Daas, “Um, no, only three for the most vulnerable.”
-Um, no, Israel is already up to the 4th booster and others are following suit so keep yourself updated with the times.
“The healthcare community denies Malone’s claim that he “invented” mRNA vaccines. He contributed to their development. And he’s still in the minority in his skepticism, and even he says some should take it.”
-Oh they deny it? Well what could we have expected. Also minority doesnt mean they are automatically wrong and should be dismissed, thats like saying Jews are minority in the world so who cares about their beliefs they must be wrong. Also he said it may be appropriate for some of course people at risk or elderly then it might be better than taking a chance with the virus. But thats not whats happening. And why censor everyone with a different opinion, you let people hear and decide you cant censor and only feed people the information you want them to hear and believe thats a big red flag and totally wrong.
We already know about the J&J issues that were so severe it had to be stopped even against their agenda. The reason i mention Pfizer and Moderna is due to the wide range popularity and issuance of the vaccine. The others surely have issues as well and you cannot claim to know the long term side effects of any of them unless you have the capability of traveling 10-15 years into the future, as cited on the CDC website (before the page was removed from existence), that vaccines take 10-15 years of trials to be released. Now you might say this isnt a traditional vaccine its an MRNA, well then, wouldnt that make it even more of a risk? An untested NEW type of technology injected into your body?
@alwaysask-“It is well documented that rates are 10x higher for unvaxed.”
-and are those unvaxxed, individuals who had previous infections or just unvaxxed and no previous infection? Its quite an important detail to conveniently keep out you know. Also are they reporting how many VAXXED individuals are hospitalized? Probably not as much. You do understand that if all those with antibodies would have gotten reinfected the hospitals would have been overwhelmed by now, so whats your argument for EVERY single individual to get the vaccines?
“None of these multiple, mostly independently developed, vaccine satisfy you? ”
-Even 1 untested vaccine is risky enough its just common sense, i was focusing on the bigger ones which require 3-4 as of now and are mainstream. How many pills were taken off the market YEARS later due to serious negative effects? So how is a vaccine that was made in less than a year any different? Again am I saying everyone should go out to get COVID certainly not! But if you already had COVID, and the antibodies are proving to both last longer than the vaccines and be naturally effective against all variants, then why push them to take another risk by injecting an unneeded and untested vaccine into their body! That all goes against science.For months they said vaccine is risky for children, suddenly in a week they come up with the fact that its safe for children and mandatory, flip flopping and contradicting themselves day to day but some amongst us are so ignorant that they will believe anything no matter what they see or hear for themselves. If you want to get the vaccine then go ahead but thats where it should end.
Oh and DaasYochid we are only at 3? Keyword ONLY right? What other vaccine then requires 2-3 (4 by now but whatever) doses in less than a year? Most vaccines are once in a lifetime and even the flu shot is annual. What Dr Malone said was plain common sense that since we do not know the long term effects it is risky and with every dose carries a greater risk. Its plain logic. And yes he is the inventor of the MRNA Vaccine.