So you’re backing off from your “157 studies” claim entirely, correct? I applaud you for being honest. But I sincerely believe that you should back off of more goalpost movements until you’ve at least done your homework on your initial claims.
To shoot for your current goal, Viera Scheibner lied about disease statistics in various reports, such as polio rates, SIDS rates, and measles in Japan. So why should I believe her alleged CotWatch data that was done in her own lab, under her own watch, with no control group, and no oversight?