Some “debates” are just not worth discussing. See what happens when I just replace a few words.
STEP 1-THE FACTS:
1. Those who are pro that the Holocaust happened can easily hide behind the shield of condemning all anti-ers as radical and reform.
2. Holocaust deniers may very well be the result of radicalness, cynicsm, and distrust.
3. All Jews, and most others are likely scared of any truth there may be in the claims of the deniers. Should it turn out the the claims of the deniers are correct, they can never forgive themselves for the problems wrought by their own hands.
4. Many of the believers do not engage in debate with the deniers, usually offering some buzz phrase, like, ‘you’re an anti-Semite,’ usually after denying any contrary evidence whatsoever.
5. If the believers are right, there is no logical reason why they should not, calmly, and factually, defend their position.
STEP 2: THE HYPOTHESIS:
There is more validity to the deniers’ points that the believers would like to admit, yet they are subconciously pre-progammed, brainwashed, even, to uphold the decades-old belief, lest it turns out that they have been responsible for compromising on the integrity of world and German history.
STEP 3: THE RESEARCH: I’m stuck. YWN CR doesn’t allow such topics.
Here are the facts: refusal to vaccinate has led to hundreds, if not thousands, of deaths and major problems in children in this country in the last decade. They are the most rigorously tested things in the world, especially in America. Sometimes responding to others claims does more harm than good. Giving legitimacy to anti-vaccines is horrible, just like giving legitimacy to Holocaust deniers is.