Comments on: Bizarre Coincidence: Democrats Get More Time in All Three Debates

By: mark levin

mark levin — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:39:17 +0000

I hope the republicans INSIST on Fox News debates next time with Hannity, Limbaugh, & Levin on the moderating team!

By: uneeq

uneeq — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:58:12 +0000

Bizarre coincidence it is not. It is reported that Romney was interrupted 28 times by Crowley while obama was interrupted only 9 times. So Romney gets to speak less even though he had more time on the clock to finish his thoughts. The liberal bias of the media and the moderator is so blatantly clear. (That’s ignoring the failed fact check by crowley about Libya when she grilled axelrod days earlier that obama never called it terrorism.)

By: Rainus

Rainus — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:41:05 +0000

This shouldn’t surprise anyone. These debates are all sponsored by left-wing, liberal media outlets, who favour an Obama win.
But it doesn’t make a difference anyway. It just means that Obama got to speak more drivel longer.
Another thing to look at is that from watching the debate, I seem to recall that Romney finished his expositions without prompting from the moderator, whereas Obama had to constantly be told be the moderator that he’d run out of time.

By: YonasonW

YonasonW — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:44:08 +0000

“Bizarre Coincidence” Apikoras!!

By: mark levin

mark levin — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:28:47 +0000

Shocker??? NO WAY!!!

If the R&R boys were as animalistic and without derech eretz as the libs, they would get more time.

By: ahavas_yisroel

ahavas_yisroel — Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:19:44 +0000

You’re right! The Democrats are bizarre!