Archive for the ‘Torah Corner’ Category

Parsha Potpourri: Parshas Vayeira

Friday, October 18th, 2013

Yukach na me’at mayim … v’ekcha pas lechem v’sa’adu lib’chem (18:4-5)

Avrohom excelled in the mitzvah of hosting guests. Three days after he had circumcised himself at the age of 99, Hashem didn’t want Avrohom to burden himself with caring for guests. He brought a heat wave to deter all travelers on that day. Still, the weak Avrohom’s greatest concern was that the unusually hot weather would deny him the merit of welcoming guests. Avrohom decided to sit at the entrance of his tent in the hopes that he might spy a stray traveler.

When Hashem saw Avrohom’s suffering over the lack of guests, He sent three angels in the guise of people. Rejoicing at this improbable turn of events, the elderly and weak Avrohom ran to personally invite them to his home to serve them. Avrohom proceeded to serve them a lavish and abundant feast with one exception: although he was generous with all of the other courses, he instructed that only a small amount of water be brought for them. As caring for guests was Avrohom’s raison d’?tre and he was so generous with all of the other portions, why was he so stingy when it came to the water?

The following story will help us answer this question. On one of his travels, Rav Yisroel Salanter spent Shabbos in a small village. The locals were excited about the opportunity to host the renowned Rabbi in their community and to learn from his pious ways. When the time came to wash his hands prior to the meal, his hosts were surprised to notice that he used a very small amount of water.

Worried that they had done something wrong or offended the Rav in some way, they respectfully asked for an explanation of his behavior. Rav Yisroel explained that the water in this village was drawn from a distant well. Carrying the water over this long distance was a very difficult task. Although he was normally accustomed to washing his hands with more water in the legally preferable manner, in this case it would be inappropriate to do so at the expense of the water-carrier.

In light of this story, the Darkei Mussar explains that almost all of the preparations for the meal were performed by Avrohom. The actions which he did on behalf of the guests were done with great alacrity and revealed a giving spirit. The water, on the other hand, was the one item which Avrohom asked somebody else to bring. As much as he wanted to offer the guests generous portions, he understood, as did Rav Yisroel, that it would be inappropriate to do so at someone else’s expense.

The commandments are traditionally divided into two categories: those between man and Hashem, and those between man and his fellow man. As piety is often associated with the mitzvos in the first group, it is sadly all too easy and natural for somebody wishing to demonstrate his religious devotion to emphasize this type at the expense of the commandments governing our interpersonal relationships. In reality, our forefather Avrohom teaches us that true piety requires recognizing that both classes emanate equally from Hashem and must be balanced accordingly.

Vayomer Hashem el Avrohom lamah zeh tzachaka Sorah leimor ha’af umnam eileid va’ani zakanti (18:13)

Upon hearing the blessing of the angels that she would merit to give birth to a child one year later, Sorah laughed in wondrous disbelief and questioned how she and her elderly husband could possibly conceive a child. Hashem responded by challenging Avrohom regarding Sorah’s lack of belief in His ability to perform miracles. Why did Hashem question Avrohom regarding his wife’s behavior instead of rebuking Sorah directly?

When Rav Chaim Soloveitchik was a young boy, his father (the Beis HaLevi) hired for him a private teacher to allow him to diligently progress in his Torah learning. The tutor quickly recognized the genius of his student and was eager to show off the young prodigy. As the teacher was a chossid of the Slonimer Rebbe, he decided to take his prot?g? to visit his Rebbe.

After they entered and were seated, the Slonimer Rebbe gave an apple to the young Chaim, who proceeded to take a voracious bite without first making a blessing. The Rebbe voiced his disapproval to his chossid, noting that if he were a better teacher, his student would understand the importance of reciting a blessing before eating. The young Chaim rejoined by passing the buck one step higher and impudently suggesting that if the Rebbe were on a higher level, his chassidim would be better teachers, who in turn would have better students!

The Darkei Mussar similarly suggests that Hashem understood that Sorah’s knowledge and beliefs were learned from Avrohom. If she demonstrated a deficiency in her emunah and bitachon (faith and trust), she must have subconsciously picked it up through observing Avrohom. It was for this reason that Hashem transferred the ultimate blame to Avrohom and approached him to demand an explanation.

Vayashkeim Avrohom ba’boker el ha’makom asher amad sham es p’nei Hashem (19:27)

The Gemora in Berachos (6b) teaches that if a person establishes a fixed place for his prayers, the G-d of Avrohom will assist him, and when he dies, he is mourned as a humble and pious disciple of Avrohom Avinu. What is the link between Avrohom and instituting a set location for prayer? The Torah records that Avrohom woke up in the morning and returned to the place where he had stood before Hashem. The Gemora interprets “standing” as a reference to prayer; in other words, the verse is emphasizing that Avrohom came to pray in the same place that he had prayed previously. Nevertheless, the deeper intention of this statement of the Gemora seems difficult to understand. What is the connection between humility and establishing a fixed place for prayer?

The Mishnah in Avos (5:22) teaches that a person who possesses three traits – a good eye, a humble spirit, and a meek soul – is classified as one of the students of Avrohom Avinu, while those who have three opposite qualities – an evil eye, an arrogant spirit, and a greedy soul – are considered disciples of the wicked Bilaam.

In Parshas Balak, Balak took Bilaam to a location from which they could see part of the Jewish encampment, and they prepared seven altars and seven bulls and seven rams to be offered upon them in an attempt to receive Divine permission to curse the Jewish people (Bamidbar 22:41-23:3). When their efforts were unsuccessful, they proceeded to a new location with the hope that their quest to curse the Jewish people would succeed there (23:13). When Hashem once again denied Bilaam permission to curse the Jews in this new place, they traveled to a third location, hoping that now it would be proper in Hashem’s eyes to allow Bilaam to utter his curses (23:27). Each time, Bilaam and Balak attributed their lack of success not to themselves and their wicked ways, but rather to the location, thereby relieving themselves of any guilt or responsibility for the undesirable outcome.

This stands in direct contrast to the conduct of Avrohom, who stood in intense prayer beseeching Hashem on behalf of the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah and negotiating the number of righteous people who would be required to save them from destruction, only to see his efforts for naught, as Hashem proceeded to obliterate Sodom and Gomorrah and their inhabitants, sparing only Lot and his family. Nevertheless, after seeing that his prayers were ineffective, the Torah stresses that Avrohom proceeded the following morning to return to the exact place where he had unsuccessfully prayed the day before. In his humility, Avrohom did not attempt to come up with excuses and scapegoats for the inefficacy of his prayers, but rather blamed himself for not praying with enough intensity, and there was therefore no reason for him to choose a new place as Bilaam did.

Similarly, many people today attempt to justify their lack of kavana (concentration) in prayer by blaming it on peripheral causes, such as the conduct of people sitting nearby, the discomfort of the seat, or other distracting factors. As a result, they constantly switch seats in pursuit of the perfect spot, where they will finally be able to pray without being interrupted or disturbed. However, this is the approach of Bilaam, as the Gemora teaches that the humble students and descendants of Avrohom understand that “the buck stops here” and establish a fixed place for their prayers. In that merit, they should enjoy the reward promised by the Mishnah to Avrohom’s students: enjoying the fruits of their good deeds in this world and inheriting the World to Come.

Answers to the weekly Points to Ponder are now available!
To receive the full version with answers email the author at oalport@optonline.net.
Parsha Points to Ponder (and sources which discuss them):

1) Because she violated she commandment not to look back at the destruction of Sodom, Lot’s wife turned into a pillar of salt (19:26). Did she first die and then become a pillar of salt, or did the transformation occur while she was still alive? (Shu”t Igros Moshe Yoreh Deah Vol. 1 230:8)

2) After Avrohom sent Hagar and Yishmael away with bread and a flask of water, the Torah records (21:14) that they became lost in the desert. Rashi writes that Hagar didn’t merely stray from the physical path through the desert, but now that she was away from his influence, she immediately abandoned his teachings and reverted to the idolatrous beliefs she had learned from her father. As the Torah only states that Hagar lost her way in the desert, from where did Rashi derive this additional fact, which seems to have no textual basis? (Lev Shalom)

3) Did Avrohom sleep the night before setting out with Yitzchok for the Akeidah (22:3)? (Har Tzvi, Nesivos Rabboseinu, Ayeles HaShachar 20:8)

© 2013 by Oizer Alport.

Vertluch: Parshas Vayeira

Friday, October 18th, 2013

When Hashem was preparing to eradicate Sedom, He made a decision to inform Avraham of His plans. He told Avraham that they were an appalling and corrupt people and that the only way to put a stop to it was to obliterate the entire city. Avraham acted as a defender for Sedom and asked Hashem if he woould spare the city’s destruction should he find fifty righteous people within. Hashem answered that he would, and as we saw from the pasukim fifty righteous individuals were not found. He then proceeded to inquire about forty five people and then forty and then thirty and twenty and ten etc…

There seems to be a discrepancy in the loshon that is used in the pasuk. When Avraham asked Hashem to save Sedom should He find either forty or thirty tzadikim, the pasuk used a loshon of ‘lo e’eseh’, I will not do anything. Why? Because the zechusim of fifty tzadikim was significant enough to hold back the wrath of Hashem. But when Avraham asked Hashem if He can find either twenty or ten people the pasuk says ‘lo ashchis’, I will not destroy. That implied that there would be some type of calamity but that Hashem will not completely wipe out the city. This was due to the fact that there was not a significant amount of tzadikim there to hold back Hashems wrath. However, by forty five people the pasuk used the same loshon of ‘lo ashchis’, I will not destroy, that was used by twenty or thirty people. Given the amount of tzadikim there, shouldn’t the pasuk have used the loshon of ‘lo e’eseh’, I will not do anything, just as it used it by forty and thirty?

The Meshech Chochma answers with a yesod for us all to learn from.

In Pirkei Avos it says ‘know who will you stand before and before whom you will give a DIN and CHESHBON’. What are these two things? Din, as we know, is judgment. What is cheshbon? The GR“A writes that cheshbon is that you get punished not only for the misdeed you committed but also for the mitzvah you could’ve done and did not carry out. These are the two elements in every judgment. One is that you did the actual misdeed and the second is that you did not do a mitzvah.

Now make the following computation. Avraham says ‘maybe there are forty five tzadikim in Sedom…’ forty five divided by five, for the five cities within Sedom, comes out that there are nine righteous people for each of the five cities. Says the Meschech Chochma, if that scenario is true-that there were only nine tzadikim in every city-then they were only one short. Every person, besides those nine, could have been the tenth man had they applied themselves. Becoming the tenth tzaddik, could have saved an entire city. Yet, nobody moved and no one changed! At forty five people the punishment was more severe, because the Ribono Shel Olam took into consideration that each person had the responsibility to be the tenth tzaddik. From the fact of reality that they didn’t, their penalty was much greater. If there were forty people and each city only had eight tzadikim then people would be able to say even if I’m the ninth, how do I know there will be a tenth? But by nine tzadikim no one felt the urge and desire to improve themselves and to save the city. Therefore, their punishment was greater.

Every person has to understand that what they do can affect more people than they think. If someone has the opportunity to participate in the enhancement of kovod shem shomayim and its attainable, yet he decided to pass on it, that creates destruction. They had nine people in the city! There should have been one person-just one- who felt a responsibility to be the tenth to be mekadesh shem shomayim!

May we all be zoche to not only realize when opportunities are knocking at our door but to also grab and act on them; and IY”H by doing so we can prevent future misfortune in the world.

Rabbi Krakowski: Parshas Vayeira

Thursday, October 17th, 2013

This week’s Sedra contains one of the most perplexing portions of the Torah. Avraham Avinu, who preached against human sacrifice at a time when this was a widely accepted practiced, Avraham who had waited for so long for his son Yitzchak, was now being commanded by Hashem to offer him as a sacrifice.

Chazal explain that although Hashem commanded Avraham to bring Yitzchak as an offering he never actually asked him to sacrifice Yitzchak. Keeping this in mind, it is also possible to understand why Hashem made such a demand from Avraham. The meaning of the word ‘Nissayon’ is a ‘test’. However, to test someone it is necessary to challenge that person. In order to challenge Avraham, who was prepared to do anything for Hashem, Hashem had to ask Avraham to go against everything for which he stood. Hashem in effect demanded from Avraham to trust in Him purely for the sake of trusting Hashem.

Nonetheless this whole episode is complex, and requires much explanation.

The Midrash complicates matters even more by adding the following details. The Midrash explains that Yitzchak was completely aware of his father’s intent to slaughter him as a sacrifice, but was nevertheless prepared to comply if this was God’s will. The Midrash also tells us, that while Avraham and Yitzchak where on their way to the Akeida, the Satan approached first Avraham Avinu and tried in various manners to dissuade him from offering Yitzchak. Failing there, he tried his luck on Yitzchak and here too at first, met the same fate as he had with Avraham. In another, final attempt, he managed to cause Yitzchak a bit of hesitation. One would think that the Satan’s argument to dissuade Yitzchak would be philosophical or ethical. To the contrary, he came with an argument that appears to be sophomoric.

The Satan first argued that it couldn’t possibly be God’s Will for him to be sacrificed. Yitzchak’s retort was that if Hashem so commanded his father, so be it. The Satan then argued: ‘if you were sacrificed and hence ceased to be, your enemy Yishmael would take everything which that is now yours for himself. Not only would he be the only heir to your father, but he would also grab even the toys that your mother made for you.’ The Midrash tells us that at the mention of Yishmael’s taking the toys his mother made for him, Yitzchak began to hesitate.

What is going on? Our great Yitzchak Avinu is ready to give up his life for Hashem, but the mention of his childhood toys is making him hesitate?

Taking a closer look at the Midrash, we notice that the Satan emphasizes “that your mother made”. The Satan wasn’t worrying Yitzchak about mere toys, but rather inducing him to become concerned with his mother’s feelings, with his mother’s sentiments. Yitzchak reckoned more with his compassion for others than with anything else. His own life and possibly his eternity were at stake, yet he still had not the slightest hesitation to perform Hashem’s will. However, the mere possibility of causing his mother emotional distress did make him hesitate, even if only briefly.

Our forefather Yitzchak put the needs of others before all else.

A-Gut Shabbos, Rabbi Y. Dov Krakowski.

