Comments on: Cheney: Picking Palin For VP Was A ‘Mistake’

By: akuperma

akuperma — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:01:54 +0000

It doesn’t seem to have had an effect on the election, as the deciding factor was President Bush’s disastrous economic policies. Had Palen been the problem, one would not have seen a jump in McCain’s polling soon after the convention. In fact, it seems that undermined McCain was the economic collapse that began in mid-September.

By: UWSider

UWSider — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 12:55:47 +0000

informed-in-flatbush is sooo right.

Palin energized a VERY lethargic GOP and was the best defense against Obama.

McCain went to the NAACP and basically endorsed his competition. (Contrast that with Romney)

Palin had the guts to call Obama out on his miserable agenda and lack of any appreciable executive skills – and now were paying the price.

2008 was a referendum on Obama – at least she was able to prevent an absolute landslide.

By: Moose613

Moose613 — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:19:59 +0000

Mr. Cheney has stated the obvious – with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight.

By: coffee addict

coffee addict — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:19:52 +0000

mark,

actually the media did their job perfectly, they are democratic operatives

By: ahavas_yisroel

ahavas_yisroel — Sun, 29 Jul 2012 17:21:13 +0000

Based on what he says makes a VP qualified, how in the WORLD did Obama pass muster and become president???! Talk about unqualified!

By: informed-in-flatbush

informed-in-flatbush — Sun, 29 Jul 2012 17:13:21 +0000

As a governor, she had more executive experience than McCain. If it hadn’t been for Palin, McCain would have lost in a landslide.

By: mark levin

mark levin — Sun, 29 Jul 2012 17:01:33 +0000

Actually the real problem was following the media and choosing Johnny Mac in the first place. The second real problem was that the lamestream media failed to do its job and vet OblameO.

By:

Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:19:23 +0000

Is this his way of warning MR not to pick Condi Rice?