interjection “Here’s my own retroactive study. The first routinely recommended vaccine was in 1917. The average life expectancy then was 48.4 years. The vaccine schedule hasn’t changed much since the 1970s until today. Life expectancy in 1970 was 67. Now that we’ve had a few decades of relatively the same vaccine schedule, life expectancy is up to 79 years.
I fear you will argue that it has nothing to do with vaccines because the only reason we are healthier is because of hygiene. Proper hygiene definitely plays a part but if vaccines were dangerous, considering that at least 90% of people follow the recommended schedule and the average life expectancy is increasing, it seems that vaccines are not a huge killer. ”
Seriously???
So let me rephrase it.
You agree to me that a placebo study is needed in order to determine risk.
BUT based on this whole calculation you say that since life expectency went up (based on average life ) then vaccines can’t be too bad . because even if hygenie helped (+ all medication for heart attack and cancer and phenomena,etc. ) the life expectency still went up … and you feel that its right to FORCE me as a parent to take this risk based on this calculation ????
are you really saying this???
can we please keep to logic and not just arguments for the sake of arguments.
I think that driving at 85 mph can’t be too bad , because life expectency went up . so it can’t be too dangerous. so now you can force me to drive at 85 mph or ..