Ubiq -“Interpretation of what?”
Of this:
“that your interpretation is Not a Legal one!”
“So even if we suspend English, and redefine “having a court case” to include “dismissing a case for being moot””
Why must I explain things that even a kindergarten kid understands?!?
“And you really thought all this time I was saying the court was just going to ignore the case , without formally dismissing it?”
Don’t put words in my mouth!
“(Furthermore Your claim, of what you meant isn’t plausible since AFTER her briefs were submitted, you still insisted she would reveal more evidence in court when her “case is heard”
Again you misunderstood what I wrote.
At that time I didn’t read her file – so I didn’t know that her motion contained her evidence.
This is what happens when you post things on websites for political points!
If you had a drop of honesty – you’d ask her.
She has email and you could have sent her by regular mail.
She might have given you an answer.
But of course, You and the rest of the DemonCrats think – you’re in the right!
Btw, the case is Still pending, but you know that the SCOTUS will give a Judgement of “Moot”.
How do you know that? Are you either a Shoita, Koton or Deaf?
The Gemorah says Nevious is given to one of those 3 types after the Bais Hamikdosh was destroyed.