn’t covered by federal or industry standards.

In a complaint on CPSC’s SaferProducts.gov database, the mother of a baby who fell out of his seat when used on the floor said she was right next to him at the time. She wanted parents who leave children alone in the seats to “be aware of the dangers.” Bumbo says it knows of nine children who have needed medical treatment for injuries while the seat was used on the floor. When used properly, the risk of falls from the seat “is no greater than the risk of falls when a child is crawling, sitting, or learning to walk,” Bumbo said in the statement.

READ MORE: USA TODAY

Silver Spring, MD: High School Changes Headwear Policy After Kippah Incident

February 10th, 2012

Northwood High School has changed its policy regarding religious headwear.

A parent’s word is now sufficient to justify a student’s religious reason to wear a head covering, according to a letter sent home to Northwood parents Feb. 9.

The policy change came after a meeting earlier this week between the Northwood principal and the father of a Jewish student who has been at the center of recent debate over religious headwear at Montgomery County Public Schools.

When 17-year-old Caleb Tanenbaum started wearing a large, black, knitted hat to Northwood the last week of January, school administration asked him to remove it. After Caleb’s parents, Steven and Lana Tanenbaum, confirmed that it was a traditional Jewish head covering, the administration then requested a letter of justification from a rabbi.

Steven Tanenbaum saw this as unfair treatment and complained to the MCPS superintendent, as well as to several Jewish and civil rights groups. He asked for a letter of apology to the family and a reform in the policy.

After meeting earlier this week with the principal, Tanenbaum wrote an email to the administration and MCPS officials describing his plans for “a proposal to the Montgomery County Public School Board to form one unified county policy that deals with head coverings, and specific due process to remedy any conflicts. My goal is to ensure that no discrimination, intentionally or unintentionally ever occurs again with regards to this matter.”

In the same email, he also wrote the following: “I feel that Dr. Johnson is a caring man, and has a difficult job to do, and made an honest mistake, which he acknowledges. He should be allowed to continue to concentrate on educating our children, and putting lessons learned into better teaching practices, without having to endure anymore [sic] attacks and unproductive comments.”

The “attacks and unproductive comments” refer to the hate mail and anonymous phone calls that the Northwood principal has received since the incident was made known locally and internationally.

Assistant Principal Linda Wolf, who has worked at Northwood for seven years, called the hate mail “nasty and personal stuff.”

“The sad thing is that nobody wins from this,” she said in an interview with Patch. “The community has started becoming divided. I just feel bad that it’s caused a rift.”

READ MORE: PATCH.COM

TORAHin2 Now Doing Free Outbound Conference Calls As Zechus For Maran Rav Elyashiv

February 10th, 2012

When the founder of TORAHin2′s father was diagnosed with an illness, his family took upon themselves a number of different things in the merit of his refuah shelema. One project that they started was a short 2 minute conference call every morning, including all family members, to increase family love and learn a page in “Shmiras Haloshon Daily Lesson”.

In the beginning, there were some complications; including people forgetting to call in at the scheduled time, or had the wrong conference number or other reasons. To solve this issue, they developed a system that calls the members automatically, rather than them having to call in. So, at 9:15 each morning, all participants of the family get a phone call and are connected automatically just by answering the call. They say hello, then share a short lesson of the day, and bid each other goodbye until the next morning. All this in under 3 minutes!

In the zechus of a Refuah Shelema for Rav Elyashiv shlit”a, they are making this program available to the public and are sponsoring all costs. Groups of up to 15 people can sign up to start their own conference call in which they can share a daily lesson of Divrei Torah with their family or friends. The founders guarantee that it will create Achdus among your group.

TORAHin2 is a great way to connect families and friends together for just a couple of minutes a day to learn a Torah lesson and stay in touch. All you need is the phone numbers of your family members and a time to do your daily call.

To sign up for this program, please email Hadas@helpthisjew.com.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

‘Homeland Security’ Monitoring Internet For Anti-Govt Sentiment, Social Unrest

February 10th, 2012

A privacy advocacy group has swayed Congress to hold a hearing next week into the Department of Homeland Security’s practice of monitoring social networks such as Twitter and Facebook, as well as media reports and organizations, including The Drudge Report.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) recently obtained close to 300 pages of documents, as a result of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, detailing the federal agency’s “intelligence gathering” practices on the web.

