youdontsay
“Of course the CI allowed the use of manuscripts. The CI did not allow for the uprooting of halacha pesuka with a manuscript.”
Yes obviously. Do you think I meant the chazon Ish would have held if a munuscript says not to do avodah zarah, we should all start? I meant the Chazon Ish didnt support uprooting existing practice based on manuscripts.
“This should never be said over in his name. This statement reflects extremely poor on him.”
you are without question entitled o your opinion. I (and r’ Yoshe ber) disagree
Thefakemaven
You are hocking a cheinek.
you say”Premise A is that one has to do all mitzvos possible, that means every mitzvah.”
then continue.
” But let’s think for a moment, must one get married so he can divorce?”
No. so it isnt every mitzvah. you go on to list some more excellent examples
“these are not a mitzvah”
Um, that may be kefira. Repaying a loan, giving a Get are absolutly mitzvos. As yo ucorrectly pointed out they are a different cateory than mitzva chiyuvis. Yet tehy are mitzvos nonetheless. I am not sure why this isgiving you a hard time.
“I think it self understood that you have nothing to say on this topic ”
which topic? The PAssuk and Mishna? Do you think Shlomo hamelech held one should steal so he can repay get married so he can divorce? (did I relaly not mention this before?)
“you can stop with your excuse of mesorah, the only place in HALACHA that we find the concept of mesorah is with birds,”
No. It is with everything we do. From the very names of the aleph beis to the type of shoe we use for Chalitzah o what we use for r chalipin. eliyahu Hanavi himself wouldnt be able to get us to abandon mesora.
“Why Rav Chaim is not meverer is simply because since he from the Gedoei Hador and has real limited time…..”
too bad he never learnt mishlei חכם לב יקח מצוות, nor the mishna לעולם הוה רץ לדבר משנה. wince
“as for the Esrog, it’s a moot point, there has never and would never be such a thing,.”
you do realize there are midrashim that say tat about techelies as well