You’re doing it again. I don’t disagree with any of what you write but it is NOT an answer to the claim you are tying it to. You cannot make a comment that a doctor subscribes to letting old people go to save the resources for young people based on a situation that does not in any way illustrate that point. You are bringing “supporting evidence” that describes an in the moment need to address two individuals, viable and not viable, and chosing viable with deciding to leave supplies in the storage room just in case a younger person happens to need it. There is no comparison and it might be motzei shem rah to claim he ascribes to the later.
Menu