<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Op-Ed: Bibi 4, Obama 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/editorial/93472/op-ed-bibi-4-obama-1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/editorial/93472/op-ed-bibi-4-obama-1.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 22:49:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladler</title>
		<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/editorial/93472/op-ed-bibi-4-obama-1.html#comment-219451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ladler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 06:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/?p=93472#comment-219451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nfgo3, what you fail to recognize is that Obama did indeed take a pro-Palestinian stance by stating even after returning to pre-1967 borders with some territory exchange for large settlement blocs, the major points of contention - the right of return and the status of Jerusalem - are still left open. For Israel to leave the right of return issue open after giving back as much land as she possibly can is suicidal. The poor Palestinian refugees will be the excuse to continuously bombard the remaining sliver of Israel with terrorist attacks. Besides which, there is no partner for peace anyway, so why talk about it? Pally children are raised from infancy to idolize shahids. Do you except them to accept Israel&#039;s right to exist? The only thing that would satisfy them is to see Hitler&#039;s Final Solution fully implemented.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nfgo3, what you fail to recognize is that Obama did indeed take a pro-Palestinian stance by stating even after returning to pre-1967 borders with some territory exchange for large settlement blocs, the major points of contention &#8211; the right of return and the status of Jerusalem &#8211; are still left open. For Israel to leave the right of return issue open after giving back as much land as she possibly can is suicidal. The poor Palestinian refugees will be the excuse to continuously bombard the remaining sliver of Israel with terrorist attacks. Besides which, there is no partner for peace anyway, so why talk about it? Pally children are raised from infancy to idolize shahids. Do you except them to accept Israel&#8217;s right to exist? The only thing that would satisfy them is to see Hitler&#8217;s Final Solution fully implemented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yehoshua Kehati</title>
		<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/editorial/93472/op-ed-bibi-4-obama-1.html#comment-219429</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yehoshua Kehati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 02:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/?p=93472#comment-219429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Hussein Obama&#039;s first speech was &quot;the camel&#039;s nose in the tent&quot;. And when the camel got swatted on the nose (so to speak) it reacted as camels do: by spitting in anger. 
When BHO is openly and strongly opposed, especially by some who are excellent speakers - even ad-libbing appropriately and effectively - his outrage and anger become poisonous. This hurts him and - eventually us - because he has only the image of himself and cannot tolerate others &#039;sharing the stage&#039; with him.  
I can imagine him imploding soon - seriously- and I hope those in &quot;the establishment&quot; who basically care about the USA have prepared plans for coping with this.  It will not be nice to see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Hussein Obama&#8217;s first speech was &#8220;the camel&#8217;s nose in the tent&#8221;. And when the camel got swatted on the nose (so to speak) it reacted as camels do: by spitting in anger.<br />
When BHO is openly and strongly opposed, especially by some who are excellent speakers &#8211; even ad-libbing appropriately and effectively &#8211; his outrage and anger become poisonous. This hurts him and &#8211; eventually us &#8211; because he has only the image of himself and cannot tolerate others &#8216;sharing the stage&#8217; with him.<br />
I can imagine him imploding soon &#8211; seriously- and I hope those in &#8220;the establishment&#8221; who basically care about the USA have prepared plans for coping with this.  It will not be nice to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wanderingchana</title>
		<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/editorial/93472/op-ed-bibi-4-obama-1.html#comment-219401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wanderingchana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 21:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/?p=93472#comment-219401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bibi in 2012??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bibi in 2012??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nfgo3</title>
		<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/editorial/93472/op-ed-bibi-4-obama-1.html#comment-219398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nfgo3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 21:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/?p=93472#comment-219398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This op-ed is a nice theatrical review, but I think it shows no insight into the real meaning of the kabuki theater that has been the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu&#039;s visit to the capital of Israel&#039;s major ally and supporter.  In particular, the author overlooks the most important information that has poured out of the mouths of the two main players, the President of the United States (played by Barack Obama) and the Prime Minister of Israel (played by Benjamin Netanyahu).  That information is that (1) the US president wants a negotiated settlement between the State of Israel and the Palestinian Authority which will provide for (a) defensible borders and (b) recognition of the State of Israel, (2) the US president will not support a proposal - expected to be brought to the UN General Assembly in September - to establish a Palestinian state, and (3) the Israeli PM insists that Israel cannot withdraw to the &#039;67 borders, which he considers indefensible.

