something that is being overlooked
No, it’s not overlooked, this is how it started.
The literal editing women out of history is what the issue at hand is
If they literally edited them out of history, it’s l’mafreia not a falsehood.
You tried the falsehood argument before. It’s wrong. So you tried the faltche frumkeit argument, which was also wrong. So now you’re going back to the falsehood argument, but it’s still wrong.
They edited out women from a picture because they have a policy not to print pictures of women. They should have either not published it, or at the least, possibly, had a caption reading “edited as per editorial policy not to publish pictures of females”, to avoid the predictable criticism. They didn’t. That’s all.