SHY: “You could have realized all this yourself RSO, instead of me going digging to find the original wording, but you first try look at everything concerning Lubavitch in a bad light”
The fact is that 1. there is a picture of a kallah in her wedding dress (sans veil) plastered all over the place, and 2. the offensive (and it is offensive) translation is published in a Lubavich “chassidishe” magazine. It could have been edited better, but in all likelihood no lubavicher would blink twice at the wording even if it had been the original.
One more thing, the lashon might be taken from pesukim etc, but it is still something that you would never find in any other chassidus when describing a kallah or any woman. I would be very interested to see if you could prove me wrong here.
Finally, please stop telling me that all I’m out to find things wrong with lubavich. Let’s say that that’s true. Does it make wrong things right?