This is ridiculous. Now even the biggest advocate is admitting that the entire foundation of this “theory” is based on a non-existant avi chai study (which I unearthed in an earlier post, and which has nothing to do with population growth at all but rather with the return of irreligious families to day schools due to improved quality of education). That, and the “feelings” of said advocate that there must be a problem and one does not need any ability to analyze data in order to reach a conclusion.
Huh? When one lacks the ability to properly analyze the situation, it follows that any conclusions drawn are fallacious.
So now, won’t the real AZ please shut up