HaRav Zev Leff: Parshas Lech Lecha

Friday, October 11th, 2013

Abram took Sarai his wife and his nephew Lot, and all their wealth that they had amassed, and the people they had acquired in Charan; and they embarked for the land of Canuan, and they came to the land of Canaan (Bereishis 12:5).

They brought them under the wings of the Divine Presence. Avraham converted the men, and Sarah converted the women (Rash) to Bereishis 12 5).

World history, Chazal tell us, is divided into three periods, each lasting two thousand years. The first is called the era of tobu vavobu (void and nothingness), the second the era of Torah, and the third the Messianic Era. Chazal identify the beginning of the era of Torah with Avraham’s conversion of the idol worshipers of Charan into believers in God.

The question arises Why did Chazal view this event as ushering in the era of Torah? After all, the Torah pre-existed Creation and was the blueprint for Creation. Adam and Noach learned Torah long before Avraham was born, and Shem and Ever even set up a yeshivah.

In order to answer this question, we must first understand Avraham’s unique role in the transmission of knowledge of Hashem. Raavad (to Hilchos Avodah Zarah 1 3) asks why Avraham alone of all the righteous people of his generation and the preceding ten generations is credited with influencing the masses. Surely the others also protested against idolatry and rebuked their wayward contemporaries. He answers that while the other tzaddikim admonished their contemporaries, they were not able to break the idols because the idol worshipers hid them. Only Avraham was able to find the idols.

Raavad’s words are difficult to understand. Was Avraham Avinu, then, only a better detective than the other tzaddikim, and thus able to ferret out the hidden idols? Moreover, what does Raavad mean that they hid their idols? Nimrod and his cohorts publicly worshiped idols and idol manufacturers, like Avraham’s father, carried on a brisk, open trade.

To understand Raavad we need a deeper understanding of ancient idolatry. Rambam explains that the original idol worship was a well intentioned mistake. Just as one honors the king by honoring his emissaries, so did the generation of Enosh worship various natural phenomena, which God had invested with certain powers, as a means of honoring the Creator of those phenomenon. Their mistake lay in failing to recognize that showing respect to the king’s emissary is only a form of honoring the king when he is absent. But when he is present, it is tantamount to rebellion. Since Hashem is always present, the worship of His creations is always a diminution of Him: Don’t accept any other powers in My presence” (Devarim 5:7).

The two thousand year period preceding the era of Torah is described as tobu vavobu-an era of confusion, of light and dark mixed together and not easily delineated one from the other. With the sin of Adam, the relative terms good and evil, replaced the absolutes of truth and falsehood. The various shades of good and evil became a confusing admixture.

The Torah, by contrast, distinguishes absolutely between pure and impure, light and darkness, life and death “Behold I have placed before you today life and good, and death and evil” (Devarim 30:15). Only the Torah allows us to separate the light from darkness, to perceive good as absolute truth and evil as absolute falsehood.

The confusion introduced by Adam’s sin became the principal tool of the yetzer hara (evil inclination). As the Baal Shem Tov explains, the Satan will be held culpable in the future not for attempting to seduce man into sin-that is his function-but rather for making the sin appear as a mitzvah. Thus we tell ourselves when we sleep late and miss davening with a minyan that our sleep is a mitzvah and our intention is only to learn Torah with a clearer head that day. This is the tobu vavobu of the yetzer hara. Torah is the remedy.

The idol worshipers of Avraham’s generation did not hide their idolatry physically, but spiritually. They masked it as righteousness and honor to God. They created ideologies to cloak their sins in light and virtue. Prior to Avraham no one was able to expose the sham, to delineate the light and darkness. This failure prevented them from exercising any lasting influence on those they admonished. They could not break the idols.

Only Avraham saw the light and darkness in their true perspective and conveyed this to the masses. He exposed evil for what it was and thereby transformed the idol worshipers into believers in God. Avraham’s life work, then, was the beginning of the era of Torah, the delineation of light and darkness.

Since Avraham’s unique ability was to distinguish between light and darkness, he could welcome into his house wanderers who bowed to the dust of their feet, yet found it necessary to distance himself from his nephew Lot. His very resemblance to Lot made it imperative that he separate himself so as not to confuse his true righteousness with Lot’s apparent righteousness. “Separate yourself from me,” Avraham told Lot, “for we are brothers.” Rashi explains the term “brothers”-”They looked alike.”

Lot was the personification of tobu vavobu. On the one hand, he appeared to be righteous like Avraham he baked matzos and invited in guests, even at risk to himself. But, in fact, the jumble of darkness pervaded his life he chose to live among the wicked people of Sodom, lured by the wealth he saw there. Lot’s admixture of good and evil represented the antithesis of Avraham’s mission in this world. Hence, Avraham had to separate from him.

Of all the non-kosher animals, the pig has always symbolized impurity for the Jewish people precisely because it bears the external sign of a kosher animal, cloven feet. It is the kosher feet that make it the most loathsome of the non-kosher animals. So, too, the most dangerous ideologies are those that succeed in garbing themselves in an aura of piety and righteousness, that claim the mantle of Torah and authentic Judaism, but are in essence total distortions of the Torah.

As descendants of Avraham, who introduced the era of Torah, it is our task to toil in Torah to discern truth from falsehood, light from darkness, the holy from the profane.

Parsha Potpourri: Parshas Lech Lecha

Friday, October 11th, 2013

Vayehi ka’asher hikriv la’vo Mitzraymah vayomer el Sarai ishto hinei na yadati ki isha yefas mareh at (12:11)

Due to a famine in the land of Canaan, Avrohom and Sorah decided to travel to Egypt. As they approached the border between the two countries, Avrohom became aware of Sorah’s beauty and began to fear that the Egyptians would want to marry her and would kill him in order to do so. Why did he suddenly become aware of her beauty at this time?

Rashi explains that due to their tremendous modesty, Avrohom had never looked at her and was unaware of her attractive appearance. At this time, something occurred which caused him to look at her for the first time, and he recognized her beauty. Why does the Torah emphasize the seemingly irrelevant geographical fact that this occurred as they drew close to Egypt, and as there are no coincidences in even the most minute details of events, why did Hashem cause this to occur at this time?

Although we are unable to relate to it, Avrohom was on such a high level in spirituality and modesty that he felt it appropriate to be married solely for the sake of Heaven and not to even look at his wife, a practice which he successfully upheld for decades. The Noda BiYehuda notes that this is even more remarkable in light of the teaching of the Gemora in Megillah (15a) that Sorah was one of the four most beautiful women in the history of the world, a reputation of which he was surely aware, and yet with tremendous self-control elected not to have any benefit from.

The Rambam writes (Hilchos Deios 6:1) that a person is naturally influenced by his surroundings. The Egyptians were a nation more immoral and depraved than any other, excelling in their passion for illicit relationships (Rashi Vayikra 18:3). Rav Moshe Wolfson explains that as Avrohom approached the Egyptian border – even before he crossed it – he was negatively influenced by the immorality which permeated the very air of Egypt, which caused him to fall from his great heights of personal modesty, and for the first time he glanced at his wife’s beauty.

The recognition of the effect one’s surroundings can have on even the greatest of men should serve as a lesson for us, who have much farther to fall, about the importance of dwelling and spending our leisure time in environments which are conducive to Torah values.

Vayomer Ado-nai Hashem ba’eh eid’ah ki irashena (15:8)

The Gemora in Berachos (7b) derives from our verse that Avrohom was the first person in history to call Hashem Adon – Master. The author of a new commentary on the Siddur brought his manuscript to the Vilna Gaon to receive his comments and to request a letter of approbation. The Gaon began to examine the work and noticed an original insight explaining why the morning prayers begin with Adon Olam (Master of the World).

The Gemora in Berachos (26b) teaches that each of the Avos instituted one of the three daily prayers: Avrohom enacted Shacharis, Yitzchok originated Mincha, and Yaakov introduced Maariv. As the morning prayers were instituted by Avrohom, who was the first person to refer to Hashem as Adon, we therefore begin Shacharis with Adon Olam. Upon reading this, the Gaon was overcome with joy and remarked that if only for the beauty and truth of this one insight, the publication of the entire work would be justified.

In a similar vein, the Meshech Chochmah explains why we are accustomed to wear a Tallis and Tefillin only during the morning prayers, even though both mitzvos are applicable the entire day. After miraculously defeating the armies of the four kings, Avrohom brought back all of the people and possessions which had been taken captive. The King of Sodom suggested that Avrohom return to him the people while keeping the possessions for himself. Lest the wicked king of Sodom take credit for making him rich, Avrohom refused to accept any gifts, emphatically swearing (14:23) that he wouldn’t accept even a thread or a shoestrap. The Gemora in Sotah (17a) teaches that in the merit of this statement, Avrohom’s descendants received the mitzvos of Tallis and Tefillin. Although they may be worn the entire day, because we merited receiving them through the actions of Avrohom, we are accustomed to commemorate this by wearing them during the morning prayers which he instituted.

Answers to the weekly Points to Ponder are now available!
To receive the full version with answers email the author at oalport@optonline.net.
Parsha Points to Ponder (and sources which discuss them):

1) A person who sees a large and impressive lake recites the blessing Oseh Ma’aseh Bereishis – Who makes the work of Creation (Orach Chaim 228:1). However, this is only the case if the lake was created in that location at the time the world was formed, but not if it was subsequently formed through the actions of man (Mishnah Berurah 228:6). Does one who sees the Dead Sea recite this blessing, as the Torah seems to indicate that it was only created in the time of Avrohom (Rashi 14:3), but the Gemora in Bava Basra (74b) seems to indicate that it was one of the 7 lakes which was formed at the time of Creation to surround the land of Israel? (Ayeles HaShachar, Shu”t Shevet HaLevi 9:47, Nimukei Orach Chaim 228, Piskei Teshuvos 228:3)

2) Who was the father of Avrohom’s servant Eliezer (15:2)? (Targum Yonason ben Uziel 14:14)

3) Why didn’t Avrohom make a festive meal to celebrate the circumcision of himself and his son Yishmael as he did on the day of Yitzchok’s circumcision (21:8)? (Chavatzeles HaSharon)

© 2013 by Oizer Alport.

Vertluch: Parshas Lech lecha

Friday, October 11th, 2013

The end of this week’s parsha discusses that Hashem gave us the commandment of bris milah and how Avraham and Yishmael were both circumcised.

Dovid HaMelech writes (Tehillim 119) ‘sus anochi al imrasecha k’motzei shalal rav’. We can loosely translate it to mean: ‘I rejoice over your words like someone who finds an abundance of spoils.’

Gemara in Shabbos (130) explains that the aforementioned pasuk refers to the mitzvah of milah, that it is done b’simcha.

Why are we so happy that we refer to it as ‘shalal’; as war spoils? Why do we not compare our excitement to that of finding an expensive object or the like? Why specifically shalal?

Meshech Chochma offers a beautiful idea.

Gemara in Sota (21a) says that when someone performs a mitzvah they are protected from harm but only while they are drawn into it. Once they have finished and are no longer involved, it no longer protects. However, Torah on the other hand works differently. All the while someone is involved and living a life and learning of Torah, they are protected. Although you may not be learning this exact moment they are still being guarded by Torah. The Torah was created as a tavlin to the yetzer hara; it is the medicine that diminishes his power that permits us to sin. When a person walks down the street and finds an object of value, they are no doubt excited because it’s something new for them. But imagine walking down the street and finding your enemies weapon lying there. There will undoubtfully be an added element of excitement! Why? Because your taking away your enemy’s lifeline.

Says R’ Meir Simcha, this is what Dovid HaMelech meant when he said ‘sus anochi al imrasecha k’motzei shalal rav’. Now we understand why we refer to it as a shalal because through our Torah we are stripping the enemy of his weapon.
The same is true by milah. Why do we refer to it as a shalal?

The Rambam in Moreh Nevuchim says that the reason for milah is to minimize mans desires. By cutting away some urlah we are taking away from mans desires and therefore we refer to milah as a shalal because there’s a different element of simcha there too when you cut away some urlah.

Life is full of trials and tribulations and of the many of them are physical and earthly desires. But the Ribono Shel Olam through His immeasurable kindness already paved a way for us to allow us to overcome it; He began the process. By strengthening our limud haTorah-and showing Him we appreciate all He has done for us-we will be protected from harms ways and strive to greatness so that we can merit of the coming of Moshiach speedily in our days.

HAVE A GREAT SHABBOS

Rabbi Krakowski: Parshas Lech Lecha

Friday, October 11th, 2013

Hashem announces to Avrohom that Sarah Imeinu will have a child he will be considered his only eternal child. Hashem explains that only this child (from Sara Imeinu) will eventually get Eretz Yisroel. Avrohom argues with Hashem and says: Hashem let it suffice that I have Yishmael and let him live on as my eternal heir (17: 15-18).this entire episode leaves us baffled with the question what is going on? Hashem tells Avraham seemingly the best news and instead of rejoicing Avraham seems to object.

Hashem doesn’t seem to answer Avraham’s question rather only reasserts His previous statement: Sarah will give birth to Yitzchok and he will be your prodigy. Hashem also adds that Yishmael as well will become a great nation; that Yishmael would be twelve tribes.

The Ohr-HaChaim in the beginning of the parsha comments that the Nevuah/ prophecy of Avrohom was different than that of all other Neviem/prophets. Usually Hashem would first show to the neviyim a vague Nevuah and only afterwards explain its specifics whereas Avrohom received his Nevuah in a regular clear cut way.

The Ohr-HaChaim suggests two possible answers. The first answer he gives is that Avrohom was indeed different from all other prophets. While all others started with knowledge of Hashem, His Torah, and His mitzvos, Avrohom didn’t. Avrohom worked on his very own to find and understand Hashem. Avrohom therefore recognized Hashem much clearer than all others. Hence, Avrohom merited having Devine revelation in verbal form, thus being more vivid.

Avrohom Aveinu’s adherence to Torah and Mitzvos was based on his understanding of Hashem and His Will. Avrohom’s every act was based on his own understanding of Hashems Will.

