Search
Close this search box.

Trump Defends Sharing ‘Terrorism’ Facts With Russians


President Donald Trump defended revealing information to Russian officials, saying in a pair of tweets Tuesday that he shared “facts pertaining to terrorism and airline flight safety” and had “the absolute right” to do so.

Trump was responding to reports Monday that he revealed highly classified information to senior Russian officials during an Oval Office meeting last week, putting a source of intelligence on the Islamic State at risk.

But Trump tweeted that he shared the information for “humanitarian reasons, plus I want Russia to greatly step up their fight against ISIS & terrorism.”

Trump says he wanted to share with Russia “facts pertaining to terrorism and airline flight safety.” He noted that as president, he has an “absolute right” to do this.

The reports by The Washington Post and others drew strong condemnation from Democrats and a rare rebuke of Trump from some Republican lawmakers. White House officials denounced the report, saying the president did not disclose intelligence sources or methods to the Russians, though officials did not deny that classified information was disclosed in the May 10 meeting.

The president and the foreign minister reviewed a range of common threats to our two countries including threats to civil aviation,” said H.R. McMaster, Trump’s national security adviser. “At no time, at no time were intelligence sources or methods discussed and the president did not disclose any military operations that were not already publicly known.”

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson also disputed the Post report. He said Trump discussed a range of subjects with the Russians, including “common efforts and threats regarding counter-terrorism.” The nature of specific threats was discussed, he said, but not sources, methods or military operations.

The Post, citing current and former U.S. officials, said Trump shared details about an Islamic State terror threat related to the use of laptop computers on aircraft with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador to the U.S. Sergey Kislyak. The ambassador has been a central player in the snowballing controversy surrounding possible coordination between Trump’s campaign and Russia’s election meddling.

The anonymous officials told the Post that the information Trump relayed during the Oval Office meeting had been provided by a U.S. partner through an intelligence-sharing arrangement. They said it was considered so sensitive that details have been withheld from allies and tightly restricted even within the U.S. government.

The New York Times and BuzzFeed News published similar reports later Monday.

Russia’s foreign ministry spokesman denied the report. Maria Zakharova, a spokeswoman for the Russian foreign ministry, on Facebook on Tuesday described the reports as “yet another fake.”

The revelations could further damage Trump’s already fraught relationship with U.S. intelligence agencies. He’s openly questioned the competency of intelligence officials and challenged their high-confidence assessment that Russia meddled in last year’s presidential election to help him win. His criticism has been followed by a steady stream of leaks to the media that have been damaging to Trump and exposed an FBI investigation into his associates’ possible ties to Russia.

The disclosure also risks harming his credibility with U.S. partners around the world ahead of his first overseas trip. The White House was already reeling from its botched handling of Trump’s decision last week to fire James Comey, the FBI director who was overseeing the Russia investigation.

A European security official said sharing sensitive information could dampen the trust between the United States and its intelligence sharing partners. “It wouldn’t likely stop partners from sharing life-saving intelligence with the Americans, but it could impact the trust that has been built, particularly if sharing such information exposes specific intelligence gathering methods,” said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the person was not authorized to speak about such intelligence sharing.

The revelation also prompted cries of hypocrisy. Trump spent the campaign arguing that his opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, should be locked up for careless handling of classified information.

The Post said the intelligence partner had not given the United States permission to share the material with Russian officials. By doing so, Trump would have jeopardized cooperation from an ally familiar with the inner workings of the Islamic State group, and make other allies — or even U.S. intelligence officials — wary about sharing future top secret details with the president.

Afterward, White House officials took steps to contain the damage, placing calls to the CIA and the National Security Agency, the newspaper said.

The CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declined to comment Monday evening.

Congressional Republicans and Democrats expressed concern about the report.

GOP Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told reporters the Trump White House “has got to do something soon to bring itself under control and order.” He described the White House as “on a downward spiral.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York also called the story “disturbing,” adding, “Revealing classified information at this level is extremely dangerous and puts at risk the lives of Americans and those who gather intelligence for our country.”

The controversy engulfed the White House. Reporters spent much of the evening camped out adjacent to Press Secretary Sean Spicer’s office, hoping for answers. At one point, an eagle-eyed reporter spotted a handful of staffers, including Spicer and Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, walking toward the Cabinet Room.

(AP)



6 Responses

  1. Not only is this Fake News, it’s dangerous!!!
    These leaks have to stop!!!

    We don’t even know what was said, most of the stuff was public knowledge.

    What do We expect the president to tap to Russia about, ICE CREAM?

    Stupid people!!!

    This is bad for our country, someone in the FBI better do something to the Fake media!

  2. If Trump truly believes that “sharing” this information with Putin will make us safer, its time to say Tehillim along with some serious lamdus on the 25th Amendment. If, as most knowledgeable individuals have concluded, this was simply another blunder by the egotistical Trumpkopf seeking to “show off” his intelligence skills to his Russian Guests, he just managed to cut off his national security advisor and Sec of State at the knees, since both of them last night stated flatly that no such information was shared. This AM, their boss says, yeah, I shared it intentionally for reasons I don’t have to explain to anyone.

  3. The degenerate draft dodger has just abrogated his primary responsibility, the safety of the citizens of the country. It’s possible that our allies will stop sharing vital information since they know now they can’t trust this idiot to keep his big mouth shut! As the former head of the CIA said, the Russians can work backwards and figure out how and where we got this intelligence, they’re not dummies like trump! This is what happens when an incompetent know nothing is in charge, extremely dangerous.

  4. 1. Contrary to the hopes and dreams of the left wing, Donald Trump is President, and Commander-in-Chief, and decides what is and is not a state secret.

    2. Trump appears to feel that ISIS is the biggest regional threat, which explains why he is willing to “reboot” relations with Russia. Obama also wanted such a “reboot”, but Obama, unlike Trump, was willing to let the US get pushed around by the Russians,

  5. #1- let’s imagine the exact same scenario, but change the names to maybe Hillary or obama, what would you be saying then?
    Just because he’s president doesn’t mean he’s carrying out the responsibilities of the office properly and fulfilling the oath of office.

  6. Those defending Trump keep alluding to his broad authority to “declassify on the spot” any information he wants to without prior notice with his intelligence and security experts. That’s 100 percent correct and I’m not sure why they keep saying that since no one is claiming he lacks that authority. The issue is really whether this guy truly understands what he says or does at any point in time given his propensity to contradict himself without prior notice and assert what he just said is no longer truthful or operative because he says so. Also unclear why distinguished folks like his Sec State, National Security Advisor, DNI, etc. are willing to trash their own life-long record of service and continually lie under the bus and on some occasions, wait until it backs up a second time.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts