<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Israel Launches Ofek-9 Spy Satellite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/63553/israel-launches-ofek-9-spy-satellite.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/63553/israel-launches-ofek-9-spy-satellite.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 22:49:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.7.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbb</title>
		<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/63553/israel-launches-ofek-9-spy-satellite.html#comment-190477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dbb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/?p=63553#comment-190477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ofek 9 is terribly small to have the capability to be&quot;comparable with the best currently up there.&quot;  Resolution is a good thing, but by itself it does not make a system a world beater.  Collection capacity, agility, scan rate, data storage, data downlink capacity, accuracy of ephemeral data, and much more determine the value of an electro-optical system.  Ofek 9 is just too small a satellite (weight determines capability to a large extent in spacecraft) to be called world class.  Check out the specifications on WorldView 1 and 2 and GeoEye 1 before claiming Ofek 9 is as good as they come.  Not many nations can build a satellite like Ofek 9, but don&#039;t get ahead of yourselves.  You can only pack so much in a 300 kg package.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ofek 9 is terribly small to have the capability to be&#8221;comparable with the best currently up there.&#8221;  Resolution is a good thing, but by itself it does not make a system a world beater.  Collection capacity, agility, scan rate, data storage, data downlink capacity, accuracy of ephemeral data, and much more determine the value of an electro-optical system.  Ofek 9 is just too small a satellite (weight determines capability to a large extent in spacecraft) to be called world class.  Check out the specifications on WorldView 1 and 2 and GeoEye 1 before claiming Ofek 9 is as good as they come.  Not many nations can build a satellite like Ofek 9, but don&#8217;t get ahead of yourselves.  You can only pack so much in a 300 kg package.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shazam</title>
		<link>http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/63553/israel-launches-ofek-9-spy-satellite.html#comment-190378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shazam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/?p=63553#comment-190378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ofek 9 has a sophisticated electro-optical sensor, comparable with the best currently up there.  Its resolution is better than the 70 cm quoted in the public media.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ofek 9 has a sophisticated electro-optical sensor, comparable with the best currently up there.  Its resolution is better than the 70 cm quoted in the public media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