Avrohom had finally come to terms with the fact that Sarah Imeinu wasn’t going to have children. He therefore understood that he would have to have a choild from a different union. Avrohom’s willingness to have a relationship with Hagar was only in order to have a child. Avrohom was willing to live with Hagar for the sake of having Am-Yisroel. Hashem after all this tells Avrohom: no. Hashem tells Avrohom that Sarah will give birth to a son Yitzchok, and that through Yitzchok will his lineage stem. Avrohom Avinu is baffled, he is all of a sudden void of understanding, and he was possibly dubious to his union with Hagar.

Hashem doesn’t merely reassert that through Yitzchok will Avrohom descend, but he reassures him that Yishmael is of great importance as well, that he too will become a great nation. Perhaps Hashem telling Avrohom that Yishmael Will become twelve tribes, was for the same purpose. Hashem was telling Avrohom that his understanding that Yishmael would be the Twelve Tribes that would comprise Klal-Yisroel was because Yishmael as well would be twelve tribes.

Avrohom Avinu isn’t arguing with Hashem, rather he is expressing his desire to understand Hashem. Due to Avrohom’s meticulous care to Hashem’s will he is concerned lest he erred.

We live with the Torah as a given, but that doesn’t mean that we need not understand it to the utmost. Understanding and being concerned that we are adhering to Gods will, must always concern us.

Good Shabbos, Rabbi Y.Dov Krakowski

Vertluch: Parshas Noach

Friday, October 4th, 2013

This weeks parsha begins with the well-known words of נֹחַ אִישׁ צַדִּיק תָּמִים הָיָה בְּדֹרֹתָיו, meaning Noach was righteous, and a tamim; he was faultless in his generation. Many ask that later on, when Hashem tells Noach כִּי אֹתְךָ רָאִיתִי צַדִּיק לְפָנַי בַּדּוֹר הַזֶּה, He leaves out the word tamim. It would seem that Noach was demoted a category from a tamim to just a regular tzaddik. What did he do to deserve this downgrading, so to speak?

Ksav Sofer offers a beautiful idea.

Rashi brings down that Noach was a trailblazer in the agriculture industry as he was the person who invented the plow. The ability for someone to plow a field was a concept introduced by Noach. Up until that point the procedure to plant was that a person went out into his field, physically planted the seeds and put their complete trust in Hashem. Whether it was through emunah sheleima, tefilla or both they clearly relied solely on the Ribono Shel Olam. They would daven fervently and pray for rain so that their seeds would sprout and produce. They understood quite clearly that Hashem and only Hashem can make their field produce vegetables, fruits and wheat.

However, this all changed, after Noach created the plow. People now began to think that everything they did was solely due from their efforts. They were capable of doing things and producing anything they had wanted and they slowly forgot who was in charge and who should be thanked. Instead of davening for rain they were convinced that once their seeds sprouted it was obviously because they had their hands in everything. This is what led them to slowly drift away and veered them towards committing more and more aveiros.

Noach himself was a tzaddik but the fact that he invented a vessel that caused others to forget Hashem it diminished his level of tzidkus, not allowing us to call him a tzaddik tamim. It caused them to lose focus and allowed them to stray to the point where they ultimately forgot that there was a Hashem who has his hand in everything. He therefore he lost his title of tamim.

Tosfos in Shabbos (31) brings a Yerushalmi which says that the word emunah refers to seder Zeraim. Because when someone plants something there is a tremendous level of emunah that they must have in order for what they had planted to grow and sprout forward. Remember what we had to do before these tools were created and readily available. The fact that Noach introduced the generation to that vessel- which led people to forget Hashem-was the reason that we can no longer consider him tamim, perfect, as something was now missing from his behavior.

What we have to realize is that we don’t live life for ourselves. We are responsible for what we do, how we act and what we create and develop. How we act, what we create, how we behave…everything will have an effect on our surroundings, on our family and on an entire generation.

Through understanding this may we all merit to witness the coming of Moshiach speedily in our days.

HAVE A GREAT SHABBOS

Hilchos Chol Hamoed

Wednesday, September 18th, 2013

rakThe following is meant as a convenient review of Halachos pertaining to Chol-Hamoed. The Piskei Din for the most part are based purely on the Sugyos, Shulchan Aruch and Ramah, and the Mishna Berura, unless stated otherwise. They are based on my understanding of the aforementioned texts through the teachings of my Rebeim. As individual circumstances are often important in determining the psak in specific cases, and as there may be different approaches to some of the issues, one should always check with one’s Rov first.

Rabbi Krakowski is the Rov Hamachshir for OU Kashrus in Eretz-Yisroel. He served as Rov of Kehilas Torah Vechssed. Rabbi Krakowski is a posek and Motz in Rechavia and Shaarei Chesed neighborhoods of Yerushalyim. Rabbi Krakowski learned in Beis Hamedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore, Shaar HaTorah Grodna in Queens, South Fallsburg, and Brisk.

Chol Hamoed has its own very specific Halachos. As in other instances, some Melachos are permissible to do on Chol Hamoed while others are forbidden. What is important to keep in mind is that even the Melachos that are permitted on Chol Hamoed are only permitted if they are done l’tzorech hamoed (for the sake of Chol Hamoed, i.e. in order to benefit from them on Chol Hamoed).

In general, the Melachos that are forbidden on Shabbos are forbidden on Chol-Hamoed except when they are being done for the sake of the Chag (Chol- Hamoed/Yom-Tov). There are, however, specific Melachos that Chazal ruled to be forbidden (Assur) even when they are Letzorech HaMoed.

  1. Melachos that are completely forbidden on Chol Hamoed:
    1. Shaving and haircuts (there are a few rare exceptions).
      1. We do not cut nails in a conventional manner. However to bite off, or peal, a nail is permitted.
        1. It is permitted to cut a particular nail (fingernail or toenail) if it is a source of discomfort.
    2. Laundering. There are, however, a few common exceptions:
      1. Bibs and cheesing cloths (used for infants), cloth diapers, may be laundered on Chol Hamoed. They may be laundered even before one needs them so long as we can reasonably assume that they will be used over the Chag (Chol Hamoed – Yom Tov).
        1. Likewise towels (especially hand towels and cleaning shmates) can be washed (i.e. not just those needed immediately) on Chol Hamoed.
      2. Other children’s clothing may be laundered, but only what is needed during Chol Hamoed or Yom Tov. It is forbidden to wash many children’s outfits at the same time if they are not all needed right away. Obviously, no laundering should be done if the child has enough clothing to make it through Yom-Tov.
        1. Tablecloths can likewise be washed on Chol Hamoed (but only what is needed at that time).
      3. A full ironing of a garment should not be done on Chol Hamoed, however one may spot iron a garment on Chol Hamoed.
    3. Gardening on Chol Hamoed is permitted only in the following limited circumstances:
      1. One can do anything with regard to edible plants if the work is done so as to be able to eat from these plants during the Chag.
        1. One shouldn’t plan on doing gardening on Chol Hamoed unless the freshness of the produce will make a marked difference to the quality and taste of the Yom-Tov foods.
        2. In the event any produce is left over from what was harvested during Chol Hamoed, this can be used even after Yom Tov.
          1. One may harvest as much as one wishes to on Chol Hamoed so long as what is harvested can in theory at least be consumed on the Chag.
      2. Regular gardening (not for eating, but rather for esthetic purposes) is only permitted if the plants would otherwise die.
    4. Fishing and trapping are only permitted if they are Letzorech Hamoed.
      1. One may fish and trap more than one is going to consume so long as the resulting catch could be eaten over Yom Tov.
      2. As fish and meat are generally better the fresher they are, it is permissible to plan on fishing or trapping on Chol-Hamoed.
      3. One is allowed to fish as a sport on Chol Hamoed .
      4. If one is fishing for commercial purposes, one should try to avoid doing so publically or in a way that makes it clear that the fishing is done commercially.
    5. One can undertake minor home improvements if those are for the immediate benefit of Chol Hamoed, and if the Melacha (work) involved does not require a professional. (A task that would normally require a professional can also be done if one can do it on one’s own without such an expert).
    6. Building or demolishing (a building, house…) is forbidden on Chol- Hamoed.
      1. It is forbidden to have a Goy (gentile) build or demolish something for you on Chol-Hamoed. This is true even if the work is to be done on a property outside of the regular populated areas and no one will know that the work is being done for a Jew.
        1. One cannot have something made on Chol Hamoed if it is not letzorech Hamoed, or if it can only be manufactured by a special craftsman (even if it is Letzorech Hamoed).
          1. If someone ordered something from a non-Jew before Yom-Tov and didn’t specify that it should be made over the Chag, it is ok for the Goy to manufacture the item during the Chag.  This is as long as it is done in the Goy’s property, and the materials being used still belong to the Goy.
      2. On Chol Hamoed Succos one may build a Succah. One is also allowed to pitch a tent or something similar on Chol Hamoed.
    7. We do not write on Chol Hamoed any documents or similar types of papers.
      1. One can write a letter to a friend on Chol-Hamoed, but the minhag is to do so with some change from the norm (either by writing the first line slanted, or by turning the paper sideways etc.)
        1. When writing a shopping list or other similar item Letzorech Hamoed (for Chol Hamoed/Yom Tov needs) it is preferable to do so with some sort of Shinui (change).
      2. One may write Divrei Torah so as not to forget them.
      3. One may type a letter or a list even though there isn’t really any way of making a Shinui.
    8. It is permissible to take pictures on Chol Hamoed.
      1. If one wishes to develop picture from a digital camera on Chol Hamoed one can. One should not, however, develop film on Chol Hamoed (Rav Yisroel Belsky Shlita).
    9. One should not move (furniture etc..) on Chol-Hamoed unless it is somehow Letzorech Hamoed. If one is afraid that an item may be damaged or stolen on Chol-Hamoed one can then move it, preferably without making it a very public act.
    10. Meleches Umon – professional work is forbidden on Chol-Hamoed. Therefore any job that a layman cannot perform without having special training is forbidden.
      1. One cannot have clothing tailored. One is allowed, however, to sew a button back on.
        1. If one’s hem becomes undone (or one needs to hem something for any other reason) one can do so in a non-professional manner (in a non-perfect manner).
      2. Car work requiring a professional mechanic should not be done on Chol-Hamoed. If, however, the work in question could also be performed by an untrained individual, but it is easier to have the mechanic do it, it then permissible to use a mechanic.
  2. Meleches Davar Ha’aved (loss of opportunity) is mutar (allowed). However, it is unclear if loss of possible gain is Mutar or not.
    1. One may go to work if otherwise one would lose one’s job. If, however, one will lose vacation days etc. one should then not work.
    2. If what is at stake is not loss of the job, but making less money that month, one should not go to work. If, however, the loss of salary will cause severe consequences one can then work.
    3. If one is in the middle of a lawsuit one can continue with the lawsuit over Chol Hamoed. If there isn’t any loss in putting off dealing with it until after the Chag, one should wait until after Yom-Tov.
      1. If one wishes to file a lawsuit on Chol Hamoed, one should preferably wait until after the Chag. If, however, one would lose out by waiting, one can go ahead and file even during Chol Hamoed.
    4. All the things that are allowed because of Davar Ha’aved on Chol Hamoed should be done by a Non-Jew whenever possible.
  3. One who sells things that are for the purpose of Yom-Tov may do so on Chol-Hamoed.
  4. Although many Chol-Hamoed activities involve various melachos these activities are nevertheless allowed since they are for the purpose of Simchas Yom-Tov – enjoying the Chag.
    1. This goes as far as being allowed to get/do a car wash on Chol Hamoed if we will enjoy driving a cleaner car.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

Hilchos Eruv Tavshilin

Wednesday, September 18th, 2013

rakThe following is meant as a convenient review of Halachos pertaining to Eiruv Tavshilin. The Piskei Din for the most part are based purely on the Sugyos, Shulchan Aruch and Ramah, and the Mishna Berura, unless stated otherwise. They are based on my understanding of the aforementioned texts through the teachings of my Rebeim. As individual circumstances are often important in determining the psak in specific cases, and as there may be different approaches to some of the issues, one should always check with one’s Rov first.

Rabbi Krakowski is the Rov Hamachshir for OU Kashrus in Eretz-Yisroel. He served as Rov of Kehilas Torah Vechssed. Rabbi Krakowski is a posek and Motz in Rechavia and Shaarei Chesed neighborhoods of Yerushalyim. Rabbi Krakowski learned in Beis Hamedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore, Shaar HaTorah Grodna in Queens, South Fallsburg, and Brisk.

Hilchos Eiruv Tavshilin:

On Yom Tov one is only permitted to cook for that day of Yom-Tov alone. When Yom-Tov is on Erev Shabbos this presents an issue as it becomes difficult to properly prepare for Shabbos.  In order to allow us to prepare (cook, light fires etc.) for Shabbos Chazal created an “Eiruv”.  This Eiruv is referred to as “Eiruv Tavshilin”. The following sheet will discuss the Halachos of who makes an Eiruv Tavshilin, how it’s made, when it’s made, and what to do if it isn’t made.

