(I’m still awaiting a final decision on that post, mods…)
Slight clarification – by “only on your side, not mine,” [2 posts up]
I meant that you could take it as an insult, but I don’t
think you could reasonably say that I meant to insult you.
(Which does mean that it didn’t qualify for inclusion.)
I object to some of your retelling of the Forest Animal thread>*<:
1) You exaggerated more than slightly about the length of my post.
It was 3 pages, not 7. If we’re going to look at length of responses, and especially proportionate length, I think we should look here:
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/ir-miklat-and-the-wizard-of-oz
“[…]Randomex had yet to respond. When I pointed this out to him, he said that he doesn’t have to respond until I respond to everything he ever said to me in the coffee room which I have not responded to.”
That is simply not what happened. See here (and on):
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/good-jokes/page/34#post-544833
Actually, I brought up the subject,
and eventually said the following:
“Those responses did not exactly inspire me to put in the
effort necessary for a “forest animal” thread response…”
(And now Eftach’s not even here to read these corrections…)
((I really should get back to that thread one of these days…))