The DA’s office didn’t put on a good case. They didn’t submit any evidence regarding the curfew. They had no response to the gun charge, once the defence claimed the law only prevented 17 year old from owning a short barrel gun, which the AR15 wasn’t. As far as the rest of the charges the defence was claiming selfdefence all the evidence showed he only shot after he was attacked and with the videos showing what happened it was hard for them to show it wasn’t selfdefence. They tried to say that the pointing of his gun was provocation but I don’t think the jury was buying it.
Menu