Anon – i never said Ezra was a navi. He had a mesorah of a nevuah that is open in yirmayahu, 29:10:
כִּֽי־כֹה֙ אָמַ֣ר ה” כִּ֠י לְפִ֞י מְלֹ֧את לְבָבֶ֛ל שִׁבְעִ֥ים שָׁנָ֖ה אֶפְקֹ֣ד אֶתְכֶ֑ם וַהֲקִמֹתִ֤י עֲלֵיכֶם֙ אֶת־דְּבָרִ֣י הַטּ֔וֹב לְהָשִׁ֣יב אֶתְכֶ֔ם אֶל־הַמָּק֖וֹם הַזֶּֽה׃
The nevuah was that galus bavel was 70 years. Those 70 years were up, and now it was time to go back.
And from where do you know your statements about “eretz yisroel”? The same chazal you think we’re wrong about everything else you wrote! It’s a complete contradiction.
Like i said, it’s either baal or Hashem; there’s no other way.
For the record, no one’s talking bad about the land. That’s old fashioned zionist mumbo jumbo – we’re talking about keeping the laws of that land in the Torah, namely what Hashem told us to do with it and what not to do with it when in galus. The land is great, eretz hakedoshah, but we’re in galus and that’s not going to change by supporting a shmad state there.