 

  1. An Eiruv Tavshilin must be made by every household in order to prepare for Shabbos when an Erev Shabbos is Yom-Tov.
    1. Even if one doesn’t intend to prepare food for Shabbos or even to light candles for Shabbos, an Eiruv Tavshilin should still be made.
    2. Someone who is a guest in someone else’s house for the entire Yom-Tov does not need to make his own Eiruv Tavshilin.
    3. Bachurim living in Diros in Israel, and likewise single girls living alone, are obligated to make an Eiruv Tavshilin.
  1.                                                                i.      Basically anyone who is obligated to light their own Shabbos candles must make their own Eiruv Tavshilin (one can only light one candle if one didn’t make an Eiruv Tavshilin).
  2.                                                                i.      It seems that the Poskim were in favor of people making such an Eiruv Tavshilin.
  3.                                                              ii.      The Halachos of how to make such an Eiruv Tavshilin are similar to those of Eiruv Chatzairos and should only be done by someone who knows how to do so. If one feels he should be making such an Eiruv but is unfamiliar with the Halachos that person should consult a competent Halachic authority.
  4.                                                             iii.      One shouldn’t Lechatchila  rely on the “Gadol Hair’s” Eiruv; before relying on it one should consult the Gadol Hair.
  5.                                                                i.      Bedi-eved any cooked food could be used even if it was already somewhat disregarded (i.e. left overs stuck to the sides of the pot…) as long as there is a Kezayis/Kebeitza.
  6.                                                              ii.      There is a minhag and inyan to use these items for Shalosh Seudas.
  7.                                                                i.      If one cooked item disappeared before Shabbos then one can only light one Shabbos candle, or alternatively share in someone else’s Shabbos candles.
  8.                                                              ii.      If someone made an Eiruv Tavshilin and it inadvertently disappeared before Shabbos then even if that person ends up using the “Gadol Ha’ir’s” Eiruv Tavshilin, that person still can use his Eiruv Tavshilin another time bedi-eved.
  9.                                                             iii.      Lechatchila one also cannot consume the baked item before Shabbos.
  10.                                                                i.      If one, however, did make such an Eiruv and the Gadol Ha’ir let that person use his Eiruv, the next time that person again forgets to make an appropriate Eiruv he can still use the Gadol Ha’ir’s Eiruv Bedi-eved.
  11.                                                                i.      In Israel one should not make an Eiruv Tavshilin more than twelve minutes after sunset without asking a Rov. In America one should not make an Eiruv Tavshilin more than 20 minutes after Shkia without asking a Rov first.
  12.                                                                i.      If this is particularly difficult, bedi-eved the wife may do the cooking and light Shabbos candles. In such a case it may be wise to discuss with a Rov if the wife can or can’t prepare for Shabbos.
  13.                                                                i.      If one can one should ask someone to make an Eiruv Tavshilin for him.
    1. In order to do so, the one making the Eiruv for another should do it with the intent that it be for the one(s) needing the food preparation. This can be accomplished by the person making the Eiruv giving the other person the food he is using for an Eiruv as a present.
    1. The Gadol Ha’ir (nowadays typically community Rabbonim) is Zoche for anyone who didn’t make their own Eiruv Tavshilin.
  1. An Eiruv Tavshilin is accomplished by taking 2 already prepared food items. One of these items should be a cooked food (traditionally boiled eggs, but it could be any other type of cooked food that would normally be consumed together with bread –  fish meat beans etc.), and the other item should be a baked item (traditionally a roll or Matza, but it could consist of cake as well).
    1. There is a hidur to use complete items such as a whole Matza and a whole egg.
    1. Each item should be a Kebeitza (a halachic egg size measurement); bedi-eved if it is a Kezayis (halachic olive size measurement) it is still ok.
    2. If the cooked item of the Eiruv was consumed before one started to prepare foods for Shabbos, one cannot then even start to prepare these foods. If it disappeared after one started to prepare, then whatever one started to prepare is permissible but whatever one didn’t yet prepare one cannot prepare.
    1. If one only used a tavshil (cooked food), the Eiruv still works both for cooking and for baking.
    2. If one only used a baked item the Eiruv doesn’t work even for baking alone.
  1. The Eiruv Tavshilin should be made before candle lighting.
    1. Bedi-eved (and when there isn’t any other option) if it was not made one can still make it as long as it is before complete nightfall.
    1. If one didn’t light candles (as one can light candles on Yom-Tov anyway) and it is after Shkia, one can and should still bedi-eved make an Eiruv Tavshilin.
    2. If someone’s wife lit candles but the husband didn’t yet accept Yom-Tov, then he can still make an Eiruv Tavshilin.  It is, however, better that his wife doesn’t do the preparations for Yom-Tov, but rather he or some other male members of the household should. This includes lighting Shabbos candles as well.
    1. If there isn’t any way for one to both daven Mincha and make an Eiruv Tavshilin, one should then rather daven Mincha and not make the Eiruv Tavshilin.
  1. One may not cook on the first day of Yom-Tov (on a 2 day Chutz-LaAretz Yom-Tov) for Shabbos which comes out on the day after the first day of Yom-Tov
  2. When there is a two day Yom-Tov followed by Shabbos the Eiruv Tavshilin should be made on before candle lighting of the first day.
    1. On all other Yomim Tovim other than Rosh Hashanah (i.e. all two day Chutz LaAretz Yomim-Tovim that are followed by Shabbos) Bedi-eved if one didn’t make an Eiruv Tavshilin before the first day, one can do so before the second day in the following conditional manner: “If today (the first day) was Yom Tov than I can cook tomorrow for Shabbos anyway, but if tomorrow is Yom-Tov then I am making now my Eiruv Tavshilin for Shabbos”.

 

If one did not make an Eiruv Tavshilin and didn’t have the Gadol Ha’ir’s Eiruv to use:

 

  • Someone else (who did make an Eiruv) can still cook for him
  • This indivicual who did not make an Eiruv cannot cook for anyone else for Shabbos even if the other person made an Eiruv.
  • This individual can cook extra on Yom-Tov while he is cooking for Yom-Tov  if it can theoretically be eaten on Yom-Tov.

 

One can only rely on the Gadol Ha’ir’s Eiruv one time. The Gadol Hair’s Eiruv cannot be relied upon regularly or even more than once unless otherwise stated or otherwise advised by a competent Halachic authority.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

Vertluch: Sukkos 5774

Wednesday, September 18th, 2013

The mishna is Succah (28b) says that if it rains on Succos it is comparable to a slave that comes to pour a cup of wine for his master and he poured a pitcher of water on his face.’

The gemara (29a) explains that when the mishna says ’ he poured a pitcher of water on his face’…it means that the master spilled a pitcher [of water] on [the slaves] face as to say ‘I do not desire your service!’.

Vilna Gaon says that the water the slave had in his hand represented middas harachamim, hence it was white -clear. The wine that the mishna was referring to represented Hashems middas hadin, which was red. The question is, if the master, which is Hashem, does not desire our services now then apparently he has not let go of His middas Hadin. Why then would He so to speak be pouring water over us which represented middas harachamim. He should be pouring wine over us because He is still representing His middas Hadin?

One can answer is that even though Hashem may be showing us that he is unhappy with us he is still the ultimate compassionate and Merciful One. He was showing us that even through his anger He will not unleash His wrath at us, his beloved children, and he will shower us with water, which represented His middas harachamim.

How beautiful is this pshat is and how fortunate we are to be considered His children. Even in His wrath he is still showing us rachamim. Perhaps-and unfortunately- this year there will be din, but Hashem will still show us rachamim. Knowing this is how we are getting treated how can one God forbid sin?

It is up to us to realize the beauty of yiddishkeit and perhaps to try to focus on that aspect this coming year.

WISHING YOU A CHAG KOSHER V’SAMEACH

Vertluch: Yom Kippur 5774

Friday, September 13th, 2013

Rambam in hilchos teshuva, (perek aleph) asks how one says viduy (where one accepts and confesses they have sinned). He answers, we say ‘Ana chatasi, avisi, pashati…’ loosely translated to mean ‘I was wrong and I will never do it again.’ Ramban holds that teshuva is divided into three parts. First is to recognize you have sinned; second is to regret the sin; and last is to accept never to commit it again.

Rambam (perek bais) then repeats and asks what is the procedure? He answers that we should decide never to repeat that same sin and then regret our past actions of doing it previously. He adds ‘the one who understands your thoughts should give you strength and be your witness to never do it again.’ Rambam takes the commitment not to sin again and places it before and after the regret. The obvious question is why Rambam repeated twice the commitment of never doing it again?

Furthermore, what is meant by ‘the God who knows your thoughts should be your witness never to do it again’? Hashem never interferes with our thoughts and/or emotions. Kesef Mishna says it means that you should call upon Hashem to be your witness; it’s incumbent on the person to ask Hashem to be their witness. The question is what does it mean to ‘call Hashem your witness’ and why is it necessary to do so?

At the onset of Yom Kippur we chant Kol Nidrei. In Kol Nidrei we say that any future vows I will verbalize throughout the upcoming year I am regretting now; even though I attempt to do them in the foreseeable future I regret them in advance. Is this is our introduction to Yom Kippur? Before Rosh Hashana we nullify our vows through hataras nedarim and by doing so we eliminate our past vows. Yet now, we are cancelling our future vows. What seems to be an explanation here? Additionally, the pasuk of ‘V’nislach l’chal adas bnei Yisroel…’is the Yom Kippur version of kiddush. The question here is what does the cancellation of our future vows have to do with the kiddush of Yom Kippur and Kol Nidrei?

The answer is as follows:

We have a concept called teshuva. Chazal say that repentance was creating before the creation of the world and comes from one midda of Hashem-a great mercy- called Vinakeh; Hashem cleanses. This is how Moshe evoked the thirteen attributes as well. When the prophet Micha saw the thirteen attributes he described them as the ‘ancient of days’. The reason is that it was created before the world was and it’s older than the world. But why did teshuva have to be created beforehand?

Each individual has their own master plan. It’s easy for one to make a wrong turn and as you veer off the path, you fall off the cliff. You sinned; now you must die. What Hashem did was create something that will allow you to redirect yourself and veer back on track. Each of us has a mission in life and Hashem wants to ensure that when we make the wrong turn we would be able to automatically get rerouted. He therefore created a self correcting mechanism called teshuva which gets us right back on track. People mistakenly think that when they make a wrong turn it’s on their record forever. Teshuva allows us to take that wrong turn and turn it into the right path.

Reb Tzadok Hacohen says that the difference between a tzadik and a rasha is that a rasha gets held up on regret. A tzadik takes that regret and turns it into a kabala because without a commitment there is no regret. Regret leads us to commitment and teshuva allows us to take our mistakes and use it as encouragement to avoid doing so again, in the future. If you regret, it will lead to kabala.

So why do we call Hashem to be our witness? Because if you take the regret as a regret alone, it means nothing. You need to take it and make it into something so we ask Hashem to be a witness so we don’t make the same mistake twice. We want to use our regrets as a stepping stone to allow us not do the same exact thing again in the upcoming year. And this is what Kol Nidrei is all about.

Chazal tell us that the word ‘Ha-satan’ equals the numerical value of 364; and the solar year is 365 days-one day off. Which day is missing? Yom Kippur-because the satan doesn’t function on Yom Kippur. The word satan equals the numerical value of 359. But how does it become 364? By adding the letter Hay. (Equal numerically to five) But just add the Vuv to make it 365? Moreover, what does it mean that there is no satan on Yom Kippur. We know the satan plays a big role throughout these days as we know we blow and then stop blowing the shofar in order to confuse the satan. The question is how?

Chazal tell us that we have one entity with three names: 1.Satan 2. Malach hamaves 3. Yetzer hara. We know that the yetzer hara and malach hamaves are working fervently on Yom Kippur; only the satan isn’t. The question is how come?

We know that the yetzer haras job is to make us take the wrong turn. When we do something wrong we’re in trouble. The malach hamaves comes along and says that’s it and now you must fall off the cliff. The satan comes and tries to bridge the two together as the prosecutor but on Yom Kippur he cannot do this. The reason is because Hashem has the master plan and He can reroute us automatically. On Yom Kippur the Hay is missing; ‘The’ prosecutor, that satan, is not there.

The following true story brings home this message.

There was once a young man who was an apprentice to an electrician. As the electrician got older he decided it was time to sell the company and retire. This young man decided to pursue the opportunity and purchase the company from his employer. After approaching bank after bank all he was able to get were rejection letters; he approached in all twenty seven banks and received twenty seven rejection letters. The twenty eight bank granted him credit and thus he bought the company. He expanded that company immensely and ultimately profited over $1 Billion from it. Today, he lives and works on a boat. The first thing you see when you enter his office is twenty seven rejection letters hanging on the wall. Upon wondering about these letters he will tell you ‘imagine if I gave up after the third bank.’ He used his mistakes as a stepping stone for his success. With each rejection letter came a different reason so going forward every application had more and more corrections until he finally got to that twenty eighth bank.

This is the concept of teshuva. Hashem has a master plan and he wants it to be real. Yes you can skin a cat in many ways and Hashem wants us each to succeed. He wants us to make mistakes and the ultimate proof to that is that we’re humans. But He wants us to take those mistakes and turn them into success. We have teshuva so we can take our regrets and lead them into kabalos to become one path of mimei kedem. This is why we cancel our past nedarim as we’re taking our regrets of past nedarim to prevent our future vows from happening.

The word regret in Hebrew is nechama which also means consolation. What is the common denominator between the two? Both are a change of perspective. The word regret has to turn into consolation and to do that is by commitment. When your regrets lead to success that is the greatest consolation.

Even though we know we will fail, we should fail for different reasons. To make mistakes is human; making the same mistake twice though is unacceptable.

The message here is clear. By taking our failures and using those as stepping stones to succeed will prove to Hashem that we truly regretted our past actions which will hopefully speed up the coming of Moshiach bimheira v’yameinu amen.

WISHING YOU A GMAR CHASIMA TOVA & A GUT G’BENTCHED YUR

Hilchos Umihagei Yom Kippur 5774

Thursday, September 12th, 2013

kraThe following is meant as a convenient review of Halachos pertaining to Rosh Yom-Kippur. The Piskei Din for the most part are based purely on the Sugyos, Shulchan Aruch and Ramah, and the Mishna Berura, unless stated otherwise. They are based on my understanding of the aforementioned texts through the teachings of my Rebeim. As individual circumstances are often important in determining the psak in specific cases, and as there may be different approaches to some of the issues, one should always check with one’s Rov first.

Rabbi Krakowski is the Rov Hamachshir for OU Kashrus in Eretz-Yisroel. He served as Rov of Kehilas Torah Vechssed. Rabbi Krakowski is a posek and Motz in Rechavia and Shaarei Chesed neighborhoods of Yerushalyim. Rabbi Krakowski learned in Beis Hamedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore, Shaar HaTorah Grodna in Queens, South Fallsburg, and Brisk.

Hilchos Uminhagei Yom Kippur:

 

  1. There is a prevalent Minhag to do Kaparos on Erev Yom Kippur.  Kaparos are traditionally done with live chickens. There are those who are Noheg to do Kaparos with money instead of live chickens.
    1. The idea behind Kaparos is that the chickens/money is meant as a symbolic atonement (kaparah) for the person – should one be deserving of the death penalty (even Misa Beyedei Shamayim)  the chicken (which is then shechted and given to Tzedaka), or the money, symbolically takes the place of the transgressor.
    2. Men and boys use roosters while women and girls use Hens. Expecting women take two – a rooster and a hen (even if they know that they are having a girl)
    3. One must be careful, when doing Kaparos with chickens not to do it in a way that will cause excessive pain to the chicken, and one should try not to cause the chicken to become a treifa.
    4. Most Jews of Hungarian or Polish descent do Kaparos on chickens, while Jews of German and Lithuanian origin either do it on money or not at all. Sephardim have varying Minhagim.

i.      The Shulchan Aruch writes against doing Kaparos, and the Gra also is opposed to Kaparos.  The Rama however strongly defends Kaparos, and explains that it is an ancient custom dating back to the Gaonim (others say even before the time of the Geonim).

  1. If one is not Noheg to do Kaparos then perhaps he shouldn’t start. Those who, however, are accustomed to do Kaparos certainly should not stop.
  2. While doing the Kaparos there are various tefilos and psukim one should say, these are printed in most siddurim and machzorim.
  3. On Erev Yom-Kippur one should go to the Mikvah.
    1. All adult men should dip in the mikva.

i.      As this is mostly for reasons of purity there is little reason for boys who have not physically matured yet to go to the Mikva.

ii.      There are those that maintain that the purpose for going to the mikva isn’t only for purity reasons, but rather something one should do before doing Teshuva. According to this opinion, it then stands to reason that boys over nine should go to the mikva.

  1. There is an issur for a son to see his father undressed. This issur is for tznius reasons and not for Kibud Av reasons – thus a father cannot be mochel and allow his son to see him undressed.
  2. The aforementioned issur extends to brothers-in-law, fathers-in- law, and grandfathers.
    1. Since children who aren’t of age to understand the Teshuva process have no reason to go to the Mikvah, and since there also an additional prohibition for them to see their fathers undressed, young boys should not be brought to the mikva.

iii.      When getting undressed before immersing in the mikve one should remove their underpants last unless they are wearing an undershirt (the bottom layer shirt) that covers their mila (see Meseches Derech Eretz Rabba and Zuta)

  1. There are those that maintain that women, and girls who already understand Teshuva (9+), should go to the mikva as well.

i.      In most Ashkenazi communities this is not commonly done, and one should therefore not start to do so on one’s own.

ii.      In some Chasidishe communities there are many that are Noheg that married women go to the Mikva.

  1. The old minhag in Yerushalayim is for women and girls over nine to go to the mikva Erev Yom-Kippur.

iii.      Amongst the Sephardim there are those that are noheg that women and girls (9+) go to the mikva.

  1. The prevalent Minhag is to go after Chatzos, but before the Seuda Hamafsekes.

i.      One shouldn’t go before Chatzos, unless there is no other option.

ii.      It is ok to go after the Seuda Hamafsekes.

  1. Aveilim even during Shiva go to the Mikva Erev Yom-Kippur.
  2. There is a Mitzvah to eat Erev Yom-Kippur.
    1. The Mitzvah exists during the entire day.
    2. One may not fast on Erev-Yom-Kippur.
    3. One must eat at least the seudas Hamafsekes.

i.      There is a largely accepted minhag to eat two seudos Erev Yom-Kippur: one in the morning and one in the afternoon.

ii.      One should eat meat for the Seudas Hamafsekes.

  1. There are those that eat Dairy for the morning meal, but many are noheg to eat meat for both.
  2. If one ate the Seuda Hamafsekes and then wishes to eat or drink more after the Seuda, that person should make a stipulation to that effect before or while he is still eating the Seuda Hamafsekes.

i.      If one didn’t make a verbal stipulation, but did intend to eat after the Seuda Hamafsekes, there is no problem and one can continue eating.

ii.      If one didn’t stipulate or intend to eat (i.e. didn’t give any thought as to whether or not one wished to eat again) it is advisable not to eat.  If, however, there is a significant reason for eating more, one can do so.

iii.       If one thought that he was not going to eat more, then even if one didn’t verbally say so, one should refrain from eating. If there is a need to eat, one can do so.

iv.      If one actually said that he was not going to eat again then one may not eat again until after the fast.

  1. Although it is a Mitzva to eat Erev Yom Kippur, we must stop eating some time before the fast begins, as we are obligated to add onto the Kedushas Hayom.
  2. Mincha Erev Yom Kippur:
    1. Mincha occurs prior to the Seuda Hamafsekes.
    2. It is preferable that one daven Mincha in Yom-Tov garb.
    3. It is brought down in the Shulchan Aruch that one should get tapped lightly (symbolic ‘‘lashes’’) 39 times with a belt after Mincha.

i.      Many people do not do put this into practice.

ii.      These ‘‘lashes’’ don’t have a din of Makos (halachic ‘lashes’).

iii.      While one is receiving these ‘lashes’ one should say viduy.

iv.      The person giving the ‘lashes’ should say Vehu Rachum etc. three times.

v.      The person giving the ‘lashes’ should be extra careful not to hurt the person receiving the ‘lashes’.

vi.      Prior to receiving ‘lashes’ Mechila should be given for the humiliation involved in receiving the ‘lashes’. As these ‘lashes’ should be a far cry from anything that would hurt the one receiving them, there is no need to be mochel one for one’s potentially getting hurt.

  1. Seuda Hamafsekes is eaten after Mincha, and should be a lavish Yom-Tov style meal.
    1. One should refrain from eating nuts at this Seuda (particularly almonds)
    2. We don’t eat foods with garlic, nor do we eat dairy products.
    3. There are those that have a minhag to eat stuffed cabbage and/or Creplach.

i.      If one has these Minhagim it is good to keep to them, but they are not of importance and there is no reason to start.

  1. All foods eaten during the Seuda should be foods that are easy on the stomach and digestive system.
  2. We are noheg to light a yartzeit-size candle for all married adult man.
    1. A yartzeit-size candle should be placed in the bedroom when a husband and wife will be sleeping in the same room.

i.      In reality an electric night-light would suffice, but since the minhag is a yartzeit candle it is best not to veer from the minhag.

  1. If there is danger in using a candle then a night-light may be used.
  2. We are also noheg that a yartzeit candle should be lit for each deceased parent.

i.      The yartzeit candle for a deceased parent shouldn’t be used for Havdala nor should another candle be lit from it.

  1. We light candles as on Shabbos and we recite the bracha of lehadlik ner shel yom-hakipurim, and Shehechiyanu.
    1. On years that Yom-Kippur falls out on Shabbos as does this year’s – we say shel Shabbos veyom hakipurim.
    2. A woman who lights candles and then goes to shul should not make Shehechiyanu together with everyone else as she already did so when lighting.
    3. We are noheg to cover the table as on Shabbos – with Shabbos table-cloths.

Yom Kippur:

On Yom Kippur it is forbidden to eat and drink, to wash, to anoint, to wear leather shoes, and to be intimate. In this section we will discuss the particulars of the aforementioned.

 

  1. It is forbidden to eat or drink even the smallest amount; however, while eating a very small amount is only a prohibition, to eat more than a shiur (minimum halachic amount) is a Chiyuv Karress. Therefore, under extenuating circumstances we are more lenient to allow eating and drinking in small amounts (less than the halachic minimum amount) at halachically stipulated intervals.
    1. Someone who might need to eat or drink on Yom-Kippur should discuss these exact measured amounts (Shiurim) and time intervals with a competent Rov.
    2. If one wasn’t planning on doing Shiurim, or wasn’t able to ask a Rov then one should try to wait nine minutes between each eating, or between each drinking.

i.      Each drinking should be about a small shot glass (like the disposable kind).

ii.      Each eating should be a similar volume.

  1. Each time a person eats is still an issur therefore one shouldn’t use more Shiurim than nescesary.

i.      Any type of food may be eaten or drunk when one is doing Shiurim; however, as the number of times one eats or drinks in this manner should be minimized, it’s best that the substance being drunk be hydrating, and the food satiating.

  1. Different types of foods can be combined to form a shiur, and so too are different types of drinks. Drinks and food, however, cannot be combined to form a shiur together.
  2. One doing Shiurim (or who ate/drank less than a shiur) shouldn’t be a shliach tzibur in any capacity. This includes getting an Aliya.

i.      If one received an Aliya, the Aliya counts and it is OK to accept it.

  1. It is forbidden to wash oneself whatsoever. This includes washing any part of one’s body – whether in cold or hot water. Since the main prohibition is washing in a way that provides a certain pleasure, exceptions to the rule are made during Yom Kippur in the following situations in which washing is allowed:
    1. Netilas Yadayim in the morning – until the knuckles.
    2. To wash one’s hands after touching a body part generally covered, scratching one’s scalp, or touching one’s shoe etc. One should also wash hands after using the bathroom even if one’s hands remained clean.
    3. If any body part became dirty. If one requires soap to wash off the dirt one may use a watered down liquid soap to do so.
    4. Even if a women’s Lel-Tevila comes out on Yom Kippur she may not be Tovel until after Yom-Kippur.
    5. One cannot anoint oneself whenever this is done so for the sake of pleasure. This includes cosmetic or minor topical health issues. One can apply ointment to an infection.
      1. One can apply whatever ointments might be necessary to heal a skin infection.
      2. Although some maintain that it is permissible to put on aerosol deodorants on Yom-Kippur, one should avoid doing so by applying a good deodorant Erev-Yom-Kippur.

i.      One cannot apply perfume or cologne on Yom-Kippur, even according to Poskim who may allow it on Shabbos. Likewise no form of makeup may be applied on Yom-Kippur.

  1. According to the Shulchan Aruch and the traditional Poskim all non-leather shoes may be worn no matter the comfort or style of the shoe; this includes non-leather sneakers and crocks.
    1. Originally some Poskim were opposed to synthetic leather shoes for reasons of Maras Ayin. Since nowadays people are used to the fact that there are many shoes made of synthetic leathers, it seems that it is permissible to wear such shoes.
    2. There is a machlokes Harishonim regarding real shoes fabricated from non-leather substances (see Rosh and Rambam). Some of the Rishonim maintain that all shoes that are commonly worn outdoors are considered shoes regarding the prohibition of shoe wearing on Yom-Kippur. According to these opinions the only footwear permitted would be flip-flop-like sandals or flimsy house slippers etc. This is not the view of the Shulchan Aruch nor is it the common Mesorah.

i.      There are many Chasidim and Anshei Maaseh who refrain from wearing any footwear.

  1. Some people only wear more substantial footwear outside, but inside refrain from almost all footwear.
  2. If one only has leather shoes and needs to walk somewhere that would require him to wear such shoes, he may do so on his way there but must remove them immediately upon arrival at his destination.
  3. Young children that are old enough to realize that Yom-Kippur is a unique day should not wear leather shoes. This age may vary depending on the child (somewhere between age 3 and 5).
  4. The prohibition of intimacy on Yom-Kippur extends even to touching one’s wife or sleeping in the same bed.
    1. This includes other Harchakos as well.

Who must fast?

As Yom-Kippur is the only Biblical fast, and as not fasting on Yom-Kippur renders one guilty of Karress, there are far fewer leniencies as to who doesn’t need to fast, and as to when a fast may be broken.

  1. All adults above Bar-Bas Mitzva are obligated to fast; this includes nursing and expecting mothers.
    1. Women within three days from birth don’t need to fast. From three days after until seven days after birth it is the new mother who is central in determining: if she feels she needs to eat she can eat; if she feels she can fast she then should.
    2. Obviously anybody for whom not eating on Yom Kippur is life-threatening should not fast. However if one can get away with Shiurim then one should not eat in any other fashion.
    3. Anyone who would be dangerously affected by not eating should discuss the predicament with a physician and a Rov.
    4. Minors over age nine should not eat on Yom-Kippur night, and should put off their first eating to an hour or two later than their usual first meal.
      1. They should not delay eating by more than an hour or two.
      2. Minors over the age of eleven, whether boy or girl, are rabbinicaly obligated to fast the whole day.
      3. Children below age nine should not fast at all.

As fasting on Yom-Kippur is the most integral part of the day, and the most important element in achieving atonement, it is important to make one’s ability to fast the main focus. Therefore Nursing and expecting mothers, and likewise all sick or weak people should stay in bed as much as they can – even at the expense of Tefilla Betzibur, or even davening altogether.

Other Minhagim of Yom-Kippur:

  1. There is a minhag to stay up all night Yom Kippur.
    1. As for most people this would make the fast considerably harder, it is not advisable to do so.
    2. There is a Minhag to finish the entire Sefer Tehilim on Yom-Kippur.
    3. There are those who are careful even if they sleep at night, not go to sleep during the entire day.
      1. This is more important than not sleeping at night. Therefore if by not sleeping at night someone will need to take a nap during the day, it is then far better to sleep at night and to stay awake all day.
      2. There is a minhag to stand the whole day.
        1. There is yet a slightly more prevalent minhag to stand throughout the entire davening.

Motzai Yom-Kippur:

  1. On Motzai Yom-Kippur we make Havdala on a cup of wine (or grape juice, beer etc.), and we make a bracha of Aish. We do not use Besamim.
    1. When Yom Kipur falls out on Shabbos there are those who do use besamim.

i.      One should not change their Minhag either way. If one’s Minhag is to use Besamim they should continue to do so. And if one’s minhag is not to use besamim they should not start to use besamim.

  1. The fire should be from a flame that existed before Yom Kippur or that was lit from a candle that was lit before Yom-Kippur.

i.      If one doesn’t have such a flame some of the Gedolei Acharonim (Reb Chaim Ozer, and Avodas Hamelech) say one can make it on an electric light – on an incandescent light bulb (that was lit from before Yom-Kippur – it is debatable whether one can use light from a light bulb that was lit after).

