White House Says Lead NY Times Story Is 100 Percent Wrong

(Monday, September 20th, 2010)

The White House is pushing back hard against a New York Times report that the president’s political team is considering a national ad campaign that would cast the GOP as taken over by tea party extremists.

The story is “100 percent inaccurate,” a White House official told POLITICO.

Times Washington bureau chief Dean Baquet counters that the “piece is accurate.”

Ads By Artscroll:

But White House complaints seem to have had some effect on The Times. The paper walked back the story over night, changing the headline and the lead sentence of the piece to de-emphasize the notion that the White House is weighing an anti-GOP ad campaign.

The initial headline read, “Obama Advisers Weigh Ad Assault Against the GOP,” and the first sentence reported that “President Obama’s political advisers, looking for ways to help Democrats and alter the course of the midterm elections in the final weeks, are considering a national advertising campaign that would cast the Republican Party as all but taken over by Tea Party extremists, people involved in the discussion said.”

The Times subsequently changed the headline to: “Obama Aides Weigh Bid to Tie the GOP to the Tea Party.”

And the opening sentence now says that the White House is considering a “range of ideas, including national advertisements.”

Those changes were not enough to satisfy the White House, according to sources.

“The Times is just flat-out, 100 percent wrong,” a White House official said. “The first time Obama’s advisers heard about a national ad campaign is when the story showed up on The Times’ website last night.”

Have you checked out YWN Radio yet? Click HERE to listen!

(Source: Politico)

Ads By Israel Book Shop:

4 Comments

  1. anonymrs says:

    so much for free speech….just cuz he doesnt like something, that doesnt mean it cant be said.

  2. mark levin says:

    The New York Times =
    The Voice of The Socialist Liberal Democrat Workers Party.

  3. Halelujah says:

    TO ‘anonymrs says:’
    what does that mean “so much for free speech?”
    Do you have a problem with the fact that the White House can ALSO have free speech? Or perhaps you believe that the white house is prohibbitted from speaking out against what they disagree about?!

  4. Moose613 says:

    #2
    I never heard of that party. Are they related to the Paranoid Tea Party anti-semites who have taken over the GOP?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe to RSS Feed For This Article