Yeah, I meant :??
The two ????? ??????’s are “?????? ??? ?????” and “????? ????”.
None of them are that explicit (maybe the pirkei drebi eliezer)
The rosh could be talking with regards to ???? ??????, rashi says woman are bichlal am with regards to the pesukim. And either way, rashi can argue with the rosh.
The gemorrah in yevamos could have said that a single man is like a woman. Instead it says he is not a man. So he is not fullfilling all the requirements for being a man. And since he is still chayav in all the mitzvos he i not a woman.