Oy more lies 🙁
” Finally at the end you admitted that you don’t know anything about the discrimination law”
Ive admited no such thing. This too is a lie.
All I was adding is that earlier while I did not know when it was amended I found it now.
On the other hand you had said the supreme court amended it (wrong thats not what the court does), after your case (wrong you claim your case was 2006 this was in 1972 which in the real world is before 2006, though perhaps the world of secret supreme court, time works differently).
Of course you also didnt know what gave the court the right to interpret the law. SO I find it amusing when you claim someone else is lacking in knowledge on the subject.
“The whole discussion was about the Court’s definition of “undue hardship”!”
This discussion was about 30 different things. And yes OVer the course of >200 posts Ive educated you somehwat on the subject and you have hopefully learnt a few things along the way (like the role of the court for example) We were Mostly focusing on how you so obviously make things up and think you are fooling anyone.
“Next time, remind me, when I see one your SN’s to stay far away.”
Nooo but we were having so much fun, and youve learnt so much. And besides , sigh I’ll probably forget to remind you becasue of my senility
“That’s right you don’t know anything, except molecule and macromolecule!”
Ah but I also knew mRNA was a nucleic acid which you didnt know. and of course I ve taught you much about how the legal system works including the role of the court and that there is no such thing as secret supreme court cases. And finaly I also know that your Case never took place