Obama Aides Sharpen Criticism of Netanyahu Ahead of Speech

3

obbiThe strain between the U.S. and Israel deepened Wednesday, as top advisers to President Barack Obama sharply rebuked Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s upcoming speech to Congress as “destructive” and challenged his judgment on the Iran nuclear negotiations.

Netanyahu countered by accusing the U.S. and its negotiating partners of having “given up” on stopping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.

“They might accept this but I am not willing to accept this,” he said Wednesday night at a meeting of his Likud Party outside of Jerusalem.

Tensions between the U.S. and Israel have been on the rise since Netanyahu accepted an invitation from Republican leaders to address Congress on March 3. The speech was coordinated without the White House and State Department, a move the Obama administration blasted as a breach of diplomatic protocol.

National Security Adviser Susan Rice said in a television interview Tuesday that Netanyahu’s speech had “injected a degree of partisanship” into a relationship that should be above politics.

“It’s destructive to the fabric of the relationship,” Rice told the Charlie Rose show. “It’s always been bipartisan. We need to keep it that way.”

Her comments were followed by a sharp critique Wednesday from Secretary of State John Kerry, who said during congressional testimony that when it comes to the nuclear negotiations, Netanyahu “may have a judgment that just may not be correct here.”

Rice and Kerry’s statements were among the Obama administration’s toughest public criticism of Netanyahu’s speech and the negative impact his opposition to the Iran negotiations could have on the close alliances between the U.S. and Israel.

Ahead of his arrival in Washington, Netanyahu also turned down an invitation to meet privately with Senate Democrats, saying such a session could “compound the misperception of partisanship” surrounding his visit.

“I regret that the invitation to address the special joint session of Congress has been perceived by some to be political or partisan,” Netanyahu wrote in a letter to Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. “I can assure you that my sole intention in accepting it was to voice Israel’s grave concerns about a potential nuclear agreement with Iran that could threaten the survival of my country.”

A senior Democratic official said Feinstein was undecided on whether she would attend Netanyahu’s speech. More than a half-dozen Democratic lawmakers have said they would skip the address, with Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine becoming the latest to take that step Wednesday.

In announcing his decision, Kaine said Netanyahu’s speech was “highly inappropriate” given its proximity to Israel’s upcoming elections.

“There is no reason to schedule this speech before Israeli voters go to the polls on March 17 and choose their own leadership,” Kaine said in a statement. “I am disappointed that, as of now, the speech has not been postponed.”

U.S. officials believe Netanyahu’s trip is aimed primarily at derailing a nuclear deal with Iran, Obama’s signature foreign policy objective. While Netanyahu has long been skeptical of the negotiations, his opposition has increased over what he sees as Obama’s willingness to make concessions that would leave Iran on the brink of being able to build a nuclear weapon.

U.S. and Iranian officials reported progress in negotiations this week on a deal that would clamp down on Tehran’s nuclear activities for at least 10 years but then slowly ease restrictions. Israeli officials warned this week that such a deal would allow Iran to become a nuclear threshold state.

The U.S. and its negotiating partners — Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China — reached an interim agreement with Iran in late 2013 that froze key parts of the Islamic republic’s nuclear program in exchange for some relief from Western sanctions. U.S. officials argue that even the interim agreement has slowed Iran’s pursuit of a nuclear weapon.

“Israel is safer today with the added time we have given and the stoppage of the advances in the Iranian nuclear program than they were before we got that agreement, which by the way the prime minister opposed,” Secretary of State John Kerry said Wednesday, referring to Netanyahu. “He was wrong.”

The White House has been weighing ways to counter Netanyahu’s address to Congress, as well as separate speech to the annual policy conference of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. The administration is still weighing whom to send to the conference, with some officials pushing for a lower level representative than normal.

There are no plans for Obama to meet with Netanyahu next week, with the White House officially citing its practice of not engaging with world leaders in close proximity to elections.

Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry will be traveling abroad on trips that were only announced after Netanyahu accepted lawmakers’ invitation to speak to Congress.

Durbin, the Illinois senator, said in a statement that he regretted that Netanyahu could not meet with the Democrats.

“We offered the prime minister an opportunity to balance the politically divisive invitation from Speaker (John) Boehner with a private meeting with Democrats who are committed to keeping the bipartisan support of Israel strong,” Durbin said. “His refusal to meet is disappointing to those of us who have stood by Israel for decades.”

(AP)




3 COMMENTS

  1. I find the mechanics of the Obama administration disgraceful. I once thought they were just being partisan babies. But the cruelty is shining forth with more intensity than ever. I no longer feel safe in America with this administration in power. My tefilos are for the downfall of the Obama administration, and its replacement by leaders who are dedicated to honesty, morality, and the advancement of the free world. This is predicated on the absence of support for regimes and ideologies that are a threat to us. The tolerance for Iran, and the implicit support for terror have characterized Obama and his ilk. I despise them, and I can’t wait for them to all be relegated to the bowels of history.

  2. There are three branches of government in the usa congress is one they can invite anyone they choose so Obama can invite sharpton to the White House congress invited Bibi at least we see the Democrats true colors. Go Bibi Go

  3. What intelligent person believes anything Rice says? She’s the one who appeared on 5 news shows after our embassy was attacked in Libya and said the attack was not terrorism, but because of a movie.

    If it weren’t so pathetic, it would be funny.