By: akuperma

akuperma — Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:18:15 +0000

But increased smoking would help solve the problem of the insolvency of social security, many defined benefit pension plans, medicare and legacy retirement costs. The government should encourage smoking (not to mention overeating) and consider putting a tax on health foods and exerise. While there are some ethical problems (heck, for a country that kills babies, what’s a little ethical quandry), it would solve a lot of financial problems, and is less problematic than euthanasia. Be real. On a macroeconomic scale, public health is not only NOT cost efficient, but is counterproductive.

By: eric55

eric55 — Tue, 30 Jul 2013 02:33:07 +0000

If the smoker is not concerned enough about his life to spend $100-$400 to find out if he has cancer why should we be more concerned. When I used to smoke I actually did get a ct scan at my expense thankfully my lungs were gorgeous which caused me to smoke for another two years before I quite

Comments on: Panel Backs Lung Cancer Screening For Some Smokers

By: akuperma

By: eric55