Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨🔬💉🚫 › Reply To: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.👨🔬💉🚫
Proof 95% of SIDS caused by Vaccines – MUST READ!
Dr. Scheibner…invented a computerized breathing monitor for babies which they called “Cotwatch”, short for ‘watching the cot’. In Australia, SIDS is also called Cot Death, because they call their cribs cots.
…Many parents opted for monitoring their newborn babies’ breathing at home, and Scheibner and her husband collected feedback from all parents who used the monitor in this research.
In a scientific study of SIDS, authored by Scheibner, episodes of apnea (cessation of breathing) and hypopnea (abnormally shallow breathing) were measured before and after DPT vaccinations. “Cotwatch” was used, and the computer printouts it generated were analyzed. The data clearly showed that vaccination caused an extraordinary increase in episodes where breathing either nearly ceased or stopped completely. These episodes continued for months following vaccinations.
SIDS occurs among babies who have suffered a physical insult to their vulnerable bodies. Scheibner and Karlsson learned that the most common physical insult suffered by SIDS babies was routine vaccinations. Printouts from their monitor illuminated patterns that indicated critical days after vaccinations.
Scheibner, concluded that “vaccination is the single most prevalent and most preventable cause of infant deaths.” They “soon established that the vaccines are killing babies, and Crib Deaths (SIDS) are 95% vaccine deaths
“Our breathing monitor scientifically established the causal link between vaccines and sudden infant death,” said Dr. Scheibner.
Once they had proven to themselves the causal link between vaccines and SIDS and had appropriately analyzed and documented their findings, Scheibner and Karlsson submitted their work to the medical community for peer review. Rather than attempt to duplicate their work or alter public health policy to protect infants, the majority of the medical community’s members chose to protect the interests of vaccine manufacturers.
Vaccine advocates cannot debate Dr. Scheibner, nor can they defend their motives because the very scientific journals upon which they depend for support, The Journal of the American Medical Association, the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine have all published reports that support her findings.
The bottom line to Dr. Scheibner’s scientifically flawless arguments is that those who are designing and implementing vaccine policy are doing so with the full knowledge that their policies are killing babies