Ubiq -“not quite. See here:
I said “”The court interprets the law. That is their role.”
You replied: “Who says? If the law says “Religious accommodation” and they said not more than “de minimus”. Who says that what it means? I say no matter what!”
To which I have been replying several times. It doesnt matter what you say. The court’s role as defined by the constitution is to interpret the law. Of course some of their interpretation wont fit with yours or mine for that matter. In fact in most cases their are even supreme court justices, often as many as 4 who disagree with the court’s interpretation. That doesnt mean every time the court’s interpretation doesnt agree with yours its “just like in Germany”
Why do you make me repeat myself umpteen times?!? Is it because you truly don’t understand or that you can never be wrong?!?
They have the legal right to interpret anyway they want, not necessarily what is a moral interpretation!
Keep dreaming that an employee can take off Shabbos because that’s the law.
They used to post after the SCOTUS decision just saying it means “not more than de minimis cost”. Now they added in “or burden on business operations;”. That to me is changing the basic meaning of the law!!!!
I think they changed it after my Court case!!
This is because at that time I was legally correct!
They change the meaning every time they feel like it!
This is because they are subtlety Antisemitic!!!
But keep voting DemonCrat!!!