Reply To: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.πŸ‘¨β€πŸ”¬πŸ’‰πŸš«

Home Forums Controversial Topics Studies on vaccines you might have missed.πŸ‘¨β€πŸ”¬πŸ’‰πŸš« Reply To: Studies on vaccines you might have missed.πŸ‘¨β€πŸ”¬πŸ’‰πŸš«

#1649310
doomsday
Participant

Doomsday: And the Autism Rate went from 1:10,000 to 1:50

DaasYochid: Wait, why was the ratio so low if they were all vaxxed back then? According to you, there’s vaxxed and unvaxxed and nothing in between.

More vaccines do equal more autism. But the MMR -Autism Study was comparing children who received
34 Vaccines (including MMR) with children receiving 32 Vaccines (NO MMR). And there was Healthy User Bias. And some of the No MMR Group may have gotten MMR at school or health clinic and not reported to Insurance company. So that study has no validity.

In the 1960s there was no “healthy user bias” because nobody connected autism to vaccines – because
autism was SO RARE.
Today Autism is 1:50 and Everybody heard of the vaccine-autism connection so if a child is showing signs of autism or delays, those children are more likely to STOP getting vaccinated.

A Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study means children receiving 100% of the CDC Vaccine Schedule vs
100% Unvaccinated Children. (Retrospective, NO ethical issues)
And there are PLENTY of Children in both groups.

So WHY Won’t CDC do the study? Nobody gave a valid answer.
A ProVaxxer claimed that Anti-Vaxxers won’t accept that study because they did not accept other studies.
That’s a weak excuse!
Only a Vaxxed vs UnVaxxed Study has SCIENTIFIC Validity.