Comments on: YWN Mailbag: Canadian National Post Columnist Attacks Charedim

By: shimen

shimen — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:06:38 +0000

#14 can you describe yourself when you say your MO as opposed to ‘chareidi’?..the way i understand chareidy meas one who believes in relavation of hashem on har sini and gave us torah shebeksav and torah shebal peh which is codified in 4 parts of shulchen urech which each and every simon and seuf is binding for everyone according to his minhug eg: sfardim according bais yousuf and ashkenazim according to rama..so which one do you belong to that you take yourself out of the chareidim? and if you dont belive in the above, nu whats your problem there are pleny goyim adm jews who were born jews but…(reform , conserative christians, RE: this marshass arrirah in the canadin post this week the articles is mentioned inYWN testerday. she speaks for all those movements) who hate us bcause we adhere to the above ‘lama nikra shemo sini shemishom yarda sia leyisroel’

By: shimen

shimen — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:04:24 +0000

#16 vsorry, yes i know the truth hurts, but thats the fact..the outlook of the conservative, reform are slowly creeping in to MO

By: apushatayid

apushatayid — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:06:50 +0000

This is silly. Of course those who are being labeled “MO” want the Beis Hamikdash rebuilt, where it belongs on the Har Habayis. Perhaps its some of these stupid comments that are being leveled against “MO” Yidden that are a direct cause for some of the hatred this women has towards “charedim”.

What she wrote is vile and ugly. What some are writing here isn’t far from it.

By: shimen

shimen — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:56:55 +0000

#13 no,very shvach

By: SJSinNYC

SJSinNYC — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:22:17 +0000

I am MO and have my own issues with Charedi Judaism, but rebuilding the Bais Hamikdash is not one of them. This article is pretty ridiculous IMO.

By: emes385

emes385 — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:35:54 +0000

And modern orthodox don’t believe in the rebuilding of the bais hamikdash where the temple mount currently stands?

By: jakyweb

jakyweb — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:55:46 +0000

First of all I think this Barbara Kay person is a meshumad reform lunatic. That being said, where is it written that the face of a frum woman is untzniyusdik? Does this mean that we will never see pictures of Sarah Scneirer or other role models of how a Bas Yisroel presents herself to the world?(as a recent issue of Mishpacha magazine decided not to show) ever again in frum magazines?

By: shimen

shimen — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:16:30 +0000

its interesting how people who dont believe in torah misini etc have nerve to define judaism..any religion l’havdol, if you just do your own thing, do what you feel is right and discard what you decide belongs to the dark agas is no religion

By: shimen

shimen — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:07:48 +0000

#5 i think you can join this kay

By: the voice of reason

the voice of reason — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 08:44:08 +0000

Funny she doesn’t mention the Arabs who have a higher birth rate than Charaidm, don’t serve in IDF,are bigger “parisites” and have idea that are much less in line with her beloved enlightened western values.

She writes MO is more athentic then charaidim.
Wondering why embracing the modern world is the litnis test for athenticey?

Domocriey has this horrible issue that if all the liberals stop have kids the county goes more right. To change the election system to take away representation from people because they don’t share your values don’t seem very democratic.