@@fakenews
I hope you׳re just trolling, because not one thing you said has any basis in the talmud or halacha. Number one, his question has to do with whether an ע״א is considered a שוגג, and he picked a perfectly valid example of עדות אשה, where an ע״א is נאמן, so your אין דשב״ע פחות מב׳ response is unintelligible.
Number two, allowing an עד אחד to be מתיר her להינשא is not a ״rare circumstance”, and you just added on a ridiculous, false condition of ״bari li” which any בר בי רב לחד יומא understands is made up, and can only have been created by someone who hasn’t the foggiest, working knowledge of יבמות, כתובות, גיטין, קידושין, שבועות, etc., etc.
Number three, Your prophetic vision about a “minor issur not ״חייב כרת could only have been dreamt up by someone who didn’t even see רש״י or תוספות on the first folio of gittin. Even a היינטיגע ראש ישיבה couldn’t be so ignorant.
Number four, your ״financial incentive” hogwash comes from a violent perversion of a גמרא in עבודה זרה and a רמב”ם and your ignorance is bliss.
Your response is not the ״light version” or the answer but rather the imbecile version of the answer.
As far as your allegation that the original poster is not crom BMG, I can only glean from your blathering response that you are from BMG, because only someone who has been through a whole machzor of ignorance could have composed this.
ואתה שלום.