Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Imp”eeeeeeeee”achment › Reply To: Imp”eeeeeeeee”achment
December 13, 2019 12:56 am at 12:56 am
#1810586
philosopher
Participant
Reb Eliezer, sorry! You are right and I’m wrong. They actually did testify that it was quid pro quo. But they have ZERO proof that is was. That’s why I got mixed up. They say what THINK but could NOT prove that the president actually wanted a quid pro quo.
To me if you have no proof and it’s all based on assumption it’s worth zero. And that what I had in my mind when they were asked to provide proof that it was quid pro quo they had none to offer.