Comments on: Beit Shemesh Victim Questions Why Assailants Were Released

By: krulwich

krulwich — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 07:27:11 +0000

Congratulations #6 and #7 you’ve reached the level of the Rabbonim in the story of Kamtza u’Bar Kamtza.

First, I don’t think that she in fact entered a shul, she was doing her job for the city, which was hanging up signs outside around the city. If the problem was her going into a shul, (a) there are ways to say something, and (b) the trouble wouldn’t have continued outside at her car.

Second, anyone justifying or rationalizing frum Jews attacking a woman who was going about her job and bashing her car with rocks, is PART OF THE PROBLEM. Le’harim yad is rish’us, and chilul Hashem should never be justified.

By: tzd

tzd — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:09:02 +0000

It seems that she entered a shul to “hang up” her signs. While the behavior displayed by the “perpetrators” is inexcusable, it does seem that she was “looking for action”.

By: Loyal Jew

Loyal Jew — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 05:41:10 +0000

Even the government police know that Jews defend a shul when a provacatuer comes in to desecrate it.

By: zionflag

zionflag — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:46:07 +0000

#4 You are so wrong.

By: Softwords

Softwords — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:45:02 +0000

Am I the only one that feels something is fishy with her story? My Chush is that she faked the whole thing. Of course, I could be wrong, but it just seems so over the top.

By: torahyid

torahyid — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:04:08 +0000

The kanoim Reshaim are mocking Gdolai Yisroel

By: zionflag

zionflag — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:48:30 +0000

Same question is asked by MANY?
Why are these assailants out walking in the streets?

By: proud orthodox jew

proud orthodox jew — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:27:16 +0000

Maybe they were released because there wasn’t evidence? Duh!