Among the documents were guidelines from DHS instructing outside contractors to monitor the web for media reports and comments that “reflect adversely” on the agency or the federal government.

As Reuters reported last month, in early 2010 contractors were asked to spend 24 hours monitoring news media coverage on popular websites, including Facebook, Twitter, Hulu, WikiLeaks, as well as news sites including the Huffington Post and The Drudge Report.

The contractors were required to provide the DHS with feedback on any potential “threats and hazards”, as well as “any media reports that reflect adversely on the U.S. Government and the Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.) ability to prevent, protect and respond, to recovery efforts or activities related to any crisis or events which impact National Planning Scenarios.”

The documents also state that the program should highlight “both positive and negative reports on FEMA, C.I.A., C.B.P., ICE, etc., as well as organizations outside of D.H.S.”

READ MORE: INFO WARS

HaRav Zev Leff: Parshas Yisro

February 10th, 2012

The Art of Listening

 

Moses’ father-in-law Yisro, sheik of Midian, heard about all that G-d had done for Moses and His people Israel when He brought Israel out of Egypt (Shemos 18:1)

What did Yisro hear about that made him come? The splitting of the Sea and the war with Amalek (Rashi).

 

Considering that Matan Torah(the giving of the Torah) is the foundation of the entire world – both spiritual and physical – would it not have been proper for Chazal to designate a full sedrah to this occurrence alone? Why was the episode with Yisro not included in Beshalach? After all, the splitting of the Sea and the war with Amalek that Yisro heard about are both contained in that sedrah.

Even more difficult to understand is Rashi’s opinion that Yisro in fact did not join Bnei Yisraeluntil after the giving of the Torah. Why, then, did the Torah preface the giving of the Torah with Yisro’s arrival?

“And Yisro heard” (Shemos 18:1). The Zoharasks: “Did only Yiro hear and the whole world not hear? Is it not written, ‘the nations heard and shuddered?’ The answer is that the whole world heard and were not humbled, and Yisro heard and was humbled and was drawn close to fear Hashem.”

Many hear, but few really take to heart what they hear. As the Midrash Tanchuma(Yisro 2) puts it, “There are those that hear and lose, and those that hear and profit.” Hearing and listening properly are the key to one’s success in this world. The Midrash (Shemos Rabba 27:9) offers the following mashal on the verse, “Incline your ear and come to Me: hear and your soul shall live” (Yeshayahu 55:3)

So precious are the Jewish people to Hashem that He entices them. He said to them, “If one falls from a roof and his whole body is injured, and the doctor visits him and puts a bandage on his head, arms and legs, and all his body, he becomes totally enveloped in bandages. I am not like that. Man has two hundred and forty eight organs and one of them is the ear. If the whole body is sullied with sin, but the ear hears and listens, then the whole body receives life.

Before the Torah tells us, “And Hashem spoke,” we must first learn what it means to listen. Unless there is an ear to hear, even the most powerful message from the mouth of Hashem Himself is lost. For that reason, “Yisro heard,” precedes the giving of the Torah. Let us now investigate what proper hearing entails.

The Mechilta relates that prior to Matan Torahthe kings of the nations heard the thunderous sounds and gathered together to seek advice from Bilaam. They were concerned that Hashem was bringing another cataclysm – if not of water, then perhaps of fire – to detroy the world. Bilaam quieted their fears by telling them that Hashem was giving His people the Torah. The kings replied, “Hashem should bless his people with peace.”

Yisro heard the same thunderous noises and came to join the Jewish people and accept the Torah personally. In fact, the Mechilta relates, Yisro was the first person to exclaim ‘Baruch Hashem.’

The word baruch (blessed) connotes increase and strengthening. Moshe and Bnei Yisrael were so deeply inspired by the Exodus and the splitting of the Sea that they could not imagine the effect wearing off or dissipating. Although they profusely praised and thanked Hashem, they did not see the need to use the word “baruch;” they felt no need to ask Hashem to strengthen the effect of these miracles.

Yisro, however, realized that the effect of miracles can soon be dissipated if those effects are not somehow incorporated into one’s actions. He realized Amalek also heard of the splitting of the Sea, yet the impression quickly wore off and Amalek attacked Bnei Yisrael. Therefore Yisro appreciated the necessity to address Hashem with a beracha, an entreaty to intensify and increase the effect of the miracles already performed.

