Comments on: Greenfield Announces Plan to Ensure that Children Are Safe In Schools

By: le7

le7 — Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:54:25 +0000

im impressed

By: MazelKGH

MazelKGH — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:06:50 +0000

I’m not from Brooklyn but I could not agree more with this. It is about time someone pulled the stuff out from under the carpet there. People in Brooklyn are lucky to have someone like Greenfield.

By: americaisover

americaisover — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:46:34 +0000

also yeshivas should get free security like in public school

By: Washington

Washington — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:37:57 +0000

Great law. Let’s fingerprint all our great Rebeim. Genius. But meanwhile in the scorching summer heat all these wondeful children that Greenfield is protecting from the Rebeim that cannot afford to go to summer camp at 3000 at each will unfortunately swelter it out by not being able to veer near the shoreline because as of yet not one of our remarkable Jewish politicians spitzer bloomberg schumer hikind lazar greenfield felder shall I go on has taken a minute out of his busy schedule of fingerprinting Rebeim (which was a real easy one to get by the Goyim council-they just love this one) in order to tell the Parks Department to set aside a couple of blocks of modest beaches – beaches that we own as citizens -but cannot use-for a hundred thousand upstanding citizens – Adath Yeshurun- to use. This fact is disturbing enough to sever the chords of reason and logic in anyones brain- to the point of which we can honestly beg Hashem: Send us a politician that can actually see what the people are going through. I know your answers. Mothers walking strollers with three kids in 90 degrees is a wonderful sight. That’s what they should be doing. Preparing food for Shabbos! Children on the hot city streets all summer without a break. Sure they should stay indoors in air conditioning all day. Yes there are programs for them. But sadly no beach no shoreline. Hail to our Jewish politicians! What a bunch of …….

By: Chavrusa O Mesusa

Chavrusa O Mesusa — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:34:46 +0000

The title and the details don’t seem to match.

Those criminal teachers who were not yet caught won’t necessarily have police records of interest to come up by their fingerprints.

If former criminals are no longer criminals, then why should their police records be relevant? If they are still criminals aren’t then in jail or under house arrest and not able to work in schools?

This does nothing to protect students from crimes perpetrated by other than repeat-offender teachers. New York public schools have tremendous numbers of crimes perpetrated by students.

If the title said “safer” or “safe from crimes by teachers with criminal records” I would not have felt a comment necessary.

Perhaps there are particular crimes this proposed law has in mind that would have been prevented?

By: NotMekabel

NotMekabel — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:50:53 +0000

Not only did the Agudah fight against this bill in 2006, but they have been fighting against it ever since! Now that they think it will help Greenfield win, they are telling him they will support it.

By: eli lev

eli lev — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:16:21 +0000

sounds good. but i’d like to know who[gedolim] exactly did he consult with?

By: ConcernedMom

ConcernedMom — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 05:11:58 +0000

Great Idea! Enough of unsuitable people working with our kids. Their place is in Jail not in our school system.

By: LeahBoroPark

LeahBoroPark — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 03:14:02 +0000

Mr. Greenfield, you just earned my families vote. Boruch Hashem, we finally have a politician who actually consults with gedolim BEFORE acting. That is a true kiddush Hashem. May Hashem grant you much hatzlacha! – Leah

By: WellInformedYid

WellInformedYid — Tue, 23 Mar 2010 01:32:25 +0000

I agree. It really is about time. I hope this means all Rabbeim and teachers. Any employee in a yeshivah should be fingerprinted. If anyone doesn’t like it, its probably because he is hiding something.

Id like them to make another rule. Shomer Negiah. No teachers/Rabbeim may physically touch a student. No need for pats on the back…find other ways to show fondness that don’t involve touching!