All the rest of the show is aimed at Mr. Netanyahu&#039;s right-wing coalition partners and, perhaps, some American right-wing supporters of Israel, including some Jews and some evangelical Christians.  Mr. Troy fails to pick up on the fact that President Obama did not propose an Israeli withdrawal to the &#039;67 borders, and further fails to recognize the very clear statement that President Obama made to the Palestinian Authority:  no statehood without recognizing Israel and agreeing to borders which Israel deems defensible.  Mr. Netanyahu has played down that portion of the President&#039;s comments, probably for the purpose of pressuring his right-wing coalition partners to stay with him.  If anyone needs some schooling, Hebrew or otherwise, it is Mr. Troy, who cannot see that the US president is standing with the State of Israel as surely as any of his presidential predecessors.

Commenter No. 1:  I did not see Vice President Biden&#039;s alleged applause malfunction, but I feel no need to read anything into it when his boss, the President, has made his position so clear with words.  Perhaps if you paid more attention to the words, and less to the applause, you might begin to understand what is going on between Israel and the US.  Alternatively, perhaps you are focused on the ambiguity of Mr. Biden&#039;s conduct because the words of his boss are so clear, and so contrary to your preconceived notion that Mr. Obama is Israel&#039;s foe, that you latch on to an ambiguous source of information - Biden&#039;s applause or lack of applause - because it gives you more room to misinterpret things in a way that is consistent with your factless political analysis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This op-ed is a nice theatrical review, but I think it shows no insight into the real meaning of the kabuki theater that has been the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu&#8217;s visit to the capital of Israel&#8217;s major ally and supporter.  In particular, the author overlooks the most important information that has poured out of the mouths of the two main players, the President of the United States (played by Barack Obama) and the Prime Minister of Israel (played by Benjamin Netanyahu).  That information is that (1) the US president wants a negotiated settlement between the State of Israel and the Palestinian Authority which will provide for (a) defensible borders and (b) recognition of the State of Israel, (2) the US president will not support a proposal &#8211; expected to be brought to the UN General Assembly in September &#8211; to establish a Palestinian state, and (3) the Israeli PM insists that Israel cannot withdraw to the &#8217;67 borders, which he considers indefensible.</p>
<p>All the rest of the show is aimed at Mr. Netanyahu&#8217;s right-wing coalition partners and, perhaps, some American right-wing supporters of Israel, including some Jews and some evangelical Christians.  Mr. Troy fails to pick up on the fact that President Obama did not propose an Israeli withdrawal to the &#8217;67 borders, and further fails to recognize the very clear statement that President Obama made to the Palestinian Authority:  no statehood without recognizing Israel and agreeing to borders which Israel deems defensible.  Mr. Netanyahu has played down that portion of the President&#8217;s comments, probably for the purpose of pressuring his right-wing coalition partners to stay with him.  If anyone needs some schooling, Hebrew or otherwise, it is Mr. Troy, who cannot see that the US president is standing with the State of Israel as surely as any of his presidential predecessors.</p>
<p>Commenter No. 1:  I did not see Vice President Biden&#8217;s alleged applause malfunction, but I feel no need to read anything into it when his boss, the President, has made his position so clear with words.  Perhaps if you paid more attention to the words, and less to the applause, you might begin to understand what is going on between Israel and the US.  Alternatively, perhaps you are focused on the ambiguity of Mr. Biden&#8217;s conduct because the words of his boss are so clear, and so contrary to your preconceived notion that Mr. Obama is Israel&#8217;s foe, that you latch on to an ambiguous source of information &#8211; Biden&#8217;s applause or lack of applause &#8211; because it gives you more room to misinterpret things in a way that is consistent with your factless political analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hirsch</title>
		<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/editorial/93472/op-ed-bibi-4-obama-1.html#comment-219381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Hirsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 18:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/?p=93472#comment-219381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vice President Joe Biden also lost the battle when he was one of the only men in the room that failed to applaud Netanyahu&#039;s statement about an undivided Jerusalem. This too was probably just &#039;tough love&#039; and is no departure from previous administrations (Charlie and nfgo3, right?).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vice President Joe Biden also lost the battle when he was one of the only men in the room that failed to applaud Netanyahu&#8217;s statement about an undivided Jerusalem. This too was probably just &#8216;tough love&#8217; and is no departure from previous administrations (Charlie and nfgo3, right?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