In contrast to Yisro, the kings of the nations were concerned personally only when they thought that the awesome sounds were harbingers of their doom. Once they were told that the sounds were the sounds of Torah, they immediately distanced themselves. They directed Hashem’s blessings to His people, but did not act as if they were personally implicated. There was nothing they felt that they could gain from these sounds. Only Yisro took these sounds as a personal message and directed his blessings to Hashem so that he might personally benefit from Matan Torah.

The entire nation saw the sounds” (Shemos 20:15). Hearing alone is indiscriminate; sound is received by the ear from all directions without the need to focus or turn. Vision, on the other hand, is dependent on opening one’s eyes and focusing on that which one wants to see. G-d’s words had to be heard with the same intense focus employed in sight. Bnei Yisraelphysically saw the sounds in order to aid their ability to listen properly.

Many sounds and sights reach our ears and eyes, but only one with the capacity to really focus can absorb their message. The Gemara relates that the turning point in the life of Rabbi Akiva was when he witnessed the erosion of a stone by water. Many observed the same thing, but only he derived the message: if water can erode stone, then Torah can change the heart. The whole world summons one with an attuned and attentive ear to the service of Hashem: “The heavens declare the glory of Hashem” (Tehillim 19:2). Look at the sky, listen to the ocean and acquire yiras shamayim: “My heart says to me in your name, ‘Seek out my face’” (Tehillim27:8)

If someone begins the Shema by repeating the word Shema twice, we silence him out of a concern that he seems to be addressing two deities (Berachos 33b). This is difficult to understand, for Shema refers to the one who is listening and not to Hashem. How then does it imply two deities? The answer is that the entire creation cries out the unity of Hashem. There is no multiplicity, only the one, unified voice of Hashem that calls out to man from all quarters. Any double hearing smacks of idolatry and duality.

Everyday a bas kol emanates from Mount Chorev and declares, “Woe to them, to the people, because of their insult to the Torah” (Pirkei Avos 6:2). The commentaries explain that the giving of the Torah did not stop, as it says, “A great sound that did not cease” (Devarim 5:19). One with an attuned ear hears the voice of Hasem giving the Torah continually, as the basis of all of creation. When the voice is not heard, then the bas kol(echo) goes out proclaiming the disgrace to Torah.

The Mechilita (see also Kiddushin 22b) describes the piercing of the earlobe of the Jewish slave as a punishment for his failure to hear and heed the ongoing commandment, “Do not steal.” It might be asked, however, why we pierce the earlobe, a mere piece of cartilage, and not the eardrum which failed to hear.

Chazal tell us that the outer ear serves as a funnel to collect the sound waves and direct them to the inner ear. The problem of the slave was not that he did not hear on Sinai that we are all to subjugate ourselves to Hashem alone. But he failed to hear the command as if it were directed to him and him alone. His outer ear failed to funnel those words to him, and thus bears the blemish. He heard G-d’s voice but did not experience it as if G-d was speaking to him.

“Kayin spoke with his brother Hevel, and when they were in the field, Kayin arose and smote Hevel, his brother” (Breishis 4:8). Many midrashim discuss what exactly Kayin said to Hevel. Ibn Ezra notes that according to the simple understanding of the verse, Kayin repeted to Hevel the admonition he had just heard from Hashem: “If you will improve, then you will be forgiven, and if not, the sin crouches by the entrance, and it desires you, but you can dominate it” (Breishis 4:7). How can these words of mussarto Hevel have led to murder? They should have prevented the murder.

Like most people, Kayin heard the mussar as directed at everybody but him. Since Hevel was the only person around, he assumed it was intended for him. So Kayin “said over” the mussar to Hevel rather than mulling over its implications for him. Not only did it fail to prevent the murder, but by suggesting to Kayin that Hevel was in need of mussar, it may have even aroused his animosity.

When I was younger and more naive, I assumed that my Shabbos drashah would be an effective medium to reach members of my congregation in need of reproof. Inevitably, the targeted individual(s) would approach me after davening and tell me, “Rabbi, you really gave it to them, I hope the ones who needed to hear got the message.” “Obviously,” I thought to myself, “they did not.”

Mussar is only effective if one takes it personally. Even if one hears it directly from Hashem Himself, as Kayin did, unless one recognizes that it is directed at him, the mussaris useless.

