jackk-
1) It’s up to the House to decide if what he was accused of is an impeachable offense and whether you like it or not they decided that it is and impeached him. It’s up to the Senate to decide if there is enough evidence to prove that he’s guilty- not to decide if he should have been impeached in the first place. Like I mentioned earlier on about the Supreme Court nominee- she seems to have had many of her rulings overruled by higher courts- she either isn’t familiar with the Constitution or she rules the way she wants the law to be.
2) I’m not sure what you’re getting at over here. Can you just explain how you can stand up for a political party that wants to redefine the word “marriage” to include relationships that the Torah call an abomination?
3) There’s plenty of videos all over the Internet showing people walking in to drug stores and walking out with hundreds of Dollars worth of merchandise right in front eyes of the security guards. There are plenty of stories in the news of people getting arrested (even multiple times in a single day) yet they get let out without even having to post bail. Are you unfamiliar with these videos and stories or do you consider it a consequence that they were inconvenienced by being captured before being immediately released?
4) You seem to be going on a tangent over here to promote the Democrats but stop short of saying what the policies were that created all these jobs. Let’s get back to the main topic.
If so many jobs were created- has the cost of Government handouts gone down?
5) You seem to have gone on another tangent over here to bring in health care. This is a complicated topic which is beyond the scope of this thread. As an actuary who briefly worked in the ACA, I have a much deeper understanding of the internal details than what’s been discussed here. I’ve seen the numbers first hand and can tell you that it had no chance of sustaining itself the way it was designed. (One of the most common comments I recall from my colleagues is “How did anyone think this would work?”)
But back to the main point- you had originally asked who would take care of people who no matter what will never be able to stand up on their own (e.g. people with disabilities). I answered that you know good and well that no matter how right wing a government is they will never abandon them.
6) I’m not sure what you’re getting at over here either- and you seemed to have gone on another tangent by brining up assault weapons. Instead of answering my question about how you can stand up for a party that wants to permit the killing of unborn babies you turn it around to say that Republicans are hypocritical for calling it murder. Can you answer the question without turning it around?
The topic of guns is very complicated. If there was some way to get dangerous weapons out of the hands of criminals and convicted felons then maybe you’d have a complaint against them. As of now- the criminals seem to be getting them illegally from somewhere and innocent civilians need to protect themselves somehow. Imagine how much worse the crime would be if the criminals would know that the innocent people they are attacking are not armed.