Reply To: Nadler comments in Congress (Here we go again…)

Smerel -“Had Mr. Stueben argued either (1)that the bill is inherently anti-religion as opposed to a neutral secular law or (2)even in a secular society the bill is objectionable then I would be a lot more sympathetic to what he was saying.”

It’s obvious that you never had a Real Education, like an Ethics course in College.
So get one before you post!