A truly sensitive person will always hear any reproof as directed at him or her. I once addressed a group of three hundred and fifty complete strangers in Johannesburg and spoke about modesty and the problems of certain forms of dress. After the shiur, I recevied the following note:

Dear Rabbi Leff,
I want to apologize for the manner in which I dressed for the shiur. I don’t usually wear this type of clothing, but in my rush to the shiur, I grabbed what was available. I know you were referring to me, and I promise not to repeat this error.
 

I was astounded that there could be a neshama so pure, to hear mussar directed to an audience of strangers as personalrebuke.

Chazal attribute another function to the earlobe. The Gemarra (Kesubos 5b) comments that earlobes are soft and flexible, so that if one is in a situation where someone is speaking lashon hara, he can bend his earlobe in as an earplug to avoid listening to the prohibited speech.

Since Chazal also say that the fingers are tapered to serve the same function of plugging up the ears to avoid hearing lashon hara, one wonders why both earlobes and tapered fingers are needed for the same function. Furthermore, why shouldn’t one just walk away and in that way avoid listening to lashon hara?

There are in fact three different types of speakers of lashon hara, and each one requires a different response. There are those who speak lashon haraconstantly, the professional gossips. One should have nothing to do with such people, and walking in the other direction when one sees them coming is indeed the preferred response.

The second type of lashon hara is that spoken by a basically good person, who from time to time slips into the trap of gossiping. he need not be avoided entirely. The preferred response is simply to prevent oneseslf from hearing the lashon hara. Tapered fingers distance the lashon harabut not the speaker.

There is yet a third type of lashon hara. Someone is asked concerning the honesty of a certain individual by someone else who is contemplating entering into a business relationship with him. The halacha is clear that if the individual being questioned knows the man to be dishonest, he must respond and relate exactly what he knows. (Of course, he must not exaggerate, or add information that was not solicited, or speak out of personal animus.) If a third party is present, who does not need to know this information, it is lashon hara with respect to him, and he must not listen. Putting his fingers in his ears would seem to imply that the information is intrinsically lashon hara and might wrongly discourage the one relating the information from continuing. By turning his earlobe, however, he signifies that this information is only lashon harawith respect to being funneled into his ears.

As we once again experience Matan Torah, with the reading of the sedrah of Yisro, let us learn from Yisro to attune our ears to hear the uninterrupted voice of Hashem, directed personally to each and every one of us from every quarter of creation.

Parsha Potpourri: Parshas Yisro

February 10th, 2012

Vayishma Yisro (18:1)

Rashi writes that Yisro was known by seven different names, each of which has a different meaning. One of the names is Yeser, which connotes the fact that he merited having a section added to the Torah as a result of his suggestion to Moshe in our parsha to appoint judges. However, he is universally referred to by the name Yisro, which refers to the fact that by converting to Judaism and accepting the mitzvos upon himself, an additional letter was added to his name. Of all of the 7 names, why is this one specifically the most important? Shouldn’t Yeser, the name which represents the fact that an entire section of the Torah was added as a result of his advice, be considered the most significant?

Rav Shlomo Margolis suggests that the selection of the name Yisro hints that as important as Torah study is and all the more so to add an entire portion to the Torah itself, nevertheless a person’s ultimate purpose in this world is to perfect himself and his character traits. This is reflected by Yisro’s desire to convert and ascend the spiritual ladder.

Rabbeinu Bechaye similarly notes (18:21) that in enumerating the desirable traits that Moshe should seek in judicial candidates, Yisro astoundingly made not a single mention of the importance of wisdom. Rather, he emphasized the importance of honesty and proper character, just as the Torah itself primarily praises Noach, Avrohom, and Yaakov for their righteous character traits.

The following story depicts a contemporary application of this principle. Rav Eliyahu Chaim Meisels was a great Torah scholar who served as the Rav of Lodz in Poland. He was renowned for his concern for the poor and downtrodden, and stories of his compassion on their behalf abound. He was once asked by his friend Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzenski, the Rav of Vilna and leading sage of the generation, why he never published a work of his Talmudic novellae as was common for scholars of his ilk.

Rav Meisels took out an old, tattered notebook and explained that this book, containing a detailed list of all of the charity and interest-free loans he had distributed throughout his lifetime, was the most important book that he could take with him to the next world. Shortly before Rav Chaim Ozer’s death, he commented that although his classic work Achiezer was indeed a masterpiece and worthy of the utmost respect, he now realized that Rav Meisels had been correct. The primary work he looked forward to taking with him to the World to Come wasn’t the book he authored with his pen, but the book he wrote with his deeds of chesed (kindness) for others.

