Some comments are just asking for a response. Don’t want to call it hypocrisy, but sure seems that way…
“so here’s the thing, I don’t like arguing on the internet or in real life. I was just giving my personal view of the situation, saying that it has come from gleaning facts I can evaluate myself without collecting random opinions. And that it left me wondering why anyone who is running an honest show wants to refuse an audit. Or wants to wipe their cell phones. Or wants to resist fact finding on things they swear are “kosher” but won’t allow anyone to evaluate. It is suspect. If they are so clean then prove it. And I believe that the resistance makes me personally more suspicious than the facts may have done.”
First of all, doubt your ability to determine what facts are. A few minutes perusing your old comments… #1812827 you claim that it is an undisputed fact that Clinton, Obama, and Biden broke laws to interfere with Trump’s campaign (first one). Yet, we all know, the Justice Department under Trump and his henchman Billy Barr, the Republican Congress never found such a finding. So you have an undisputed “fact” that Trump’s own Justice Department and the Republicans never found. Guess you must be privy to some facts that the rest of us are not.
Well, why would I bring up this undisputed fact of yours, because clearly it shows that despite something not being an undisputed fact you concluded it was an undisputed fact. When we talk about audits and exonerating yourself, you suggest that Democrats should support audits conducted by partisan Republicans run by companies that are headed by avid pro-Trumpers and you think that will somehow show the truth. Fascinating the duplicity here. You, yourself, have formed flawed conclusions and have called them undisputed facts despite lacking facts, so when you suggest that a partisan audit would come to an objective result, frankly I assume much like you, they will come to a preconceived conclusion regardless of the facts or lack of them.
Frankly, the opposition to the audits is because the audits are a sham and being conducted unethically and improperly. They can’t form objective opinions because they are 100% the product of extreme bias.
Actually, while I believe flawed in that case, this was your argument in comment #1808280 when you criticized the first impeachment of Trump as being all part of a cabal that had pre-conceived notions. In your own words, “When you lack yashrus, nothing you say is worth listening to.” I guess suddenly now lacking yashrus when you are a conspiracy minded person who supports Trump, somehow makes you worth listening to. My how your deep-seated beliefs and opinions have sure seemed to have changed.
Naturally your inclination will be to respond by calling me a stalker. The thing is some of the other folks here are extremely shallow and clearly off the wall. Debating with them is pointless as everyone can see who and what they are. You though, you try so hard to come across as objective and as someone who sees the bigger picture and has considered an event from many angles, but ultimately I find you twist things to suit your agenda. That is why I choose to sometimes respond to your comments and not others.
Btw, if you do not like arguing, not sure why you would post in this pathetic and ridiculous thread.