Ubiq -“You say I lied, even though I told the truth. You mentioned (after 25 or so posts arguing about the definition of “hearing”) that you are using a special definition of lie that you call “lie of fabrication” To back up this definition , you brought used psychology wikia as a source (As if that trumps any of the numerous dictionary definitions I provided)
Under this defitnion, from the source YOU provided they have an example of a “lie of fabrication” (again, which is what you are accusing me of)”
Enough with your Manipulation!
I don’t fall for it, & I don’t think other posters will either.
I don’t care how many posts later that I explained that there isn’t one definition of Hearing.
I was using the other one.
So as long that there is a correct definition – I can use it.
You’re so obsessed with finding others wrong, you can’t accept that I wasn’t wrong, but you were!
” (As if that trumps any of the numerous dictionary definitions I provided)
Under this defitnion, ”
Yes, it does. I told you before that the Lie of Fabrication, is defined in more than one place.
Your defense is Ludicrous!
You separate the word “Lie” and “Fabrication”.
This is classic Manipulation!
I’m not defining “Lie” or “Fabrication”!
I’m defining Lie of Fabrication, which you have done in your Statement!
This is a Psychological Definition, not a General one.
And Btw, it’s defined in many Psychological Sites and/or Texts.