Applying this lesson to ourselves, we realize that the Torah is teaching us a valuable and profound lesson. In our pursuit of personal greatness and maximizing our individual potentials, we certainly recognize the need to study and develop our minds. However, it is important to understand and remember that doing so is only part of a much larger quest to perfect our souls and inner characters.

Zachor es yom haShabbos l’kadsho sheishes yamim ta’avod v’asisa kol melachtecha v’yom hashevi’i Shabbos l’Hashem Elokecha lo sa’aseh kol melacha atah u’vincha u’vitecha avdecha v’amascha uv’hemtecha v’geircha asher bisharecha (20:8-10)

In the list of people who are prohibited from working on Shabbos, the Vilna Gaon notes that each of them begins with a connecting letter “vov” except for the servant. He therefore suggests a brilliant and original way of re-reading our verses based on a Gemora in Berachos (35b). The Gemora teaches that when a Jew does Hashem’s will, his work will be done for him by others, but when he transgresses Hashem’s will, he will have to do his own work.

We can now interpret as follows: a person who only remembers Shabbos in his mind (Zachor es yom haShabbos l’kadsho) but doesn’t observe its laws in action will have to work hard, as the verse continues: Sheishes yamim ta’avod v’asisa kol melachtecha – six days he shall work and do all of his labor.

On the other hand, if a person doesn’t merely think about Shabbos but actually keeps its laws and makes it Holy (V’yom hashevi’i Shabbos l’Hashem Elokecha), he and his family members won’t even have to work during the week – lo sa’aseh kol melacha atah u’vincha u’vitecha. If so, one may ask, how will he possibly live and who will take care of him if he and his family never do any work? To allay that concern, the Torah replies that there will be others – such as servants and foreigners – to do his work for him, as the connecting “vov” is left out to indicate that this is a new list and a separate category – avdecha v’amascha uv’hemtecha v’geircha asher bisharecha.

V’lo sa’aleh b’ma’alos al mizbechi (20:23)

Parshas Yisro is one of the most well-known and dramatic portions in the Torah. It contains the details of the giving of the Torah at Mount Sinai, which cemented our relationship as Hashem’s chosen nation. While one would expect the parsha containing such an important and lofty event in Jewish history to end on an inspirational note, it instead ends anticlimactically with the seemingly mundane commandment to build the Altar in the Temple using a ramp instead of steps. Why was this mitzvah selected to conclude the parsha of the giving of the Torah, and what deeper lesson does it convey?

A number of commentators answer by pointing out that the difference between ascending a ramp and climbing up stairs is that it is possible to for an object which is placed on the steps to rest and stand still, whereas doing so on the ramp will cause it to fall down. In other words, the Torah concludes the parsha by symbolically teaching us that the key to climbing in our service of Hashem is to view spiritual growth as a continual process from which we can never take a break, as doing so will result in an immediate decline in our spiritual level.

Parshas Re’eh begins, “See, I place before you today a blessing and a curse” (Devorim 11:26). The Seforno points out that there is no neutral middle option, only the two extremes of blessing and curse. He explains that the Jewish people are not like the other nations of the world, who are often content with mediocrity. The Torah tells us that if at any time we are not actively choosing to do mitzvos to earn Hashem’s blessings, we will automatically be in the category of curses, as there is no middle ground.

The yetzer hara (evil inclination) tries to prevent us from learning Torah and doing mitzvos. After it has failed, one of its tactics is to try to convince us that we have already accomplished so much that we can take it easy and rest on our laurels. Therefore, the parsha in which we received the Torah ends by reminding us that we can never become stagnant and complacent in our service of Hashem, which will cause us to fall down the ramp and wipe out our good accomplishments, an insight which should strengthen and encourage us to consistently strive to grow higher and higher.

Answers to the weekly Points to Ponder are now available!
To receive the full version with answers email the author at oalport@optonline.net.

