ubiquitein:
“No. so it isnt every mitzvah. you go on to list some more excellent examples…Um, that may be kefira. Repaying a loan, giving a Get are absolutly mitzvos”.
As you have vlearly misunderstood (for the umpteenth time), it is ONLY a mitzvah when P (the circumstances) call for it. Only a foolish man would say that one has a mitzvah to repay a loan if he has not borrowed. But isn’t that kefirah? Isn’t it a chiyuv to repay a loan? The answer is simple and glatt, (no brisker torahs need here), it is not a mitzvah if P (in this case the borrowing) is not there, but if P has been done, the AND ONLY THEN is it a mitzvah. Same with gitten and other mitzvohs. So in short, it is not that a person is not mechuyiv if P is not fulfilled, rather ther is no M IF AND ONLY IF P is not fulfilled. [think about this for some time, it is not too difficult].
“I think it self understood that you have nothing to say on this topic ”
about the silly comment of: no race to do mitzvohs.
No. It is with everything we do. From the very names of the aleph beis”
You have obviously not understood why I capitalized HALACHA. Go back and reread my comment, you should be able to understand it, again it is not to difficult.
you do realize there are midrashim that say tat about techelies as well
First off we don not paskn like aggadah, even for a brisker it is imperitive to learn kalalei hapsak.
About the CI
Actually you are contardicting yourself, since in such a case we are not uprooting a halacha, there is no halacha not wear techeilis.