Reply To: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ☑️❎🆙

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ☑️❎🆙 Reply To: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ☑️❎🆙

#1212873
Randomex
Member

SIDI:

Randomex, about bullets, sorry but I don't have a code for it.

That’s alright. One of the 8 pages I saved should have a code, or I could just copy them from your post – I’ve been doing that for musical notes from the end of the Laboratory II thread.

Thanks for doing the detailed profile-URL explanation – I’d forgotten about spaces being expressed as “%20”.

(“%X” codes are used for a variety of symbols in URLs.)

Anything else?

Actually, yes. Posts relating to a user’s subtitle may be incomprehensible because their subtitle has changed (possibly even multiple times) since the post.

And the -1 years glitch supposedly causes some posts to be out of order. (I don’t know if that’s permanent, or any other details.)

In this post, DaasYochid claims to have taken advantage of it (to pre-date his own post, I assume) – this claim is questioned by PAA.

Mod:

We can unblock, but it's easier to reactivate from "inactive".

How does that work? Shouldn’t both just be as simple as flipping a switch? (Or is there a registry of blocked users you’ve got to remove someone from in order to unblock them?)

It should be, but due a software glitch, it isn’t.