Parsha Points to Ponder (and sources which discuss them):

1)     Moshe named his first son Gershom to commemorate the fact that he was a sojourner in Midian, a strange land (18:3). He called his second son Eliezer to express his gratitude to Hashem for rescuing him from Pharaoh’s sword (18:4). As he fled to Midian only after being saved from Pharaoh, wouldn’t it have been more appropriate to reverse the names to reflect the order in which the events occurred? (Ohr HaChaim HaKadosh, Darash Moshe)

2)     Upon encountering Yisro, Moshe related to him the miracles which Hashem performed in smiting Pharaoh and the Egyptians (18:8). What was Moshe’s purpose in doing so when Yisro had already heard of their punishments (18:1), and this was actually his motivation for coming to convert? (Ohr HaChaim HaKadosh, Darkei Mussar, Nesivos Rabboseinu, Ayeles HaShachar)

3)     Rashi writes (19:3) that Hashem instructed Moshe to speak to the women about accepting the Torah before the men. Wouldn’t it have been more appropriate to discuss it first with the men? (Shemos Rabbah 28:2, Beis HaLevi, Mishmeres Ariel)

4)     The Rambam (Hilchos Geneivah 1:3) explains that while there are two words to describe a thief, a ganav is one who steals without the knowledge of the owner and a gazlan is a person who brazenly steals in the presence of the owner. Rashi writes (20:13) that the prohibition in the 10 Commandments against stealing refers to the theft of another person. As kidnapping is generally done with the knowledge of the person being taken, wouldn’t it have been more accurate to write “lo sigzol: instead of “lo signov”? (Shu”t Rav Betzalel Ashkenazi 39, M’rafsin Igri, Eebay’ei L’hu)

  © 2011 by Oizer Alport.

Vertluch: Parshas Yisro

February 10th, 2012

As klal Yisroel advances towards Har Sinai to receive the Torah, Yisro hears about all the miracles that Hashem had performed to the yidden and decides to jump on the bandwagon. The pasuk informs us that Yisro comes to Moshe, with his wife and children, as the pasuk says ‘And her two sons, one of whom was named Gershom, because Moshe said, “I was a stranger in a foreign land. And one who was named Eliezer, because Moshe said, The God of my father came to my aid and rescued me from Pharaoh’s sword.’ (18; 3, 4)

To begin, the pasuk seems out of order chronologically.Why did Moshe feel it necessary to name his children in that order? The incident of being saved from Pharaoh’s sword occurred before he was a Ger in a foreign land.

Furthermore, why does the Torah feel the need to mention again the reasoning behind name of Gershom, being that it was already mentioned in parshas Shemos? (2, 22) The pasuk could’ve just read that Yisro approached Moshe with ‘his two sons…’ without any detail. Why did the Torah feel it important to inform us again why Moshe chose the names for his sons?
Meshech Chochma says that the reason why the Torah mentioned how Moshe selected the names was to reveal the incredible ma’aleh was on. Moshe developed such a strong kesher towards bnei Yisroel even though he barely knew them. He grew up in a palace full of luxuries and had everything he wanted at his fingertips, brought to him on a silver platter. He was not involved in the day to day enslavement of the rest of klal Yisroel. What’s more is that when Moshe eventually went to Midyan, Yisro was also a king and he continued living the high life when he settled there. Wherever he found himself, he attracted himself to a rich and famous environment even though bnei Yisroel was going through terrible hardships. Despite all this, he called himself a Ger. Why? Because all the while that bnei Yisroel were in Mitzrayim, he felt connected to Mitzrayim and considered Mitzrayim to be his home. The country that his people were in was his country. He could not celebrate his own personal salvation while knowing that klal Yisroel was suffering in Mitzrayim. Moshe couldn’t name his first son Eliezer (with the reasoning of ‘The God of my father came to my aid and rescued me from Pharaoh’s sword’) while knowing and feeling the travesties that klal Yisroel were enduring. The initial thought and feeling that Moshe had, was the suffering of his nation and how he longed to be amongst them.

It is for this reason, despite being in Midyan for a long period of time, that he always had Mitzrayim on his mind. He couldn’t consider himself a Midyan guy while his people were in Mitzrayim.

We learn from this here how a person has to be able to feel for another Yid. Just because it’s not happening to ‘me’ doesn’t give us the right to ignore someone else’s hardships. We have to strive to continuously try to feel and share in other people’s misfortunes. Just as Moshe always considered himself a stranger because his beloved people were enslaved and going through terrible hardships.

May we all be zoche to feel for our fellow Yid until the achdus is so strong that there is nothing holding back the coming of Moshiach, b’karov.

HAVE A GREAT SHABBOS