  1. It is questionable whether one can use fluorescent light bulbs.
  2. On Motzai Yom Kippur we do not extinguish any candles lit before Yom-Kippur.
    1. It is ok to turn off all types of electric lights.
    2. If a Yar Tzeit candle blew out during Yom-Kipur one should rekindle it after Yom-Kipur and allow it to burn out.
    3. Right after Yom Kippur we are noheg to do something towards building the Succah.
      1. Since the purpose of this is to go straight from Yom-Kippur to busying ourselves with Mitzvos, some people busy themselves with Arba Minim.
      2. Many are noheg to make a Seuda on Motzai Yom-Kippur.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

B’Ohel Haneviyim: Shabbos Yom Kippur 5774

Thursday, September 12th, 2013

On Yom Kippur we read the Torah twice. Both Krios have a Haftorah. The Haftorah for the second Kriah (at Mincha) is Yona. Yona is one of the “trei Asar” (twelve Neviyim that were grouped into one book). The story of Yona is well known: there was a city called Nineveh. This city was sinful to the point that Hashem decided to destroy them. Before doing so, however, Hashem decided to give them one last chance and, to convey the message, sent the Jewish Prophet Yona. The latter’s mission was to warn the people of Nineveh that if they did not repent within forty days, Hashem would destroy the entire city. Yona did not want to do as commanded by Hashem, fearing the negative consequences for Am-Yisroel should Nineveh repent: if goyim can repent then of course Am-Yisroel should repent. This would make a stronger case against Klal-Yisroel’s not being Chozer beteshuva. To escape having to carry out Hashem’s mandate, Yona ran but in the end, after a long miraculous journey, was compelled to do Hashem’s Will. He went to Nineveh and conveyed Hashem’s message. The city heeded Yona’s warning and repented.

While it seems obvious that this Haftorah is chosen for Yom-Kipur afternoon because of the powerful Teshuva message it still leaves us with some questions.
The Neviyim are full of rebuke to Am-Yisroel; there are many nevuos that discuss Am-Yisroel’s eventual Teshuva. There are even stories of Am-Yisroel repenting in Navi (like the stories of Chizkiyahu Hamelech). Why do we choose a Nevua that talks about Goyim doing Teshuva when we could have used a Nevua talking about Jews doing Teshuva? Furthermore the fact that goyim did do Teshuva is somewhat incriminating for Klal-Yisroel – why haven’t we done Teshuva?

The Mishna in Pirkei Avos tells us that Man is dear to Hashem because he was created in the image of Hashem. Rav Yaakov Kaminetzky said regarding this Mishnah “halevai that we would treat our fellow Jews the way the Torah treats all mankind, even a goy”!

My father in-law always says that when one is arguing a point it’s best not to use all the arguments one has. The more arguments one makes the more potential counter-arguments are created. One should instead take the best argument available, one that is virtually non-negotiable and make a case from that one basic but strong foundation.

It is Yom-Kipur and we need to do Teshuva. While there are so many different Nevuos that can be chosen to inspire us to Teshuva there is something unique about Yona. Yona is a testimony to the fact that anyone can do Teshuva. Yona is a testimony of a city full of gentile sinners who repented. It appeals to all of us to repent – not to repent because we are special, but to repent because we are human beings. Yona is the strongest argument we can use to make the case that we must do Teshuva.

The Mishna in Pirkei Avos continues that Am-Yisroel is even more special because we are Hashem’s children. Yona is the strongest argument that we must do Teshuva: if goyim can do it, we can certainly do so.

Let’s return to Hashem as human beings and the next step will be natural: we will return to Hashem as His children.

A very warm Good Shabbos, Rabbi Y. Dov Krakowski

Vertluch: Rosh Hashana 5774

Wednesday, September 4th, 2013

The date of July 21st, 1969 is one that is in all the history books. It was the day that the astronaut Neil Armstrong took his first steps on the moon. Everyone, wherever they were, stopped what they were doing to watch this historic event on television. Harav Yaakov Kaminestzky, Zt’l also went to a gentile neighbor to catch a glimpse of this spectacle; Reb Yaakov felt it important to see it with his own eyes as the expression goes: seeing is believing.

However, how many of us actually made the effort to see it for ourselves? Once we were told of it we believed it and had no doubt that it actually happened. This shows us that we have no problem believing anything. We can even believe events as crazy as a man walking on the moon.

Why is it then that people have such a hard time believing things that are written in the Torah? People have a hard time believing that Hashem judges our entire upcoming year on Rosh Hashana. Why is that so hard to fathom?

The answer is simple. Whether or not Neil Armstrong walked on the moon doesn’t change anything that we need to do. We have a harder time changing our ways than believing even the most extraordinary things. The moment that belief makes us change is when we turn off.

But change is what this time period is all about.

When discussing what types of leathers are susceptible to becoming tamei the mishna says (Kelim 17; 13) ‘all leather from a sea creature is tahor’. For example, if you make a wallet from leather of a dolphin it is tahor. There is one exception though known as the ‘kelev hayam’. Rav explains the reason that this sea creature is susceptible to tumah is because it is the only animal that lives, swims and breaths in the water until it feels threatened. Once they get that feeling they emerge onto dry land for survival. Says the Rav if its only hope for survival is on dry land then that’s what it is associated with. Its entire life it can be underwater and only for an hour can it be on dry land, but it is still considered a land animal.

A person throughout the year could be doing things they’re not supposed to be doing. That is until the pressure mounts and at that moment they change. They daven, learn, give tzedaka, say tehillim, etc. Regardless of how we act a whole year, when we’re in trouble we act a different way, we change for the better! That determines who we truly are. When things get rough and difficult, we respond positively.

Gemara in Berachos tells us that when R’ Gamliel was Rosh Hayeshiva he had a guard who wouldn’t let those who were not tocho k’baro into the Bais Medrash. The question is how did he know who was and who wasn’t?

The answer is that he had a guard standing at the door not allowing anyone to enter. The ones that said okay, we can’t get in today, were not tocho k’baro. However, the ones that didn’t let that deter them and found another way to get inside the Bais Medrash to learn, he was able to determine they were indeed tocho k’baro.

Rosh Hashana is about change and change is hard. But the awareness that these days are upon us causes us to feel a sense of urgency about what is to transpire and how our entire year is being determined. Our change for the better defines the essence of who we are.

Gemara in Chagiga says there are three people who cause Hashem to cry. One of them is a person who is able to learn Torah and doesn’t. Such as one who comes to shul two or three minutes early for maariv and instead of going inside to hear some words of Torah stays outside to talk. Why does it cause Hashem to cry?

The point is driven home in the following story:

We have all heard of the terrible and earth shattering story of what happened to Leiby Kletzky, hy’d. A young boy missing for two long days who had the entire state searching for his whereabouts. Mr. Kletzky was sitting in a room with detectives and some shomrim members about to look over some surveillance footage to see if they can find out where he may be. The room was extremely tense and quiet as the detective began to play the video. Suddenly they saw the image of a little boy walking and they watched him make a turn where he shouldn’t have. As soon as Mr. Kletzky saw that, he started screaming “Leiby, NO! DON’T GO! DON’T GO!’ When he saw his child making the wrong turn he knew it was a recipe for disaster.

Says the Chofetz Chaim, why does Hashem cry? Because he knows what happens when someone doesn’t learn! He sees people living it up with the attitude of ‘life’s a party’. But do we know what is at the end of the road? Do we know what happens to them all the way at the end? We aren’t privy to that information but Hashem knows and that’s why he cries. When he sees his child not learning or following a path of Torah he knows what awaits them at the end of his course. It’s not about what’s in front of us. We aren’t privileged to see the end and therefore can’t adequately judge what we see right now because there is so much more that lies ahead of us. Just because there no immediate punishment doesn’t mean it’s ok. Unfortunately, the ultimate judgment does come but it comes at the end.

We read in the haftorah ‘Shuva Yisroel ad Hashem Elokecha ki chashalta b’avonecha’. The words ‘ad Hashem elokecha’ would seem to imply ad v’lo ad bichlal, that you won’t be able to reach Hashem. Says Reb Shmelke m’Nickelsberg, someone who had lived his entire life doing forbidden acts may say I can’t reach perfection anyways so why try? I have been sinning for thirty years so how can I expect to reach perfection in one week?

The answer is do it slowly; Ad Hashem elokecha; pursue teshuva until you can reach Hashem. Let’s approach Rosh Hashana with the right mindset and know that we can’t change a whole year’s worth of not being so good in a week. Change is what we need and change, although uncomfortable, is what we can all do. Slowly, ad Hashem elokecha, will eventually get us to merit the coming of Moshiach, b’karov.

WISHING YOU A KSIVA V’CHASIMA TOV & A GUT G’BENTCHED YUR

Hilchos Uminhagei Rosh Hashana 5774

Wednesday, September 4th, 2013

rakThe following is meant as a convenient review of Halachos pertaining to Rosh Hashana. The Piskei Din for the most part are based purely on the Sugyos, Shulchan Aruch and Ramah, and the Mishna Berura, unless stated otherwise. They are based on my understanding of the aforementioned texts through the teachings of my Rebeim. As individual circumstances are often important in determining the psak in specific cases, and as there may be different approaches to some of the issues, one should always check with one’s Rov first.

Rabbi Krakowski is the Rov Hamachshir for OU Kashrus in Eretz-Yisroel. He served as Rov of Kehilas Torah Vechssed. Rabbi Krakowski is a posek and Motz in Rechavia and Shaarei Chesed neighborhoods of Yerushalyim. Rabbi Krakowski learned in Beis Hamedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore, Shaar HaTorah Grodna in Queens, South Fallsburg, and Brisk.

Erev Rosh Hashana:

1)      Fasting Erev Rosh Hashana: Some people have a Minhag to fast on Erev Rosh Hashana.

a)      A person does not have to accept the fast upon himself at Mincha the day before (as is nescesary by other voluntary fasts), but rather can choose to fast upon awakening on Erev Rosh Hashana.

i)        Nowadays many don’t fast at all, but many of those who fast do so only until after Chatzos.

(1)   If someone fasts until after davening Mincha, he should say “Aneinu” in the Mincha Shmonei Esrei.

ii)      There are those that fast until close to the beginning of Rosh Hashana. They end their fast before Rosh Hashana so as not to come into the Yom-Tov fasting (as this may be forbidden).

b)      Women do not fast on Erev Rosh Hashana.

c)      As this fast isn’t obligatory there is no need to educate (be Mechanech) children to fast.

2)      There are those that are Noheg to go to Jewish cemeteries Erev Rosh Hashana.

a)      If this is someone’s Minhag, the person should go and be careful not to daven to the deceased but rather to daven to Hashem in the zechus (merit) of the deceased.

i)        There are those that maintain it is also alright to beseech the deceased to be meilitz yosher for them.

b)      After going to the Kevarim the Minhag is to give Tzedaka.

c)      If this is not one’s Minhag, one should not start to do so.

3)      We are noheg that men go to the mikvah Erev Rosh Hashana.

a)      If one isn’t noheg to do so, it may nevertheless be worth taking it on as there isn’t any Halachik argument against it, and it is a highly accepted and widespread Minhag.

i)        It is prohibited for fathers and sons to go to the Mikvah together; this includes the changing areas and any other areas in which there is no privacy. As this is not an issue of Kibud Av (respect for the father), but rather a matter of tznius (modesty/self-respect), the father is not at liberty to be ‘mochel’ (to forgo such privacy).

(1)   If a father requires the assistance ofa son then the son may come with him for the purpose of assisting his father (e.g. a father who is old or handicapped etc.).

ii)      For the same reason, it is likewise prohibited for brothers-in-law to go to the Mikvah together.

b)      As the reason for this minhag is to purify everyone even from doubt as to possible minor impurities (Tumas Keri), the issue of educating children who are not of age does not arise.

c)      Taking into account both 3a and 3b above, young boys – especially those too young to go without their father’s supervision – shouldn’t be brought to the Mikvah. This applies not only to Erev Rosh Hashana, but to all other times as well.

d)      When getting undressed before immersing in the mikva one should first remove their shirt/(undershirt) and then their underpants unless they are wearing a very long shirt that covers the mila (see Meseches Derech Eretz Rabba and Zuta).

e)      If someone who has taken on the minhag of going to the Mikvah, cannot do so, that individual should try to pour 9 kabin of water upon himself (there is some argument among the authorities as to what this corresponds within our system of measures, but the equivalent of  8 gallons should suffice).

i)        Some maintain that even if this water isn’t contained within a vessel but rather comes from a steady stream such as a shower that it is sufficient.

(1)   For Erev Rosh Hashana purposes one may be lenient, but for other purposes (such as burial preparations (Taharas Hameis) one should not.

 

1) The Gemorah tells us that “Simana Milsa” (symbolism works).  In keeping with that dictum     Chazal tell us that we should eat foods on the night of Rosh Hashana that have a positive  connotation associated with them (and likewise not to eat things that have a negative connotation to them). These connotations may be caused by taste or name of the food.

a) There are many such foods mentioned in the Gemorah and more that are mentioned by the various Mefarshim and Poskim. The Meforshim and Poskim also explain that we may create our own symbolic foods.

i) There is no right or wrong number of symbolic foods to eat. There is no obligation per say to eat any of these foods in particular, but the more the better.

As it is a matter of debate amongst the Meforshim as to how symbolism works it is therefore crucial to say some sort of Yehi Ratzon upon eating these symbolic foods. Should one wish to introduce his own symbolic food, he should also create a Yehi Ratzon to go along with it. This may be done in any language.

b)      As many of these foods (such as random fruits) are not generally consumed at the beginning of a meal (as an integral part of the meal) we must recite a bracha prior to eating them (even though we already made a Hamotzi).

i) If both Haetz and Haadama need to be recited Haetz should be recited first.

ii) Although personal preference is often a factor influencing which fruit we select to say the bracha on first, the situation here is different. Since we are eating these foods mainly for symbolic purposes, and not based on our personal preferences, we should make the Bracha on a Shivas Haminim (the Seven species of Israel) item first.

c)      Most people are Noheg to dip Chalah in honey instead of salt.

i.      Some Acharonim say that we should still place salt on the table during Hamotzi (this is because of lo tashbis melach…).

d)      There are those who say, based on mystical sources (Al pi Kabbolah) that one should dip the Chalah in salt even if one dips it in honey.

e)      Just as what we eat may have some sort of symbolic power – so too how we act and what we do can also have an impact on our new year.

 

Tekias Shofar (Shofar Blowing): 

1)      Biblically all men (above Bar Mitzva) are obligated to hear the sound of the Shofar.

a)      Chazal tell us that all women accepted Tekias Shofar upon themselves and are therefore also required to hear Tekias Shofar.

