Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Groff v Dejoy › Reply To: Groff v Dejoy
April 20, 2023 9:25 am at 9:25 am
#2182523
ubiquitin
Participant
Akuperma
It would depend on what how court decides if more narrowly limited to 1st amendment then I agree witjh you
but if they add that it violates the civil rights act of 64, somewhat overuling TWA v Hardison that seems significant