Reply To: How much is a woman's Torah worth

Now we have a situation when a great many feel like learning. So we can draw one of two conclusions: Either they mistakenly think they are in the minority (in which they should stop), or the numbers have changed, in which the halacha should be that they may be taught as well. So I think in dealing with today’s reality the distinction you’re making may not be relevant.

Interesting point, and I’m glad that at least conceptually you agree that #2 (thye should be taught) is a possibility. I don’t think (and this is Stam a Gavra, not a Posek) that girls who learn Nach and Meforshim Leshama would have the wrong intentions just because they are learning Gemorah and Meforshim.

The poskim seem to differentiate the learning for knowledge of Halacha, and learning for learning. It may be part of the each individual mitzvah, as opposed to the mitzva of limud.

Source? As I have understood (besides what my Rov has mentioned from the Pasuk that I brought earlier), the Ikkar Limmud HaTorah is that of practical Halacha, as Chazal have taught (Keddushin 40b):

???? ??? ??? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ??? ???? ???? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ?”? ???? ????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ????? ???? ??????? ???? ???? ????

Golfer/DY: Then the only way I can see it making sense is that teaching any Torah to girls is a Horaa’s Shaa, and that Horaah was only said for Torah Shebiksav. Otherwise why should there be a chiluk?