2)      Halachically speaking, although we blow the Tekios during Shmoneh Esrei [there are various Minhagim as to whether we do so during the silent Shmoneh Esrei or during the repetition (Chazoras Hashatz)] whether or not one has heard or said the brachos doesn’t affect one’s fulfillment of hearing the Shofar.

a)      However, some of the Acharonim (see for instance the Pnei Yehoshua) maintain that it does affect one’s (at least optimum) fulfillment of Tekias Shofar. Therefore it is best to try to listen to every word (and at least to answer amen to every Bracha) of the Shatz, or in Kehilos that blow during the silent Amida to keep up with the Shatz/Baal Toke’a.

i)        If the above interferes with one’s concentration on the davening, one need not worry about it.

b)      Women do not need to hear Tekias Shofar with Shmoneh Esrei.

(1)   If women are fulfilling their Tekias Shofar obligation by listening to someone blow the Shofar for them who has already fulfilled his own obligation, this latter should not recite the bracha, but should rather let one of the women do so.

(2)   If a man who already fulfilled his obligation is blowing for another male he may say the bracha. In such a case, it is preferable that the individual now fulfilling his obligation should recite the blessing – not the Toke’a. The Toke’a should, however, recite the blessing if he is helping an entire group to fulfill their obligation.

 

Tashlich:

1)      Tashlich is a minhag and not an obligation (Chiyuv).

a)      While it is preferable to do Tashlich on Rosh Hashana, one can also do so during the entire Aseres Yemei Teshuva (Ten Days of Repentance).

b)      The preferred locale for Tashlich is a natural body of water.

i)        There is an additional preference for saying Tashlich near a body of water in which there are fish. Fish, from a mystical (Kabalistic) perspective, are seen as protecting from the Ayin Horah.

(1)   The Poskim are strongly opposed (for Halachik reasons) to throwing bread crumbs into the water on Yom-Tov.

c)      In Yerushalayim the Minhag is to say Tashlich at the communal wells (even though they have already been sealed for many years.

d)      It is has been said (see Maaseh Rav) that The Vilna Gaon didn’t go to say Tashlich. It isn’t clear whether he didn’t say Tashlich at all, or whether he simply didn’t go to a body of water to say it (Reb Elya Ber Wachtfogel).

i)        If one cannot easily make it to a body of water to recite Tashlich it is recommended to say Tashlich wherever one happens to be.

ii)      If someone won’t be able to say Tashlich on a body of water on Rosh Hashana it is recommended to say Tashlich on Rosh Hashana anyway and then again during Aseres Yemei Teshuva, or until Hoshana Rabba (Rabbi Elya Ber Wachtfogel Shlita – see earlier mention).

 

Second Night Rosh Hashana: 

 

  1. As Rosh Hashana is a two day Yom-Tov everywhere (even in Eretz-Yisroel) both days are considered by Chazal to be the same Yom-Tov – the Talmudic expression for this being ‘yoma arichta’ (the two days are seen Halachically as ‘one long day”). The question therefore arises as to whether one should make a shehechianu in Kiddush the second night of Rosh Hashana.  To remedy this concern the Poskim suggest that we either wear a new garment (one worthy of a shehechianu, i.e. an important garment of the sort bought infrequently) or have a new fruit worthy of a shehechianu (a fruit that one hasn’t had for a long period of time  and one is excited to have). If one doesn’t have any such item a shehechianu should be recited anyway.
    1. Women lighting candles should also have in mind the new garment or fruit while reciting Shehechianu.
    2. If someone wore a new garment the first day and didn’t make a shehechianu on it (for whatever reason), they then can recite a shehechianu on it the second night (if they are still wearing it).
    3. Contemporary Poskim have pointed out that there may be an issue of making a shehechianu on a fruit that is available all year round, and as nowadays most fruit are available all year round it is advisable to find a more exotic fruit.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

Hilchos Yom-Tov (Rosh Hashana 5774)

Wednesday, September 4th, 2013

rakThe following is meant as a convenient review of Halachos pertaining to Yom Tov. The Piskei Din for the most part are based purely on the Sugyos, Shulchan Aruch and Ramah, and the Mishna Berura, unless stated otherwise. They are based on my understanding of the aforementioned texts through the teachings of my Rebeim. As individual circumstances are often important in determining the psak in specific cases, and as there may be different approaches to some of the issues, one should always check with one’s Rov first.

Rabbi Krakowski is the Rov Hamachshir for OU Kashrus in Eretz-Yisroel. He served as Rov of Kehilas Torah Vechssed. Rabbi Krakowski is a posek and Motz in Rechavia and Shaarei Chesed neighborhoods of Yerushalyim. Rabbi Krakowski learned in Beis Hamedrash and Mesivta of Baltimore, Shaar HaTorah Grodna in Queens, South Fallsburg, and Brisk.

Yom-Tov is similar to Shabbos in many ways. On Shabbos and Yom-Tov it is forbidden to do Melacha. There are 39 Melachos that are forbidden on Shabbos and Yom-Tov. Doing Melacha on Shabbos is a capital crime, while doing Melacha on Yom-Tov is punishable by lashes.

On Yom-Tov there are various exceptions to Issur Melacha. These exceptions are based on the Passuk that allows us to do Melachos required for Ochel Nefesh – food preparation. Chazal explain that once a Melacha was allowed by the Torah for food preparation the Torah sometimes “so to speak” permitted it for certain other purposes as well.  At the same time, Chazal explain that the there are certain instances and certain Melachos that even for food preparation purposes aren’t permitted. The following is meant to outline when Melachos are permitted on Yom-Tov and to explain the extent to which they are permitted.

Many of the Halachos that are particular to Yom-Tov such as Hilchos Shechita and the Halachos pertaining to harvesting aren’t so applicable in most Frum communities nowadays and therefore will not be discussed.

When are you allowed to do Melachos for food preparation:

  1. The Melachos that are generally allowed on Yom-Tov are: Melachos that are absolutely necessary for food preparation (i.e. Shechita and similar Melachos)
    1. These Melachos are only permitted if they cannot be done before Yom-Tov, or if they involve items that are considered considerably better fresh (i.e. kneading and baking bread is thus permitted on Yom-Tov while in most circumstances it is prohibited to harvest or grind flour on Yom-Tov).
    2. Even when particular Melachos are permitted on Yom-Tov they cannot be done in a way that is a Zilzul in Yom Tov.
  2. The Torah allowed the preparation of food items on Yom-Tov only so that there should be what to eat on Yom-Tov. Therefore, the Melachos that are allowed on Yom-Tov are only allowed in order to prepare for Yom-Tov itself. Items that are intended for use for only after Yom-Tov cannot be prepared on Yom-Tov.
    1. Food that is left over after Yom-Tov is all right to use.

                                                               i.      One may prepare food in generous amounts on Yom-Tov even if it is  likely that it will be more than enough for Yom-Tov. This is so long as it could theoretically (and may) be consumed during Yom-Tov.

  1. Even when Yom-Tov is on Erev Shabbos food may not be prepared for Shabbos. (Please see the separate section on Hilchos Eruv Tavshilin to see what can be done in order to allow oneself to be able to prepare for Shabbos on Yom-Tov).
  2. Since food can only be prepared for Yom-Tov use one may not prepare food for a non-Jew on Yom-Tov.

                                                               i.      One should preferably not invite a gentile to come over (to eat) on Yom-Tov.

  1. If there is fear of creating animosity from the gentile towards Jews, it is then permissible to invite or allow a gentile to come and partake in a meal on Yom-Tov.
    1. Special care should be taken to make sure not to cook anything specifically for the gentile. Likewise care should be taken to ensure that one doesn’t add more to an already cooking item in order to have more for the gentile. However if more is being added for the sake of Jews than extra may be added for the gentile as well.

                                                             ii.      When someone has non-Jewish workers (i.e. maids etc.) working in one’s home during Yom-Tov, one cannot prepare food for them.

  1. The best thing to do is to allow them to take from already cooked food that was cooked for everyone else.
  2. It is important to remember that one should not allow the goy to cook for himself/herself as this would present Bishul akum issues and would render the pots/pans etc. not Kosher.
    1. If a goy did cook for himself/herself with your utensils ask your Rov whether Kashering is required.

                                                            iii.      It is preferable not to send gifts of food to a gentile on Yom-Tov. If this cannot be avoided then it should be sent from food that was made without the gentile in mind. No matter what, it cannot be prepared specifically for the goy.

  1. As mentioned earlier, in a pinch one could add extra food for a non-Jew either when initially placing the food to cook, or if one is adding anyway for Jews as well.
  2. One may not light a new fire from scratch on Yom-Tov. However one may light a new flame from a preexisting flame.

                                                               i.      One may raise a preexisting flame on a gas stove

                                                             ii.      On an electric stove one cannot raise the heat setting.

  1. There are some models that may work in a way that one could raise the heat setting. Anyone who thinks he may have such a stove top should consult with a competent Halachic authority.

                                                            iii.       One may light a gas flame if one does so by using an existing flame to light the new one (e.g. by taking an already lit candle or lighting a match from an already lit candle). When lighting a stovetop with a spark igniter special care must be taken to make sure not to initiate any sparks (i.e. one must open the gas directly and not press on the igniting mode – this can generally be detected by the click click of the stove).

  1. After lighting the stove one should be careful not to extinguish the candle or match used for lighting the gas (one should rather let it burn out).
  2. One may not extinguish a flame or fire on Yom-Tov.
    1. On a standard electric stove one cannot turn down the coil even if the indicator light is off. If the indicator light is off and the coil is black then one can turn down and even turn off the particular heating element.
    2. A gas flame should not be turned down.

                                                               i.      Many of the poskim were lenient if someone’s food would burn without turning down the flame. However this leniency would only apply if one does not have the option of lighting an additional flame at a lower setting.

                                                             ii.      A gas flame which is not attached to a gas line but rather to a gas balloon (as is frequent in Yerushalayim) may be turned down if someone is worried that there will not be enough gas to last until he end of Yom-Tov otherwise.

  1. One may bake or cook in an oven that was left on over Yom-Tov.
    1. If one has a gas oven that can be lit safely with a preexisting flame, one may then do so.

                                                               i.      Older or industrial ovens that have a pilot light may be lit on Yom-Tov without a using another preexisting flame.

                                                             ii.      The flame on a gas oven can be raised whenever the flame is on (when there is a mechanical dial.  If raising the temperature up can only be done by using buttons, or if there is a digital temperature control mechanism, one may not alter the oven setting at all). Therefore before raising the temperature in a gas oven one should check to make sure that the flame is on.

  1. An electric oven cannot be lit on Yom-Tov.

                                                               i.      If the coil is red and the oven indicator light is on then the temperature may be raised.

  1. With regard to lowering the temperature please refer to the halachos of lowering stove tops (4 a, and b).
  2. One may remove undesired pieces of food from the desired pieces if there are more of the desired parts. If the undesirable pieces are more than the desirable pieces then the desirable pieces should be removed instead.
    1. One may not sift flour on Yom-Tov.

                                                               i.      If the flour has already been sifted before Yom-Tov and the point of sifting it again is only to air out the flour, one may then sift the flour.

                                                             ii.      In general most sifters should  not be used for sifting most foods.

  1. One can rinse vegetables on Yom-Tov to clean them from bugs or from dirt.
  2. One should not grind spices, but one is permitted to crush them.
  3. Salt should not be ground or crushed on Yom-Tov.
    1. If someone needs to crush/grind salt on Yom-Tov one should do so with a שינוי  – in an unusual manner (i.e. not in a salt grinder, but rather by taking a spoon or the like and crushing the salt into finer granules).
  4. One is not permitted to squeeze juice from a fruit on Yom-Tov.
    1. One may squeeze the juice from a fruit onto a piece of food as on Shabbos.
  5. One cannot measure even ingredients with standard measuring cups on Yom Tov; one should rather approximate.
  6. One may carry in the public domain (or from one domain to another) on Yom-Tov even if is not for the sake of food. However one should not carry something that will not be used on Yom-Tov.
    1. If there is an Eiruv, then one may carry in public domain (or from one domain to another) anything that is not muktzeh (as on Shabbos) even if the item will not be used on Yom-Tov.
  7. One may light a fire from a preexistent flame on Yom-Tov for the purpose of warming oneself.
    1. The halachos pertaining to modern day heaters are similar to those of ovens and stoves (please refer to those sections).
    2. One may warm water on Yom-Tov to bathe a baby or to wash their face.

                                                               i.      It is prohibited to wash one’s entire body (even part by part) with warm water on Yom-Tov.

  1. One may use the mikve as on Shabbos.
  2. Shabbos timers can be adjusted on Yom-Tov in the following ways:
    1. To stay on longer both while the timer is in the “on” mode and while the timer is in the “off” mode.
    2. To stay off longer while the timer is in the “off” mode.
    3. The timer may not be adjusted to turn off earlier while the timer is in the “on” mode.
    4. The timer may be adjusted to turn off earlier while the timer is in the “off” mode.
    5. A timer may be used in the aforementioned ways to help with electronic cooking and heating/cooling devices.

                                                               i.      It is best to alter the settings in an unusual way (i.e. one should use a toothpick to pull out or push in the pegs) this applies to entire section 13.

                                                             ii.      Obviously one may only alter the setting on a mechanical basis and not when it involves electronic buttons or digital displays (this also applies to entire section 13).

Other Halachos of Yom-Tov:

  • During the times of the Batei Mikdash everyone would purify themselves by immersing in a mikve. This was done as a prerequisite for entering the Har-Habayis. Nowadays it is customary to go to the Mikve Erev Yom Tov (for Halachos pertaining to the mikve please see Hilchos Rosh Hashana or Yom-Kippur documents).
  • On Yom-Tov one (all men are) is required to spend approximately half their day in Torah study and half their day doing things they enjoy. If someone enjoys learning Torah it is needless to say they can do so for the majority of the day. (On Rosh Hashana until after davening one should be apprehensive and fearful of his judgment. After Davening one should be very happy and content that certainly his judgment was favorable).
  • One should wear their nicest clothing on Yom-Tov.
  • One should try to eat a portion of meat (preferably beef, lamb, or something that could have been brought for a Korban) and drink a portion of wine on Yom-Tov.
  • A married man should buy his wife something new for Yom-Tov (e.g. jewelry and/or clothing). One should also buy their children something for Yom-Tov (as most children don’t especially enjoy new clothing it is best to by them some sort of toy or special candy item).

