Comments on: Grand Jury Documents Rife With Inconsistencies

By: BarryLS1

BarryLS1 — Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:54:44 +0000

#3. You have it backward, All the Forensic evidence and that of eye witnesses including Blacks, other than Brown’s partner in crime, corroborated the Officers testimony. Other people just lied and weren’t really there and admitted as such.

What it boiled down to is that your “stay the course to the protesters” President and Attorney General fed the flames and the protesters cared nothing about the facts. They wanted an indictment irrespective of the facts.

By: apushatayid

apushatayid — Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:56:47 +0000

In other words officer Wilson might be guilty of murder but prosecutor couldnt show up to court with evidence that a 6 the grader would shred to pieces when the standard is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Had the rabble rousers, racist anti white African Americans in the neighborhood stayed home and only truthful testimony was brought to grand jury, we might have seen an indictment.

By: Mark Levin

Mark Levin — Thu, 27 Nov 2014 04:46:20 +0000

I wonder why all the false witnesses aren’t brought up on charges of lying to investigators.

By: ANON21

ANON21 — Thu, 27 Nov 2014 04:34:41 +0000

Typical stuff. These people are so dumb they can’t differentiate between fact & fiction. Much of the propaganda is fiction & when they try to say over the story they get all confused.