Comments on: Possible Attempted Terror At Eilat Iron Dome

By: boggle

boggle — Fri, 31 Jan 2014 01:25:48 +0000

All terrorists are deranged… thats not news. They always test their waters first. If he would have gotten away with it they would come armed next time.

By: sefi196

sefi196 — Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:54:21 +0000

Hi akuperma,thanx for the comment.
Soi take time out if my day to respond because I don’t like seeing comments on webpages that are lacking validity unanswered.
The UN does not have a stable definition of its owne so I bring you Google’s definition which will do
“the use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.”
Therefore any violent act used to insite fear for the purposes of a political pall agenda is considered terrorism including arcs on army bases/personnel.
Please leave any further comments lacking accuracy at home
Cheers

By: akuperma

akuperma — Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:34:41 +0000

Almost by definition, an attack on a military installation in not terrorism. Terrorism means attacking civilian targets, or at least non-combatant military targets. Attacking soldier is what warfare is all about. If he was unarmed, then it is a political statement or insanity – but still not terrorism.

By calling attacks on military terrorism, you are suggesting the blowing up a pizza place (a crime under international law) is no different that attacking an enemy military installation (which Israel does all the time).