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

B’Ohel Haneviyim: Parshas Nitzavim-Vayelech 5773

Friday, August 30th, 2013

This week’s Haftorah is the last of the שבע דנחמתא. It is once again (like all of the שבע דנחמתא) a Nevuah of Yishayohu. The Haftorah is extremely interesting by its character. Unlike the rest of the Shiva Denechemta, it doesn’t only focus on our being redeemed from exile. In addition, our Haftorah centers on Hashem cleansing Am-Yisroel from the Umos HaOlam. The Navi tells us that the Goyim will not drink our wine anymore. Rather, we – the ones who will have been gathered in – will be the ones to drink it.

Why does the Navi state that we will be the ones to harvest our wine? The Torah tells us that when we do Retzon Hashem the Goyim will do our work for us. When the Geula comes the world will be Utopia realized; the entire world will recognize Hashem as Omnipotent, and will recognize Am-Yisroel as the “Am-Hanivchar”. It therefore stands to reason that after the Geula we will be able to focus on Talmud Torah and that the Umos-HaOlam will tend to our needs. The Navi in various places (including some of the other Haftoros of (נחמה tell us clearly that the Nations of the world will serve us and do our work for us. The Navi even tells us that their princes, princesses, and officers will be simple servants. All this strengthens the question: why does the Haftorah imply that we will harvest our own grapes?

While there is a lot of anti-Jewish behavior in the world, by-en-large we are a well-treated people. This is because most of the Jews in the Diaspora live in the United States and the USA is a Medina Shel Chesed. America for the most part takes good care of its Jews. In Eretz-Yisroel we too receive significant financial assistance from the USA. Additionally, in Israel there is a growing element of so called ‘Israel friendly christians’ who are pumping money into all sorts of projects to ‘help’ Israel, and also often come as volunteers, etc. While all these things help us live well, they are in reality keeping, or actually making us dependent on them, thereby allowing us to fall prey Chas-VeShalom to them. In fact it is quite clear that this is the intent of ‘Israel Friendly Christians’. They believe that their יש”ו is going to come again and that his ‘coming’ will be the end of us ‘non-believers’.

Sometimes the helper is essentially making the one being helped dependent. Sometimes the one being helped is really allowing the one helping to be productive.

The Haftorah is bringing out a very important point. The Navi has told us over and over again that one day all the nations of the world will want to help us. However our Haftorah is telling us that we won’t be at all dependent on the Goyim. The Navi is telling us that we will not need to give the Goyim our wine because we will completely own it. We will have true independence and will own our land and our wine.

Real freedom is independence.

A very warm Good Shabbos, Rabbi Y. Dov Krakowski

HaRav Zev Leff: Parshas Nitzavim-Valelech

Friday, August 30th, 2013

Do Not Separate Yourself from the Community

Today you are all standing before Hashem your G-d (Devarim 29-:9).

After the ninety-eight curses that Bnei Yisrael heard at the end of Ki Savo, they were devastated and questioned whether they could possibly withstand such terrible punishments. Moshe Rabbeinu encouraged them with the opening words of this week’s parashah: — Today you are all standing.” Although you have sinned many times, all of you still stand today before Hashem.

Was Moshe trying to minimize the severity of the Divine reproof or imply that it was only a threat that would not be carried out? Furthermore, how could Moshe say that all were alive and well despite their sins, when in fact tens of thousands had perished in the Desert?

Rather Moshe’s intention was to assure the Jewish people that the purpose of the curses was not to wreak vengeance on them for their sins, but to insure their survival as a nation. And, therefore he told them collectively — kulchem — you still stand today. After all the sins and all the punishments , the tzibbur (community) is eternal. The concept of death does not exist with respect to the community. Those who perished died not as individuals, but as a part of Knesses Yisrael, which is eternal, and therefore they still survive.

Conversely, one who separates himself from the community and says, — I will do as I see fit,” will not be forgiven and will be utterly destroyed. Our relationship to Hashem is only through the tzibbur. The Torah was not given to individuals; nor were the covenants made with individuals. Our relationship to Hashem is as members of Knesses Yisrael. Rambam (Hilchos Teshuvah 3:24) classifiers an apikores (heretic) as one who keeps all the mitzvos but separates himself from the Jewish people. Without a link to Klal Yisrael, there can be no link to Hashem and Torah.

Hillel taught (Pirkei Avos 2:5): “Do not separate yourself from the community.” The Mishnah then continues with what seems on the surface to be additional, unrelated teachings of Hillel. However, a surface to be additional, unrelated teachings of Hillel. However, a deeper study of the Mishnah reveals that they are in fact the rebuttal of various arguments for cutting oneself off from the community.

“Do not believe in yourself until the day you die.” Do not think that you are strong enough spiritually to function on your own without the supportive community of Torah observers. Do not rely on your apparent spiritual security, for it is never guaranteed.

“Do not judge your fellow until you have reached his place.” In your criticism of the other members of the community, don’t convince yourself that you would be better off separated from them. Rather judge them favorably and understand the circumstances that generate those actions which offend you. See their good points. Avoid what is negative without separating yourself entirely.

“Do not make a statement that cannot be easily understood on the ground that it will be understood eventually.” People are sometimes frustrated that their views and opinions are not accepted by the tzibbur, but one must realize that the fault may lie in his views and not in the tzibbur. Perhaps his opinions are not fit to be heard and accepted.

And finally, “Do not say, ‘when I have time I will learn,’ for perhaps you will never have time.” There ar those who feel that the community responsibilities infringe too greatly on their time and potential for personal development. They therefore conclude that disassociating themselves form communal involvement will give them more time to learn. Never reckon that time can be generated by avoiding a mitzvah. That time might never materialize. Hashem will not permit one to benefit by neglecting his communal responsibilities.

One of the benefits of being part of the klal is that as part of a united entity one’s individual failings may be overlooked. Knesses Yisrael is eternal, pure, and holy, and one benefits by strengthening his connection to it. But he cannot reap the benefits from the tzibbur without accepting the concomitant responsibilities. Do not delude yourself that “Lema’an sfos harava es hatzeme’a” — that two adjacent fields are of necessity irrigated together, even though only one of them deserves the water. That is a fantasy.

Although each individual must be concerned with his personal judgment on Rosh Hashanah, as a tzibbur we dress up and eat as a sign of confidence that Hashem will exonerate us as members of the klal. The Ten Days of Repentance are days for intensifying our link to the tzibbur. For that reason, every individual during that period has the same assurance that his entreaties to Hashem will be heard that the tzibbur does year round. During those days the individual and the tzibbur become one.

Thus, the shaliach tzibbur on Rosh Hashanah is granted a special power to represent every individual, even those who are proficient in prayer, and therefore not included in the shaliach tzibbur’s prayers the rest of the year.

Elisha offered to pray for the childless Shunamite woman on Rosh Hashanah. But she responded, “I dwell amongst my nation.” Rabbi Chaim Shmulevitz explains her response: “Don’t single me out, for the power of the tzibbur is greater even than the prayer of G-d’s chosen prophet.”

Parsha Potpourri: Parshas Nitzavim-Vayeilech

Friday, August 30th, 2013

Hanistaros L’Hashem Elokeinu v’haniglos lanu ul’vaneinu ad olam la’asos es kol Divrei haTorah hazos (29:28)

One afternoon in Jerusalem, Rabbi Yakov Vann was on his way to the synagogue for the afternoon prayers when somebody called out from a doorway asking him to complete a minyan in a house of mourning. He gladly agreed to pray with the mourners, but upon entering the apartment, he was surprised to observe that although it was full of seforim (sacred Jewish books), the mourners themselves did not appear to be religiously observant.

After the prayer service had concluded, Rabbi Vann took out a Mishnah Berurah to examine it, and he was even more taken aback to see that its margins were full of astute insights and comments. He inquired about the owner of the seforim, and one of the mourners replied that they all belonged to the deceased, his father. Rabbi Vann probed further, asking whether any of the other family members used the books. Sadly, the son responded that although his father had been a very pious and learned Torah scholar, none of his children had followed in his ways. He explained that when his father came home each night, he would lock himself in his study and spend hours poring over his beloved tomes. However, because his Torah study only occurred behind closed doors and not in the presence of his family, his children never observed him learning and therefore did not absorb his passion for Torah and mitzvos.

As Rabbi Vann wistfully left the mourners, he realized that this encounter gave him a newfound appreciation of a novel Torah thought that he had recently heard. In Parshas Nitzavim, Moshe told the Jewish people Hanistaros L’Hashem Elokeinu v’haniglos lanu ul’vaneinu ad olam. Literally, this means that hidden things belong to Hashem our G-d, while those that are revealed are forever for us and our children. However, Rav Aharon Rokeach, the fourth Belzer Rebbe and uncle of the present Belzer Rebbe, suggested that the verse can be interpreted as follows: Hanistaros l’Hashem Elokeinu – if we hide our mitzvos by doing them privately, then only Hashem will know about our righteous ways. On the other hand, v’haniglos lanu ul’vaneinu – if we take a different approach and reveal our good deeds to our children, then our religious priorities and values will remain ad olam – for all eternity, as they will be carried on by our children and descendants for all generations, a lesson which Rabbi Vann understood all too well after his painful visit to the house of mourners.

Ki karov eilecha hadavar me’od b’ficha uvilvavcha la’asoso (30:14)

The Ponovezher Rav once traveled to South Africa to strengthen and encourage the Lithuanian Jews who had relocated there in their religious observance. Prior to his journey, he asked his teacher, the illustrious Chofetz Chaim, what message he should relate to the Jews there in the name of the leader of the generation.

The Chofetz Chaim replied that he should tell them that it is actually quite easy to do the mitzvah of teshuvah – repentance. The minimum requirements to fulfill this obligation are few and are within the reach of every Jew: ceasing to sin, confessing one’s past actions and expressing regret over them, and accepting upon oneself not to transgress again. Unfortunately, the evil inclination attempts to convince a person that proper repentance is so difficult and involves so many complex components that he will never succeed in correctly doing so, thereby causing him to give up the effort without even trying.

In this vein, Rav Nosson Wachtfogel notes that in our verse, Moshe describes one of the commandments as not being hidden or distant from a person. It isn’t in the heavens or across the sea as one might have thought, but rather it is very close – in one’s mouth and heart. What is this commandment which a person might mistakenly conclude is so far beyond him that its observance requires him to travel thousands or millions of miles, yet in reality the keys to its performance lie inside of him? Not surprisingly, the Ramban writes that the mitzvah to which Moshe is referring is the mitzvah of teshuvah.

The Gemora in Kiddushin (49b) discusses a case in which a wicked man betroths a woman on the condition that he is completely righteous. Surprisingly, the Gemora rules that she may be legally engaged, explaining that perhaps he had thoughts of repentance in the moment prior to his proposal. We may derive from here that a person can literally transform himself from one extreme to the other in a mere moment of sincere reflection and regret, a lesson which should inspire and motivate us during the approaching Yamim Noraim.

Hachaim v’hamaves nasati l’fanecha habracha v’haklala u’bacharta bachaim l’ma’an tichyeh atah v’zarecha (30:19)

Moshe exhorts the Jewish people: “I have placed before you life and death, blessing and curse. You shall choose life, so that you will live, you and your offspring.” These instructions seem redundant. Since Moshe already mentioned that the alternative to life is death, wouldn’t it have been sufficient to merely command us to choose life? Why was it necessary to add the phrase, “so that you will live, you and your offspring,” which seems superfluous after we were already told to choose life?

Rav Moshe Feinstein suggests that Moshe’s intention wasn’t to explain why a person should choose life or to spell out the self-evident consequences of doing so. Rather, he was adding critical information: the type of life that we should choose, namely one that will result in our children electing to follow in our footsteps.

Rav Moshe writes that the financial situation for many European immigrants was grim. Their refusal to work on Shabbos made it very difficult to find and keep a reliable paycheck. When they came home, they complained constantly about how hard it is to be an observant Jew. Although they remained committed to their religious ideals, they unintentionally educated their children to believe that Judaism is painful and requires great sacrifice. Not surprisingly, many of these children chose to abandon their family traditions. On the other hand, if parents stress the warmth and happiness which our faith offers, their children will naturally want to follow in their footsteps, and it is precisely this kind of life which Moshe commands us to choose.

Answers to the weekly Points to Ponder are now available!
To receive the full version with answers email the author at oalport@optonline.net.
Parsha Points to Ponder (and sources which discuss them):

1) Moshe told the people (30:12) that the Torah is not in Heaven. The Gemora in Bava Metzia (59b) understands this to mean that after the giving of the Torah at Mount Sinai, it is up to the Sages to decide legal matters, which are no longer within the jurisdiction of Hashem. When the Gemora is left with a difficult question which it is unable to answer, it concludes úé÷å, which is traditionally interpreted as an abbreviation indicating that Eliyahu will come and resolve the difficulty. Of what value will it be to hear the opinion of a prophet if legal questions may not be decided by Divine intervention? (Tosefos Yom HaKippurim Yoma 75a, Mishneh L’Melech Hilchos Ishus 9:6 and Gilyon Rav Akiva Eiger, Shu”t Chasam Sofer 6:98, Birkei Yosef Orach Chaim 32:4, Chavatzeles HaSharon Shemos 16:31)

2) Rashi writes (31:11) that the mitzvah of reading the book of Devorim in front of the people every 7 years was performed by the king. Was this mitzvah performed before the anointment of Shaul as king, and if so, by whom? (Chizkuni, Kiryat Sefer Hilchos Chagigah 3, HaEmek Davar, Chinuch and Minchas Chinuch 612, Ayeles HaShachar, Derech Sicha, Shiras Dovid)

3) The Gemora in Chagigah (3a) teaches that for the king’s reading of the book of Devorim (31:11), the men came to learn and the women came to listen. The Gemora questions why the Torah commands (31:12) that the small children be brought, and answers that it is to earn merits for their parents in bringing them. On a practical level, does this rationale apply to bringing small children to the synagogue? (Magen Avrohom 689:11, Mishnah Berurah 98:3 and 124:28)

4) The Rambam derives (Hilchos Tefillin 7:1) the mitzvah to write a Sefer Torah from the fact that the Torah commands (31:19) us to write “this song.” Because the Torah may not be written in individual sections, it must be a general commandment to write an entire Sefer Torah which will contain the song therein. Instead of requiring this roundabout derivation, why doesn’t the verse more directly command, “Write this Torah?” (Me’Rosh Amanah)

© 2013 by Oizer Alport.