KY
“so you were not following the conversation because you didnt even know what it was about”
I made an isolated comment to Joseph, beleive it or not, I didnt think it would explode into this confused back and forth. (sure I expected some back and forth, but my position is quite clear (even if it wasnt at first) and you sTILL dont seem to get it. as evidenced by:
“Reb Eliezer, I’m really shocked that you support ALL abortion being legal.”” WHEN TAKEN IN CONTEXT”
how are you still this confused. That isnt some mystery you uncovered. Yes thats what RE said,
and I stand by that. I support all abortions being legal . (note legal does not equal moral)
My reason for this is : Because the Torah allows abortions (in extenuating circumstances) incuding cases that the lehavdi Catholic church l, and most Republicans wouldn’t
Thus I support all abortions being legal.
Ive been quite clear on this several times.
I even outlined it step by step
you seem to think you “got me” by exposing some hidden context that I missed. Yes RE supports all Abortions being legal. THAT was what I commented on.
“THAT YOU HAVE NO clue what the discussion is about”
How so?
“we argue on what r eliezer meant”
That isnt relevent to my point (as Ive said ) and I’m not arguing on that at all (unless he meant he supports their getting the abortions not their abortions being legal, but I dont think thats what he meant)
“you exaggerated and didn’t mean what you said? im to lazy to scroll back through my comments
care to pinpoint what you mean?”
Yes. In the other thread. you said Democrats support “infanticide” when I called you out on this. you ddint say you exaggerated you doubled down, Then after several back and forths said it wasnt actually true .