<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buffett Says Free News Unsustainable, May Add More Papers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/headlines-breaking-stories/128589/buffett-says-free-news-unsustainable-may-add-more-papers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/headlines-breaking-stories/128589/buffett-says-free-news-unsustainable-may-add-more-papers.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 22:49:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: akuperma</title>
		<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/headlines-breaking-stories/128589/buffett-says-free-news-unsustainable-may-add-more-papers.html#comment-259422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[akuperma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/?p=128589#comment-259422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A better question is whether will pay extra for high quality journalism rather than free news sources that often aggregate rather than report. The experience of the Wall Street Journal suggests perhaps yes, but would that pay for newspapers with lower quality. For example, we all ready YWN for free, but would we pay extra for a competitor with YWN that covered the same materials but with higher quality journalist standards, including professional frum reporters.

Good journalism is something appreciated by those who are more important in decision making, but historically the masses prefer cheap entertainment. Does the option of free grape juice preclude offering expensive fine wines?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better question is whether will pay extra for high quality journalism rather than free news sources that often aggregate rather than report. The experience of the Wall Street Journal suggests perhaps yes, but would that pay for newspapers with lower quality. For example, we all ready YWN for free, but would we pay extra for a competitor with YWN that covered the same materials but with higher quality journalist standards, including professional frum reporters.</p>
<p>Good journalism is something appreciated by those who are more important in decision making, but historically the masses prefer cheap entertainment. Does the option of free grape juice preclude offering expensive fine wines?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
