Ubiq-“you have been saying that the court changed the law and that they had no right to rule on it. You were wrong on both accounts (I say “were” becasue you now concede that you didint mean they have no right and that the court didnt actually change”
Who said that I was wrong? I said that they were morally wrong! When I said that they changed the law I was talking about my case!
“I’m not sure what you mean. “Undue hardship” Is obviously a vague term. IT is up to the courts to define. That their definition doesn’t fit yours might make the court more conservative than you but it doesn’t make it more anti-semitic.”
You don’t make any sense here! Your assumption that my opinion about the Antisemitism was because I didn’t like their definition of undue hardship is wrong! I wrote they’re Antisemitic because they didn’t follow their own definition in my court case!